Participatory video and diagramming with disabled people in Burkina Faso

IF 1.9 2区 社会学 Q2 REHABILITATION
L. Bezzina
{"title":"Participatory video and diagramming with disabled people in Burkina Faso","authors":"L. Bezzina","doi":"10.1080/09687599.2022.2034599","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Disability research has made vast progress since Oliver’s (1992) call for it to challenge disabled people’s oppression. In Global South contexts such as Burkina Faso–where the research on which this paper is based was facilitated by the author–participatory diagramming and video are useful in creating spaces where disabled people can be heard. Nonetheless, these voices do not necessarily represent those of all disabled people. This paper tackles critiques of participatory methods, issues of representation, as well as power and positionality concerns arising from the involvement of western, non-disabled researchers. It ‘concludes’ that while participatory research might respond to the need for ethical research methods exploring disability in Global South contexts, the importance of reflexivity and of striving towards enabling and supporting research whose agenda is set by disabled persons from the Global South, should be at the fore. Points of Interest For the most part, research on disability and the lives of disabled persons takes place in Europe, North America and other similar contexts, and does not take into account the experiences of persons with disabilities in sub-Saharan Africa. Research which involves participants as researchers themselves aims to support disabled persons in fighting against the discrimination they encounter. Such research can involve different research methods, such as disabled persons creating their own film where they can make their voices heard. Methods like these are more ethical than traditional research methods like interviews, and help make visible the lives and experiences of persons with disabilities in countries like Burkina Faso. However, such participatory methods also have their drawbacks, some of which are discussed in this paper in order to reflect on the way forward for disability research in sub-Saharan Africa.","PeriodicalId":48208,"journal":{"name":"Disability & Society","volume":"38 1","pages":"1511 - 1533"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability & Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2022.2034599","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Disability research has made vast progress since Oliver’s (1992) call for it to challenge disabled people’s oppression. In Global South contexts such as Burkina Faso–where the research on which this paper is based was facilitated by the author–participatory diagramming and video are useful in creating spaces where disabled people can be heard. Nonetheless, these voices do not necessarily represent those of all disabled people. This paper tackles critiques of participatory methods, issues of representation, as well as power and positionality concerns arising from the involvement of western, non-disabled researchers. It ‘concludes’ that while participatory research might respond to the need for ethical research methods exploring disability in Global South contexts, the importance of reflexivity and of striving towards enabling and supporting research whose agenda is set by disabled persons from the Global South, should be at the fore. Points of Interest For the most part, research on disability and the lives of disabled persons takes place in Europe, North America and other similar contexts, and does not take into account the experiences of persons with disabilities in sub-Saharan Africa. Research which involves participants as researchers themselves aims to support disabled persons in fighting against the discrimination they encounter. Such research can involve different research methods, such as disabled persons creating their own film where they can make their voices heard. Methods like these are more ethical than traditional research methods like interviews, and help make visible the lives and experiences of persons with disabilities in countries like Burkina Faso. However, such participatory methods also have their drawbacks, some of which are discussed in this paper in order to reflect on the way forward for disability research in sub-Saharan Africa.
布基纳法索残疾人参与式视频和图表
摘要自从Oliver(1992)呼吁残疾研究挑战残疾人的压迫以来,残疾研究取得了巨大进展。在全球南方的背景下,如布基纳法索——本文所基于的研究是由作者推动的——参与式制图和视频有助于创造残疾人可以听到的空间。尽管如此,这些声音并不一定代表所有残疾人的声音。本文讨论了对参与方法、代表性问题以及西方非残疾研究人员参与所引起的权力和地位问题的批评。它“得出结论”,虽然参与性研究可能会满足在全球南方背景下探索残疾问题的伦理研究方法的需求,但反思性的重要性以及努力促进和支持议程由全球南方残疾人制定的研究的重要性应该放在首位。兴趣点在大多数情况下,关于残疾和残疾人生活的研究是在欧洲、北美和其他类似背景下进行的,没有考虑到撒哈拉以南非洲残疾人的经历。由参与者作为研究人员参与的研究旨在支持残疾人与他们遇到的歧视作斗争。这类研究可能涉及不同的研究方法,例如残疾人创作自己的电影,让人们听到他们的声音。这样的方法比采访等传统研究方法更符合伦理,有助于让人们了解布基纳法索等国残疾人的生活和经历。然而,这种参与式方法也有其缺点,本文对其中一些进行了讨论,以反思撒哈拉以南非洲残疾研究的前进方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
109
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信