Linear stapled technique for robotic assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy

G. Boxel, N. Carter, B. Knight, V. Fajksova, N. Jenkins, K. Akbari, S. Mercer
{"title":"Linear stapled technique for robotic assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy","authors":"G. Boxel, N. Carter, B. Knight, V. Fajksova, N. Jenkins, K. Akbari, S. Mercer","doi":"10.21037/AOE-21-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Robotic assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) is gaining increased popularity for the surgical treatment of esophageal cancer. Following resection of the specimen an anastomosis is formed between the gastric conduit, formed from the stomach, and the remaining esophagus. The method used for constructing this anastomosis varies widely between units—broadly speaking surgeons use a circular stapled, linear stapled or handsewn technique. Methods: Using a prospectively maintained database, we reviewed the first consecutive 30 RAMIE cases performed at our Centre. Outcomes, with particular focus on the anastomosis, were reviewed. We also describe in detail the technical steps involved in the formation of a fully robotic linear stapled, side-to-side, anastomosis. Results: We report on the first 30 patients undergoing RAMIE at our Centre, all of whom had a robotic linear stapled anastomosis. The patient characteristics were comparable to similar cancer cohorts reported on previously in terms of disease stage, age, sex and neoadjuvant treatment. Thirty- and 90-day mortality was 0%. The technique appears to have a steep learning curve with a 50% leak rate in the first 10 cases, reducing to 15% in the subsequent 20 cases. Conclusions: Robotic linear stapled anastomosis following esophagectomy is safe and feasible. The apparent learning curve appears similar to handsewn and circular stapled techniques.","PeriodicalId":72217,"journal":{"name":"Annals of esophagus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of esophagus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/AOE-21-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Robotic assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) is gaining increased popularity for the surgical treatment of esophageal cancer. Following resection of the specimen an anastomosis is formed between the gastric conduit, formed from the stomach, and the remaining esophagus. The method used for constructing this anastomosis varies widely between units—broadly speaking surgeons use a circular stapled, linear stapled or handsewn technique. Methods: Using a prospectively maintained database, we reviewed the first consecutive 30 RAMIE cases performed at our Centre. Outcomes, with particular focus on the anastomosis, were reviewed. We also describe in detail the technical steps involved in the formation of a fully robotic linear stapled, side-to-side, anastomosis. Results: We report on the first 30 patients undergoing RAMIE at our Centre, all of whom had a robotic linear stapled anastomosis. The patient characteristics were comparable to similar cancer cohorts reported on previously in terms of disease stage, age, sex and neoadjuvant treatment. Thirty- and 90-day mortality was 0%. The technique appears to have a steep learning curve with a 50% leak rate in the first 10 cases, reducing to 15% in the subsequent 20 cases. Conclusions: Robotic linear stapled anastomosis following esophagectomy is safe and feasible. The apparent learning curve appears similar to handsewn and circular stapled techniques.
线性吻合器技术在机器人辅助微创食管切除术中的应用
背景:机器人辅助微创食管切除术(RAMIE)在食管癌症的外科治疗中越来越受欢迎。切除标本后,在由胃形成的胃导管和剩余的食道之间形成吻合。构建这种吻合的方法在不同的单位之间有很大的不同——广义上说,外科医生使用圆形缝合、线性缝合或手工缝合技术。方法:使用前瞻性维护的数据库,我们回顾了在我们中心进行的连续30例RAMIE病例。对结果进行了回顾,特别是吻合。我们还详细描述了形成全机器人线性缝合器、侧对侧吻合所涉及的技术步骤。结果:我们报告了在我们中心接受RAMIE的前30名患者,他们都进行了机器人线性缝合吻合。在疾病分期、年龄、性别和新辅助治疗方面,患者特征与之前报道的类似癌症队列相当。30天和90天的死亡率为0%。该技术似乎有一个陡峭的学习曲线,在前10例中泄漏率为50%,在随后的20例中降至15%。结论:食管切除术后机器人直线吻合是安全可行的。明显的学习曲线看起来类似于手工缝合和圆形缝合技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信