The Relationship between Word Difficulty and Frequency: A Response to Hashimoto (2021)

IF 1.4 2区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
J. Stewart, Joseph P. Vitta, Christopher Nicklin, Stuart Mclean, Geoffrey G. Pinchbeck, Brandon Kramer
{"title":"The Relationship between Word Difficulty and Frequency: A Response to Hashimoto (2021)","authors":"J. Stewart, Joseph P. Vitta, Christopher Nicklin, Stuart Mclean, Geoffrey G. Pinchbeck, Brandon Kramer","doi":"10.1080/15434303.2021.1992629","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Hashimoto (2021) reported a correlation of −.50 (r 2 = .25) between word frequency rank and difficulty, concluding the construct of modern vocabulary size tests is questionable. In this response we show that the relationship between frequency and difficulty is clear albeit non-linear and demonstrate that if a wider range of frequencies is tested and log transformations are applied, the correlation can approach .80. Finally, while we acknowledge the great promise of knowledge-based word lists, we note that a strong correlation between difficulty and frequency is not, in fact, the primary reason size tests are organized by frequency.","PeriodicalId":46873,"journal":{"name":"Language Assessment Quarterly","volume":"19 1","pages":"90 - 101"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Assessment Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2021.1992629","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

ABSTRACT Hashimoto (2021) reported a correlation of −.50 (r 2 = .25) between word frequency rank and difficulty, concluding the construct of modern vocabulary size tests is questionable. In this response we show that the relationship between frequency and difficulty is clear albeit non-linear and demonstrate that if a wider range of frequencies is tested and log transformations are applied, the correlation can approach .80. Finally, while we acknowledge the great promise of knowledge-based word lists, we note that a strong correlation between difficulty and frequency is not, in fact, the primary reason size tests are organized by frequency.
单词难度和频率之间的关系:对桥本的回应(2021)
摘要Hashimoto(2021)报道了词频等级和难度之间的相关性为−.50(r2=.25),得出的结论是现代词汇大小测试的结构值得怀疑。在这个响应中,我们表明频率和难度之间的关系是明确的,尽管是非线性的,并证明如果测试更宽的频率范围并应用对数变换,相关性可以接近.80。最后,虽然我们承认基于知识的单词表的巨大前景,但我们注意到,难度和频率之间的强相关性实际上并不是按频率组织大小测试的主要原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
22
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信