Evidentiality and stance in YouTube comments on smartphone reviews

IF 1.1 Q3 COMMUNICATION
Alejandro Parini, A. Fetzer
{"title":"Evidentiality and stance in YouTube comments on smartphone reviews","authors":"Alejandro Parini, A. Fetzer","doi":"10.1075/IP.00025.PAR","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Online participatory environments have become saturated spaces in terms of the opportunities that they offer for the\n display of different viewpoints and ideologies. YouTube, as a popular video-sharing and networking site,\n constitutes a new media space that invites both individual and collaborative stance-taking by participants who gather, virtually,\n to address a particular topic, issue or event depicted visually and discussed textually through the comments that are posted on\n the site. This interactional dynamics triggers a dialogic sequence of follow-ups through which stances are formulated following up\n on previous stances or counterstances. Against this background, this paper reports on a case study of individual and\n collaborative, and interdiscursive and intradiscursive stance-taking in participants’ comments to an online review focusing on the\n strategic use of direct (tactile) and indirect (inferential) references to evidentiality and their co-occurrence with\n argumentative markers. In this multilayered context stance-taking does not only contribute to evaluation but also to the\n construction of collective identities.","PeriodicalId":36241,"journal":{"name":"Internet Pragmatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internet Pragmatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/IP.00025.PAR","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Online participatory environments have become saturated spaces in terms of the opportunities that they offer for the display of different viewpoints and ideologies. YouTube, as a popular video-sharing and networking site, constitutes a new media space that invites both individual and collaborative stance-taking by participants who gather, virtually, to address a particular topic, issue or event depicted visually and discussed textually through the comments that are posted on the site. This interactional dynamics triggers a dialogic sequence of follow-ups through which stances are formulated following up on previous stances or counterstances. Against this background, this paper reports on a case study of individual and collaborative, and interdiscursive and intradiscursive stance-taking in participants’ comments to an online review focusing on the strategic use of direct (tactile) and indirect (inferential) references to evidentiality and their co-occurrence with argumentative markers. In this multilayered context stance-taking does not only contribute to evaluation but also to the construction of collective identities.
YouTube评论智能手机评论的证据和立场
在线参与环境已经成为展示不同观点和意识形态的饱和空间。YouTube作为一个受欢迎的视频共享和网络网站,构成了一个新的媒体空间,邀请参与者采取个人和合作的立场,他们聚集在一起,通过网站上发布的评论,以视觉方式描述和文本方式讨论特定的主题、问题或事件。这种相互作用的动态触发了后续行动的对话序列,通过该序列,在先前的立场或反立场的基础上制定立场。在这种背景下,本文报告了一个案例研究,即参与者对一篇在线评论的评论中的个人、合作、跨话语和话语内立场,重点是对证据性的直接(触觉)和间接(推理)引用的策略使用,以及它们与议论文标记的共现。在这种多层面的背景下,采取立场不仅有助于评估,也有助于构建集体身份。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Internet Pragmatics
Internet Pragmatics Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信