Exploring the role of smartphone apps for livestock farmers: data management, extension and informed decision making

IF 2.9 4区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Penelope Schulz, Julian C Prior, L. Kahn, G. Hinch
{"title":"Exploring the role of smartphone apps for livestock farmers: data management, extension and informed decision making","authors":"Penelope Schulz, Julian C Prior, L. Kahn, G. Hinch","doi":"10.1080/1389224X.2021.1910524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Purpose This paper establishes the attitude of Australian livestock farmers toward the use of mobile applications (apps) in farmer extension, training and on-farm decision making. It also determines levels of technology adoption of smartphones and agriculture app use, as well as identifies factors that may influence app adoption. Methodology A quantitative approach was utilised in the analysis of data from four online surveys conducted in 2017 that were completed by a total 542 respondents. Findings Respondents had high levels of smartphone ownership and general app use but significantly lower agricultural app use. Surveys revealed a strong positive attitude and keenness to use apps. Making more informed decisions, increasing efficiency, and accessing and recording important information were the most important reasons for agricultural app use. Practical Implications Findings suggest a lack of relevant, useful, and easy to use apps for agriculture, or an issue with their value proposition. Theoretical Implications The perceived technology adoption gap amongst Australian livestock farmers could not be substantiated. Established fundamental factors influencing technology adoption are relevant for agricultural app adoption, but other factors appear to be less relevant and there are new motivators to consider. Originality/Value There is little peer-reviewed information on the adoption and use of agricultural apps by Australian farmers and a perception that farmers have lower levels of smartphone and app use. This paper assesses technology adoption levels and considers the farmer perspective in identifying factors influencing adoption.","PeriodicalId":46772,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Education & Extension","volume":"28 1","pages":"93 - 114"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/1389224X.2021.1910524","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agricultural Education & Extension","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2021.1910524","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

ABSTRACT Purpose This paper establishes the attitude of Australian livestock farmers toward the use of mobile applications (apps) in farmer extension, training and on-farm decision making. It also determines levels of technology adoption of smartphones and agriculture app use, as well as identifies factors that may influence app adoption. Methodology A quantitative approach was utilised in the analysis of data from four online surveys conducted in 2017 that were completed by a total 542 respondents. Findings Respondents had high levels of smartphone ownership and general app use but significantly lower agricultural app use. Surveys revealed a strong positive attitude and keenness to use apps. Making more informed decisions, increasing efficiency, and accessing and recording important information were the most important reasons for agricultural app use. Practical Implications Findings suggest a lack of relevant, useful, and easy to use apps for agriculture, or an issue with their value proposition. Theoretical Implications The perceived technology adoption gap amongst Australian livestock farmers could not be substantiated. Established fundamental factors influencing technology adoption are relevant for agricultural app adoption, but other factors appear to be less relevant and there are new motivators to consider. Originality/Value There is little peer-reviewed information on the adoption and use of agricultural apps by Australian farmers and a perception that farmers have lower levels of smartphone and app use. This paper assesses technology adoption levels and considers the farmer perspective in identifying factors influencing adoption.
探索智能手机应用程序在畜牧业农民中的作用:数据管理、扩展和知情决策
摘要目的本文确立了澳大利亚畜牧业农民对在农民推广、培训和农场决策中使用移动应用程序的态度。它还确定了智能手机和农业应用程序的技术采用水平,并确定了可能影响应用程序采用的因素。方法在分析2017年进行的四项在线调查的数据时采用了定量方法,共有542名受访者完成了这些调查。调查结果受访者拥有较高水平的智能手机和一般应用程序,但农业应用程序的使用率明显较低。调查显示,人们对应用程序的使用态度和热情非常积极。做出更明智的决策、提高效率以及访问和记录重要信息是使用农业应用程序的最重要原因。实际意义研究结果表明,缺乏相关、有用和易于使用的农业应用程序,或者其价值主张存在问题。理论含义澳大利亚畜牧业农民之间的技术采用差距无法得到证实。影响技术采用的既定基本因素与农业应用程序的采用有关,但其他因素似乎不太相关,需要考虑新的激励因素。原创性/价值关于澳大利亚农民采用和使用农业应用程序的同行评审信息很少,人们认为农民的智能手机和应用程序使用水平较低。本文评估了技术采用水平,并在确定影响技术采用的因素时考虑了农民的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
28.60%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: The Journal of Agricultural Education & Extension is published to inform experts who do or use research on agricultural education and extension about research conducted in this field worldwide. Information about this research is needed to improve policies, strategies, methods and practices for agricultural education and extension. The Journal of Agricultural Education & Extension accepts authorative and well-referenced scientific articles within the field of agricultural education and extension after a double-blind peer review process. Agricultural education and extension faces profound change, and therefore its core area of attention is moving towards communication, competence development and performance improvement for a wide variety of fields and audiences, most of which can be studied from a multi-disciplinary perspective, including: -Communication for Development- Competence Management and Development- Corporate Social Responsibility and Human Resource Development- Design and Implementation of Competence–based Education- Environmental and Natural Resource Management- Entrepreneurship and Learning- Facilitating Multiple-Stakeholder Processes- Health and Society- Innovation of Agricultural-Technical Education- Innovation Systems and Learning- Integrated Rural Development- Interdisciplinary and Social Learning- Learning, Conflict and Decision Making- Poverty Reduction- Performance Improvement- Sustainable Agricultural Production
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信