ICNP® terminology subset for people with chronic kidney disease under conservative treatment

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING
Harlon França de Menezes, A. Camacho, Rosana Moreira de Sant’Anna, Tatyana Lós de Melo Matos, Isabele Silva dos Santos, Ana Cristina da Paixão Silva, Cleide Gonçalo Rufino, Richardson Augusto Rossendo da Silva
{"title":"ICNP® terminology subset for people with chronic kidney disease under conservative treatment","authors":"Harlon França de Menezes, A. Camacho, Rosana Moreira de Sant’Anna, Tatyana Lós de Melo Matos, Isabele Silva dos Santos, Ana Cristina da Paixão Silva, Cleide Gonçalo Rufino, Richardson Augusto Rossendo da Silva","doi":"10.37689/acta-ape/2023ao0140333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To carry out content validity of the statements of International Classification for Nursing Practice (ICNP®) terminology subset diagnoses, outcomes and nursing interventions for people with chronic kidney disease on conservative treatment.\n\nMethods: A methodological study, which followed the Brazilian method guidelines, with content validity conducted by the Delphi technique and carried out with 67 expert nurses. A total of 123 nursing diagnosis/outcome statements and 215 nursing intervention statements, distributed by Callista Roy’s adaptation model of nursing modes were assessed. To assess the degree of agreement regarding the meaning and clinical use among experts, the Content Validity Index (CVI) was used, accepting statements that presented an index ≥ 0.80.\nResults\n\nAfter two Delphi rounds, 117 diagnoses/outcomes and 199 nursing interventions were validated. Of the diagnoses, 70 (60%) were classified in Physiological Mode, 19 (16%) in Self-Concept Mode, 17 (14%) in Real-Life Function Mode, and 11 (10%) in Callista Roy’s Interdependence Mode. Among the most prevalent diagnostic statements were: “Altered Blood Pressure”, “Peripheral Oedema”, “Fluid Retention”, “Lack of Knowledge of Dietary Regime”, “Impaired Adaptation”, “Self-Care Deficit” and “Impaired Access to Treatment”. Valid nursing interventions underwent wording changes.\n\nConclusion: The development of an ICNP® terminology subset according to the adopted theoretical model proved to be valid in terms of content for the care of people with chronic kidney disease undergoing conservative treatment through clear and directive care plans.","PeriodicalId":6891,"journal":{"name":"Acta Paulista De Enfermagem","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Paulista De Enfermagem","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37689/acta-ape/2023ao0140333","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To carry out content validity of the statements of International Classification for Nursing Practice (ICNP®) terminology subset diagnoses, outcomes and nursing interventions for people with chronic kidney disease on conservative treatment. Methods: A methodological study, which followed the Brazilian method guidelines, with content validity conducted by the Delphi technique and carried out with 67 expert nurses. A total of 123 nursing diagnosis/outcome statements and 215 nursing intervention statements, distributed by Callista Roy’s adaptation model of nursing modes were assessed. To assess the degree of agreement regarding the meaning and clinical use among experts, the Content Validity Index (CVI) was used, accepting statements that presented an index ≥ 0.80. Results After two Delphi rounds, 117 diagnoses/outcomes and 199 nursing interventions were validated. Of the diagnoses, 70 (60%) were classified in Physiological Mode, 19 (16%) in Self-Concept Mode, 17 (14%) in Real-Life Function Mode, and 11 (10%) in Callista Roy’s Interdependence Mode. Among the most prevalent diagnostic statements were: “Altered Blood Pressure”, “Peripheral Oedema”, “Fluid Retention”, “Lack of Knowledge of Dietary Regime”, “Impaired Adaptation”, “Self-Care Deficit” and “Impaired Access to Treatment”. Valid nursing interventions underwent wording changes. Conclusion: The development of an ICNP® terminology subset according to the adopted theoretical model proved to be valid in terms of content for the care of people with chronic kidney disease undergoing conservative treatment through clear and directive care plans.
接受保守治疗的慢性肾脏病患者的ICNP®术语子集
目的:验证国际护理实践分类(ICNP®)术语子集对保守治疗慢性肾脏病患者的诊断、结果和护理干预的内容有效性。方法:遵循巴西方法指南,采用德尔菲技术进行内容有效性的方法学研究,共有67名专家护士参与。通过Callista Roy的护理模式适应模型,共评估了123份护理诊断/结果陈述和215份护理干预陈述。为了评估专家们对意义和临床使用的一致程度,使用了内容有效性指数(CVI),接受了指数≥0.80的陈述。结果经过两轮德尔菲调查,117项诊断/结果和199项护理干预措施得到了验证。在诊断中,70(60%)分为生理模式,19(16%)分为自我概念模式,17(14%)分为现实生活功能模式,11(10%)分为卡利斯塔-罗伊相互依赖模式。最常见的诊断陈述包括:“血压改变”、“外周水肿”、“液体滞留”、“缺乏饮食制度知识”、“适应障碍”、“自我护理缺陷”和“治疗障碍”。有效的护理干预措施的措辞发生了变化。结论:根据所采用的理论模型开发的ICNP®术语子集在内容方面被证明是有效的,可以通过明确和指导的护理计划来护理接受保守治疗的慢性肾脏病患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
92
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Paulista de Enfermagem – (Acta Paul Enferm.), ISSN 1982-0194, is a [bilingual] technical-scientific electronic publication of the Escola Paulista de Enfermagem – EPE, Universidade Federal de São Paulo – UNIFESP. Our mission: To disseminate the scientific knowledge generated within the rigor of research and ethics methodology. Our objective: To publish results of original research for advancement of practices of clinical, surgical, and management nursing, as well as education, research, and information and communication technology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信