Incidence and management of deep surgical site infection following spinal deformity surgery: 8 818 cases at a single institution

Q4 Medicine
Muyi Wang, Bin Wang, Y. Qiu, Ze-zhang Zhu, C. Du, Liang Xu, Qinshuang Zhou, Bo Yang
{"title":"Incidence and management of deep surgical site infection following spinal deformity surgery: 8 818 cases at a single institution","authors":"Muyi Wang, Bin Wang, Y. Qiu, Ze-zhang Zhu, C. Du, Liang Xu, Qinshuang Zhou, Bo Yang","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0253-2352.2020.04.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo investigate the incidence and management of deep surgical site infection(SSI) after the spinal deformity surgery. \n \n \nMethods \nThis study retrospectively reviewed a consecutive cohort of 8818 patients with spinal deformity who received spinal deformity surgery between January1998 and December 2017 at our center. The diagnosis of deep SSI was based on the clinical symptoms, imaging data and laboratory findings. Early infection and late infection were defined as deep infections occurring 3 months after the initial procedure, respectively. All deep SSIs were first treated with irrigation and debridement, closed suction irrigation system and antibiotics. If the infection cannot be eradicated, dressing change is recommended within 2 years after the initial surgery. The instrumentation can be removed 2 years after the initial surgery with careful evaluation of the fusion mass. The posterior-anterior and lateral radiographs were used to measure the coronal parameters and sagittal alignment. \n \n \nResults \nSixty patients were diagnosed as deep SSI after spinal deformity surgery, including 11 patients with early infection and 49 patients with late infection. No significant difference was observed in terms of age, gender ratio, surgical approach and fusion levels between the two groups. Deep SSI seemed to be more likely to occur between 2 and 5 years after surgery. Incidence of SSI was lowest in the patients with idiopathic scoliosis and ankylosing spondylitis, and highest in the patients with neuromuscular and syndromic scoliosis. There was a high rate of negative culture in the primary culture. Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli were the most common organisms in the early infection, while patients with late infection had a high rate of low-virulent skin flora. In the early infection group, nine patients retained instrumentation while the implants were removed 2 years after the primary surgery in 2 patients. In patients with late infection, instrumentation was retained in 5 cases and removed in 10 cases until 2 years after the primary surgery. 34 cases were infected 2 years after the primary surgery and the implants were removed directly. One patient underwent reoperation with instrumentation 1 month after implant removal, another patient underwent reoperation 3 years after implant removal due to progression of deformity. Significant loss of coronal correction was noted at the latest follow-up. \n \n \nConclusion \nThe rate of deep SSI after spinal deformity surgery was 0.68%, of which the incidence of early infection and delayed infection was 0.12% and 0.56%, respectively. An increased risk of SSI in patients with neuromuscular and syndromic scoliosis was noted. If the infection cannot be eradicated after repeated debridement, we recommend instrumentation removal 2 years after the initial surgery, but there is still a high risk of loss of correction in these patients. \n \n \nKey words: \nScoliosis; Kyphosis; Spinal fusion; Infection; Treatment outcome","PeriodicalId":36405,"journal":{"name":"中华骨科杂志","volume":"40 1","pages":"226-235"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华骨科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0253-2352.2020.04.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To investigate the incidence and management of deep surgical site infection(SSI) after the spinal deformity surgery. Methods This study retrospectively reviewed a consecutive cohort of 8818 patients with spinal deformity who received spinal deformity surgery between January1998 and December 2017 at our center. The diagnosis of deep SSI was based on the clinical symptoms, imaging data and laboratory findings. Early infection and late infection were defined as deep infections occurring 3 months after the initial procedure, respectively. All deep SSIs were first treated with irrigation and debridement, closed suction irrigation system and antibiotics. If the infection cannot be eradicated, dressing change is recommended within 2 years after the initial surgery. The instrumentation can be removed 2 years after the initial surgery with careful evaluation of the fusion mass. The posterior-anterior and lateral radiographs were used to measure the coronal parameters and sagittal alignment. Results Sixty patients were diagnosed as deep SSI after spinal deformity surgery, including 11 patients with early infection and 49 patients with late infection. No significant difference was observed in terms of age, gender ratio, surgical approach and fusion levels between the two groups. Deep SSI seemed to be more likely to occur between 2 and 5 years after surgery. Incidence of SSI was lowest in the patients with idiopathic scoliosis and ankylosing spondylitis, and highest in the patients with neuromuscular and syndromic scoliosis. There was a high rate of negative culture in the primary culture. Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli were the most common organisms in the early infection, while patients with late infection had a high rate of low-virulent skin flora. In the early infection group, nine patients retained instrumentation while the implants were removed 2 years after the primary surgery in 2 patients. In patients with late infection, instrumentation was retained in 5 cases and removed in 10 cases until 2 years after the primary surgery. 34 cases were infected 2 years after the primary surgery and the implants were removed directly. One patient underwent reoperation with instrumentation 1 month after implant removal, another patient underwent reoperation 3 years after implant removal due to progression of deformity. Significant loss of coronal correction was noted at the latest follow-up. Conclusion The rate of deep SSI after spinal deformity surgery was 0.68%, of which the incidence of early infection and delayed infection was 0.12% and 0.56%, respectively. An increased risk of SSI in patients with neuromuscular and syndromic scoliosis was noted. If the infection cannot be eradicated after repeated debridement, we recommend instrumentation removal 2 years after the initial surgery, but there is still a high risk of loss of correction in these patients. Key words: Scoliosis; Kyphosis; Spinal fusion; Infection; Treatment outcome
脊柱畸形手术后深部手术部位感染的发生率和处理:8188例单一机构病例
目的探讨脊柱畸形术后深部手术部位感染的发生率及处理方法。方法本研究回顾性分析了1998年1月至2017年12月在我中心接受脊柱畸形手术的8818名脊柱畸形患者的连续队列。深部SSI的诊断是基于临床症状、影像学数据和实验室检查结果。早期感染和晚期感染分别定义为初次手术后3个月发生的深度感染。所有深部SSI首先采用冲洗和清创术、封闭抽吸冲洗系统和抗生素进行治疗。如果感染无法根除,建议在初次手术后2年内更换敷料。可以在初次手术后2年内取出器械,仔细评估融合块。使用前后侧位X线片测量冠状面参数和矢状面排列。结果60例脊柱畸形术后诊断为深部SSI,其中早期感染11例,晚期感染49例。在年龄、性别比例、手术方式和融合水平方面,两组之间没有观察到显著差异。深部SSI似乎更有可能发生在手术后2至5年之间。SSI的发生率在特发性脊柱侧弯和强直性脊柱炎患者中最低,在神经肌肉性和综合征性脊柱侧侧凸患者中最高。在原代培养中,阴性培养率较高。金黄色葡萄球菌和大肠杆菌是早期感染最常见的生物体,而晚期感染患者的皮肤低毒力菌群比例较高。在早期感染组中,9名患者保留了器械,2名患者在初次手术后2年移除了植入物。在晚期感染患者中,5例保留了器械,10例移除器械,直到初次手术后2年。34例患者在初次手术后2年被感染,植入物被直接移除。一名患者在植入物移除后1个月接受了器械再次手术,另一名患者因畸形进展在植入物取出后3年接受了再次手术。在最近的随访中注意到冠状位矫正的显著损失。结论脊柱畸形术后深部SSI发生率为0.68%,其中早期感染和延迟感染的发生率分别为0.12%和0.56%。神经肌肉和综合征性脊柱侧弯患者发生SSI的风险增加。如果反复清创术后感染无法根除,我们建议在初次手术后2年取出器械,但这些患者仍有很高的矫正失败风险。关键词:脊柱侧弯;Kyphosis;脊柱融合术;感染;治疗结果
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
中华骨科杂志
中华骨科杂志 Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8153
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信