Failure of Sequential Compression Device Detected by Neuromonitoring during Minimally Invasive Posterior Scoliosis Surgery

IF 0.2 Q4 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Kristen D. Raue, J. Shils, R. Fessler
{"title":"Failure of Sequential Compression Device Detected by Neuromonitoring during Minimally Invasive Posterior Scoliosis Surgery","authors":"Kristen D. Raue, J. Shils, R. Fessler","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1764297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Intraoperative neuromonitoring is recommended as standard practice for corrective scoliosis surgery. Common methods include somatosensory-evoked potentials (SSEPs) and transcranial motor-evoked potentials (TcMEPs), which have been shown to have a high diagnostic accuracy in detecting new neurological deficits postoperatively. Sequential compression devices (SCDs) are a common method for thromboprophylaxis in spine surgery and are not known to have many device-related complications. To date, there have been no reports of lower extremity ischemia secondary to SCD deflation failure detected by multimodality neuromonitoring during minimally invasive posterior spine surgery. We, therefore, present a case report of an 18-year-old male with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis who underwent minimally invasive posterior spinal fusion with instrumentation. Intraoperative decrease in SSEPs and TcMEPs were noted in the left leg shortly after incision before any instrumentation or reduction occurred. Further examination revealed that the left leg was hypoperfused compared with the right leg and that the left SCD was not properly deflating. Bilateral SCDs were removed, and perfusion and neuromonitoring returned to baseline immediately. Bilateral SCDs and the machine were replaced, and neuromonitoring remained within normal limits for the rest of the surgery. The patient had no postoperative neurologic or vascular deficits. Early detection of lower extremity ischemia by neuromonitoring resulted in the prompt identification and addressing of SCD malfunction, sparing devastating neurological and vascular injury to the patient's leg. This case reinforces the importance of neuromonitoring within spine surgery.","PeriodicalId":16574,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuroanaesthesiology and Critical Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuroanaesthesiology and Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1764297","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Intraoperative neuromonitoring is recommended as standard practice for corrective scoliosis surgery. Common methods include somatosensory-evoked potentials (SSEPs) and transcranial motor-evoked potentials (TcMEPs), which have been shown to have a high diagnostic accuracy in detecting new neurological deficits postoperatively. Sequential compression devices (SCDs) are a common method for thromboprophylaxis in spine surgery and are not known to have many device-related complications. To date, there have been no reports of lower extremity ischemia secondary to SCD deflation failure detected by multimodality neuromonitoring during minimally invasive posterior spine surgery. We, therefore, present a case report of an 18-year-old male with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis who underwent minimally invasive posterior spinal fusion with instrumentation. Intraoperative decrease in SSEPs and TcMEPs were noted in the left leg shortly after incision before any instrumentation or reduction occurred. Further examination revealed that the left leg was hypoperfused compared with the right leg and that the left SCD was not properly deflating. Bilateral SCDs were removed, and perfusion and neuromonitoring returned to baseline immediately. Bilateral SCDs and the machine were replaced, and neuromonitoring remained within normal limits for the rest of the surgery. The patient had no postoperative neurologic or vascular deficits. Early detection of lower extremity ischemia by neuromonitoring resulted in the prompt identification and addressing of SCD malfunction, sparing devastating neurological and vascular injury to the patient's leg. This case reinforces the importance of neuromonitoring within spine surgery.
微创后脊柱侧凸手术中神经监测检测顺序压迫装置失效
摘要术中神经监测被推荐为脊柱侧弯矫正手术的标准实践。常见的方法包括体感诱发电位(SSEPs)和经颅运动诱发电位(TcMEPs),它们已被证明在术后检测新的神经缺陷方面具有很高的诊断准确性。顺序压迫装置(SCDs)是脊椎手术中预防血栓形成的常用方法,目前尚不清楚是否存在许多与装置相关的并发症。到目前为止,还没有关于在微创后脊柱手术中通过多模式神经监测检测到SCD放气失败导致的下肢缺血的报告。因此,我们提出一例18岁男性青少年特发性脊柱侧弯患者的病例报告,该患者接受了微创脊柱融合术。切口后不久,在任何器械或复位发生之前,左腿的SSEP和TcMEP在术中减少。进一步检查显示,与右腿相比,左腿灌注不足,左侧SCD没有适当放气。双侧SCD被移除,灌注和神经监测立即恢复到基线。更换了双侧SCD和机器,在剩下的手术中,神经监测保持在正常范围内。患者术后无神经或血管缺损。通过神经监测早期发现下肢缺血,可以及时识别和解决SCD功能障碍,避免对患者腿部造成毁灭性的神经和血管损伤。这个案例强化了脊柱手术中神经监测的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Neuroanaesthesiology and Critical Care
Journal of Neuroanaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine-Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信