The Extended Fama-French Three Factor Model : Revisited

IF 0.1 Q4 ECONOMICS
I. Awwaliyah, Z. Husodo
{"title":"The Extended Fama-French Three Factor Model : Revisited","authors":"I. Awwaliyah, Z. Husodo","doi":"10.21002/ICMR.V10I2.11181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper is aimed to validate the four-factor asset pricing model as an improvement towards the standard Fama-French three-factor model. Using U.S. monthly stock returns data from period January 1963 to December 2010 , we construct 25 portfolios and t he four-factor model includes the market factor (beta), the size factor (SMB), the book-to-market factor (HML), and the ‘momentum' factor (MOM). Similar time series method as in Fama and French (1993) are employed to elaborate the three-factor model and the four-factor model regression. Our findings show that the four-factor model to some extent has significant capability in explaining the variations in average excess stock returns. Although the R 2 extracted from the four-factor model is just slightly higher than the three-factor model, yet it provides suggestive for the robustness of the four-factor model. In addition , our robustness test shows that January seasonal effect is absorbed by the risk factors including the market factors, SMB, HML, and MOM factor. The consistency of the four-factor model in explaining the U.S stock market return variations for the newest data, provide relevance to apply this model in emerging markets data in order to give guidance for investor in understanding the market condition.","PeriodicalId":40640,"journal":{"name":"Indonesian Capital Market Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesian Capital Market Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21002/ICMR.V10I2.11181","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper is aimed to validate the four-factor asset pricing model as an improvement towards the standard Fama-French three-factor model. Using U.S. monthly stock returns data from period January 1963 to December 2010 , we construct 25 portfolios and t he four-factor model includes the market factor (beta), the size factor (SMB), the book-to-market factor (HML), and the ‘momentum' factor (MOM). Similar time series method as in Fama and French (1993) are employed to elaborate the three-factor model and the four-factor model regression. Our findings show that the four-factor model to some extent has significant capability in explaining the variations in average excess stock returns. Although the R 2 extracted from the four-factor model is just slightly higher than the three-factor model, yet it provides suggestive for the robustness of the four-factor model. In addition , our robustness test shows that January seasonal effect is absorbed by the risk factors including the market factors, SMB, HML, and MOM factor. The consistency of the four-factor model in explaining the U.S stock market return variations for the newest data, provide relevance to apply this model in emerging markets data in order to give guidance for investor in understanding the market condition.
扩展的Fama-Franch三因素模型:再认识
本文旨在验证四因素资产定价模型是对标准Fama-Franch三因素模型的改进。使用1963年1月至2010年12月期间的美国月度股票回报数据,我们构建了25个投资组合,四因素模型包括市场因素(贝塔)、规模因素(SMB)、账面市值因素(HML)和“动量”因素(MOM)。采用与Fama和French(1993)相似的时间序列方法来阐述三因素模型和四因素模型回归。我们的研究结果表明,四因素模型在一定程度上具有解释股票平均超额收益变化的显著能力。尽管从四因素模型中提取的R2仅略高于三因素模型,但它为四因素模型的稳健性提供了建议。此外,我们的稳健性检验表明,1月份的季节性影响被包括市场因素、SMB、HML和MOM因素在内的风险因素所吸收。四因素模型在解释美国股市最新数据回报变化方面的一致性,为将该模型应用于新兴市场数据提供了相关性,以指导投资者了解市场状况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书