Incarceration during a pandemic: A catalyst for extending the conceptual terrain of occupational deprivation

IF 2.4 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Elizabeth M. Phelps, R. Aldrich
{"title":"Incarceration during a pandemic: A catalyst for extending the conceptual terrain of occupational deprivation","authors":"Elizabeth M. Phelps, R. Aldrich","doi":"10.1080/14427591.2022.2060286","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Previous occupational science and occupational therapy literature has framed the consequences of occupational deprivation in relation to its long-term health and societal effects; however, the COVID-19 pandemic has illuminated the swift and life-threatening repercussions of occupational deprivation and the structural factors that perpetuate it for marginalized populations. In this discussion paper, we show how the intentional design of prisons around occupational deprivation has made incarcerated individuals particularly vulnerable to infection during the COVID-19 pandemic. We argue that public health recommendations designed to control the spread of disease, which require people to adapt their occupations and engage in health preserving occupations, conflict with the structure of prisons. On that basis, we propose the need for a broader understanding of occupational deprivation and the life-threatening effects it can have. We further argue for an expansion of existing conceptualizations to consider the immediacy of the consequences of occupational deprivation. We suggest that this more comprehensive understanding will provide a stronger foundation and greater urgency for advocacy efforts aimed at making structural changes.","PeriodicalId":51542,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational Science","volume":"29 1","pages":"430 - 440"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Occupational Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2022.2060286","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Previous occupational science and occupational therapy literature has framed the consequences of occupational deprivation in relation to its long-term health and societal effects; however, the COVID-19 pandemic has illuminated the swift and life-threatening repercussions of occupational deprivation and the structural factors that perpetuate it for marginalized populations. In this discussion paper, we show how the intentional design of prisons around occupational deprivation has made incarcerated individuals particularly vulnerable to infection during the COVID-19 pandemic. We argue that public health recommendations designed to control the spread of disease, which require people to adapt their occupations and engage in health preserving occupations, conflict with the structure of prisons. On that basis, we propose the need for a broader understanding of occupational deprivation and the life-threatening effects it can have. We further argue for an expansion of existing conceptualizations to consider the immediacy of the consequences of occupational deprivation. We suggest that this more comprehensive understanding will provide a stronger foundation and greater urgency for advocacy efforts aimed at making structural changes.
疫情期间的监禁:扩大职业剥夺概念范围的催化剂
先前的职业科学和职业治疗文献已经将职业剥夺的后果与其长期健康和社会影响联系起来;然而,新冠肺炎大流行揭示了职业剥夺的迅速和危及生命的影响,以及使其对边缘化人口长期存在的结构性因素。在这篇讨论论文中,我们展示了围绕职业剥夺的监狱故意设计如何使被监禁的人在新冠肺炎大流行期间特别容易受到感染。我们认为,旨在控制疾病传播的公共卫生建议与监狱结构相冲突,这些建议要求人们适应自己的职业并从事健康保护职业。在此基础上,我们建议有必要更广泛地了解职业剥夺及其可能产生的危及生命的影响。我们进一步主张扩大现有的概念,以考虑职业剥夺后果的直接性。我们建议,这种更全面的理解将为旨在进行结构改革的宣传工作提供更坚实的基础和更大的紧迫性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Occupational Science
Journal of Occupational Science SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
41.70%
发文量
46
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信