Understanding effective entrepreneurial education vis-à-vis Thai entrepreneurs’ altruism and procedural fairness on being happy: More money or more happiness?

Q3 Social Sciences
Chutinon Putthiwanit, Phurichchaya Taeporamaysamai
{"title":"Understanding effective entrepreneurial education vis-à-vis Thai entrepreneurs’ altruism and procedural fairness on being happy: More money or more happiness?","authors":"Chutinon Putthiwanit, Phurichchaya Taeporamaysamai","doi":"10.18844/cjes.v18i1.8582","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The concept of give and take is nothing peculiar for higher educational institution students. In order to survive, living along as an isolated island is not a lucrative way to survive: Human beings need to be socialized. Thus, by exchanging/bartering what they acquired to the others group, without expected return, is a sign or altruism. But why did they decide to give so, was it because they had the feelings of happiness or just a feeling of giving away? Consequently, by understand the effect of such reciprocity, authors would like to see whether it is rational enough to be procedurally fair and altruistic at the same time, as well as the application of this concept for higher educational institutions. Can this be a sign for entrepreneurial education? Authors take data of Thai entrepreneurs from World Value Survey Database. World Values Survey was conducted by World Values Survey Association with the current seventh wave covered 80 countries; the length of survey spanned from 2017-2021. This research is divided accordingly: The first part introduces rational aspects; secondly, literature reviews are explored in various perspectives and their side-effect; thirdly, methodology is explained and analyzed by using secondary data with multiple regression; and finally, the results and further research are discussed.","PeriodicalId":37121,"journal":{"name":"Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v18i1.8582","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The concept of give and take is nothing peculiar for higher educational institution students. In order to survive, living along as an isolated island is not a lucrative way to survive: Human beings need to be socialized. Thus, by exchanging/bartering what they acquired to the others group, without expected return, is a sign or altruism. But why did they decide to give so, was it because they had the feelings of happiness or just a feeling of giving away? Consequently, by understand the effect of such reciprocity, authors would like to see whether it is rational enough to be procedurally fair and altruistic at the same time, as well as the application of this concept for higher educational institutions. Can this be a sign for entrepreneurial education? Authors take data of Thai entrepreneurs from World Value Survey Database. World Values Survey was conducted by World Values Survey Association with the current seventh wave covered 80 countries; the length of survey spanned from 2017-2021. This research is divided accordingly: The first part introduces rational aspects; secondly, literature reviews are explored in various perspectives and their side-effect; thirdly, methodology is explained and analyzed by using secondary data with multiple regression; and finally, the results and further research are discussed.
了解有效的创业教育与泰国企业家的利他主义和幸福的程序公平:更多的钱还是更多的幸福?
给予和索取的概念对高等教育机构的学生来说并不奇怪。为了生存,作为一个孤岛生活并不是一种有利可图的生存方式:人类需要社会化。因此,通过将他们获得的东西交换/交换给其他群体,而没有预期的回报,是一种迹象或利他主义。但他们为什么决定这样付出,是因为他们有幸福的感觉,还是只是一种付出的感觉?因此,通过理解这种互惠的影响,作者希望了解在程序上公平和利他主义是否足够理性,以及这一概念在高等教育机构中的应用。这能成为创业教育的标志吗?作者从世界价值调查数据库中获取了泰国企业家的数据。世界价值调查由世界价值调查协会进行,目前第七波调查覆盖了80个国家;调查时间跨度为2017-2021年。本研究分为以下几个部分:第一部分介绍理性方面;其次,从不同角度探讨了文献综述及其副作用;再次,利用二次数据进行多元回归,对方法论进行解释和分析;最后,对研究结果和进一步的研究进行了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences
Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences Social Sciences-Education
自引率
0.00%
发文量
283
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信