Βασιλεύς comme équivalent de špṭ puniques: problème du statut d’Hannibal après 201 av. J.-C.

IF 0.1 3区 历史学 0 CLASSICS
Acta Classica Pub Date : 2022-01-26 DOI:10.1353/acl.0.0013
Miron Wolny
{"title":"Βασιλεύς comme équivalent de špṭ puniques: problème du statut d’Hannibal après 201 av. J.-C.","authors":"Miron Wolny","doi":"10.1353/acl.0.0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article deals with the issue of the political and legal status of Hannibal after 201 BC. It begins by examining whether the status of Hannibal changed during the Second Punic War, and concludes that the scope of Hannibal’s competence (as στρατηγός) remained unchanged at this time. It then argues that the next office occupied by Hannibal after the end of the war was a formal consequence of his career development. The main reason for the doubts that arose in the sources about the status of Hannibal was the result of them looking at this Carthaginian leader through the prism of Roman jurisprudence.","PeriodicalId":41891,"journal":{"name":"Acta Classica","volume":" ","pages":"-"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Classica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/acl.0.0013","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article deals with the issue of the political and legal status of Hannibal after 201 BC. It begins by examining whether the status of Hannibal changed during the Second Punic War, and concludes that the scope of Hannibal’s competence (as στρατηγός) remained unchanged at this time. It then argues that the next office occupied by Hannibal after the end of the war was a formal consequence of his career development. The main reason for the doubts that arose in the sources about the status of Hannibal was the result of them looking at this Carthaginian leader through the prism of Roman jurisprudence.
Βασιλεύς相当于布匿语:公元前201年后汉尼拔地位问题。J、-C。
本文论述了公元前201年以后汉尼拔的政治和法律地位问题。它首先考察了汉尼拔在第二次布匿战争期间的地位是否发生了变化,并得出结论,汉尼拔的能力范围(如στρατηγς)在此时保持不变。然后,它认为汉尼拔在战争结束后占据的下一个办公室是他职业发展的正式结果。消息来源对汉尼拔的地位产生怀疑的主要原因是他们通过罗马法学的棱镜来看待这位迦太基领袖。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Classica
Acta Classica CLASSICS-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信