Digital twins and the terminology of “personalization” or “personalized learning” in educational policy: A discussion paper

IF 1.3 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
J. Arantes
{"title":"Digital twins and the terminology of “personalization” or “personalized learning” in educational policy: A discussion paper","authors":"J. Arantes","doi":"10.1177/14782103231176357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There has been a policy push in K-12 educational settings towards personalized learning in the last decade. Commercial platforms and learning designers have responded, offering learning tools to support teaching and learning through data-driven insights and recommendations. Trending towards the augmentation or replacing human teachers with non-human technology, this paper argues that personalized learning with human teachers is an entirely different process from personalization with digital twins. Drawing on new materialist thinking, it explores the impacts and implications for discourse concerning teacher quality and disadvantages within educational systems. It clarifies the conflation of the terms “personalized learning” and “personalization” to illuminate the power, positionality, and privilege enabled for some, in conflating terms in Australian educational policy.","PeriodicalId":46984,"journal":{"name":"Policy Futures in Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Policy Futures in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14782103231176357","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There has been a policy push in K-12 educational settings towards personalized learning in the last decade. Commercial platforms and learning designers have responded, offering learning tools to support teaching and learning through data-driven insights and recommendations. Trending towards the augmentation or replacing human teachers with non-human technology, this paper argues that personalized learning with human teachers is an entirely different process from personalization with digital twins. Drawing on new materialist thinking, it explores the impacts and implications for discourse concerning teacher quality and disadvantages within educational systems. It clarifies the conflation of the terms “personalized learning” and “personalization” to illuminate the power, positionality, and privilege enabled for some, in conflating terms in Australian educational policy.
数字双胞胎与教育政策中的“个性化”或“个性化学习”术语:一篇讨论论文
在过去的十年里,K-12教育环境中的政策一直在推动个性化学习。商业平台和学习设计师做出了回应,通过数据驱动的见解和建议,提供了支持教学的学习工具。本文倾向于用非人类技术增加或取代人类教师,认为人类教师的个性化学习与数字双胞胎的个性化学习是一个完全不同的过程。它借鉴新唯物主义思想,探讨了教育系统中教师素质和劣势话语的影响和启示。它澄清了“个性化学习”和“个性化”这两个术语的合并,以阐明澳大利亚教育政策中为一些人提供的权力、地位和特权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Policy Futures in Education
Policy Futures in Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
13.30%
发文量
76
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信