INSTRUMEN RATIFIKASI PERJANJIAN PERDAGANGAN INTERNASIONAL: REZIM PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 13/PUU-XVI/2018

Prita Amalia, Garry Gumelar Pratama, Wahyu Agung Laksono, Anindya Saraswati Ardiwinata
{"title":"INSTRUMEN RATIFIKASI PERJANJIAN PERDAGANGAN INTERNASIONAL: REZIM PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 13/PUU-XVI/2018","authors":"Prita Amalia, Garry Gumelar Pratama, Wahyu Agung Laksono, Anindya Saraswati Ardiwinata","doi":"10.25123/vej.v9i1.5714","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The intrusive character inherent in international trade agreements makes the particular form of the treaty unique compared to other treaties. The trade agreements' intrusiveness means the treaty impacts individual rights relatively more than other treaties on its implementation. Confirming such a particular character, the Indonesian Constitutional Court, via its Decision No. 13/PUU-XVI/2018, provides additional criteria for the treaty ratified through an act, in addition to the general forms of treaties. This study comprehensively discusses the consistency of the instrument form and the clarity of the reference regulations related to the procedure for ratifying the international trade agreement in Indonesia after the ruling of the 2018 Constitutional Court Decision. This study uses a normative juridical approach by making a library of data covering principles, laws, and regulations or legal theories relevant to research as the main material. The study shows that Constitutional Court Decision No. 13/PUU-XVI/2018 has allowed the international trade agreement to be ratified consistently using a legislative act replacing the past practice of using a presidential act. Moreover, the provisions on international trade agreements ratification under Indonesian trade law and Indonesian treaty law must be enforced using \"lex specialis derogat lex generalis\" principle. Although they share the same norms after the Constitutional Court's Decision 13/2018, specific provisions under the trade law prevail over the general provisions of the Indonesian treaty law.","PeriodicalId":32446,"journal":{"name":"Veritas et Justitia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veritas et Justitia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25123/vej.v9i1.5714","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The intrusive character inherent in international trade agreements makes the particular form of the treaty unique compared to other treaties. The trade agreements' intrusiveness means the treaty impacts individual rights relatively more than other treaties on its implementation. Confirming such a particular character, the Indonesian Constitutional Court, via its Decision No. 13/PUU-XVI/2018, provides additional criteria for the treaty ratified through an act, in addition to the general forms of treaties. This study comprehensively discusses the consistency of the instrument form and the clarity of the reference regulations related to the procedure for ratifying the international trade agreement in Indonesia after the ruling of the 2018 Constitutional Court Decision. This study uses a normative juridical approach by making a library of data covering principles, laws, and regulations or legal theories relevant to research as the main material. The study shows that Constitutional Court Decision No. 13/PUU-XVI/2018 has allowed the international trade agreement to be ratified consistently using a legislative act replacing the past practice of using a presidential act. Moreover, the provisions on international trade agreements ratification under Indonesian trade law and Indonesian treaty law must be enforced using "lex specialis derogat lex generalis" principle. Although they share the same norms after the Constitutional Court's Decision 13/2018, specific provisions under the trade law prevail over the general provisions of the Indonesian treaty law.
国际贸易营销授权文书批准:章程决定审查编号13/PUU-XVI/2018
与其他条约相比,国际贸易协定固有的侵入性使该条约的特定形式具有独特性。贸易协定的侵入性意味着该条约对个人权利的影响相对大于其他条约对其执行的影响。印度尼西亚宪法法院通过其第13/PUU-XVI/2018号决定确认了这一特殊性质,除一般形式的条约外,还为通过法案批准的条约提供了额外的标准。本研究全面讨论了2018年宪法法院裁决后,与印度尼西亚批准国际贸易协定程序相关的文书形式的一致性和参考法规的明确性。本研究采用规范的司法方法,将涵盖与研究相关的原则、法律法规或法律理论的数据库作为主要材料。研究表明,宪法法院2018年第13/PUU-XVI/2018号决定允许通过立法法案批准国际贸易协定,取代了过去使用总统法案的做法。此外,根据印度尼西亚贸易法和印度尼西亚条约法关于批准国际贸易协定的规定,必须使用“特别法减损一般法”原则加以执行。尽管在宪法法院2018年第13号裁决后,它们有着相同的规范,但贸易法的具体规定优先于印度尼西亚条约法的一般规定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信