Measurement Invariance of the Intelligence and Development Scales – 2 Across Language Versions, Gender, and Age

IF 3.2 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
Silvia Grieder, L. Visser, M. Timmerman, A. Grob
{"title":"Measurement Invariance of the Intelligence and Development Scales – 2 Across Language Versions, Gender, and Age","authors":"Silvia Grieder, L. Visser, M. Timmerman, A. Grob","doi":"10.1027/1015-5759/a000771","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: We examined the factor structure and measurement invariance of the intelligence and basic skills domains of the Intelligence and Development Scales – 2 (IDS-2) with the Dutch ( N = 1,665) and German ( N = 1,672) standardization samples. First, we tested five competing models using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) on the Dutch data: two empirically based, derived earlier from the German data, and three theoretically based (IDS-2 and two Cattell–Horn–Carroll-based). Subsequently, we evaluated the measurement invariance of the final model across the Dutch and German versions and gender using multiple-group CFA and across age using local structural equation modeling. A second-order model with six first-order factors best represented the Dutch IDS-2 structure. Five IDS-2 factors were confirmed, but Visual Processing and Abstract Reasoning, and the intelligence and basic skills domains were not separable. This model displayed full invariance across the language versions and was largely invariant across gender and age (7–20 years). Thus, scores derived according to this model are comparable across these language versions, gender, and age. The strong general intelligence factor and weak broad ability factors ask for precaution when basing clinical interpretation on the broad ability factors.","PeriodicalId":48018,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Psychological Assessment","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Psychological Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000771","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: We examined the factor structure and measurement invariance of the intelligence and basic skills domains of the Intelligence and Development Scales – 2 (IDS-2) with the Dutch ( N = 1,665) and German ( N = 1,672) standardization samples. First, we tested five competing models using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) on the Dutch data: two empirically based, derived earlier from the German data, and three theoretically based (IDS-2 and two Cattell–Horn–Carroll-based). Subsequently, we evaluated the measurement invariance of the final model across the Dutch and German versions and gender using multiple-group CFA and across age using local structural equation modeling. A second-order model with six first-order factors best represented the Dutch IDS-2 structure. Five IDS-2 factors were confirmed, but Visual Processing and Abstract Reasoning, and the intelligence and basic skills domains were not separable. This model displayed full invariance across the language versions and was largely invariant across gender and age (7–20 years). Thus, scores derived according to this model are comparable across these language versions, gender, and age. The strong general intelligence factor and weak broad ability factors ask for precaution when basing clinical interpretation on the broad ability factors.
智力和发展量表的测量不变性——2跨语言版本、性别和年龄
摘要:我们用荷兰(N=1665)和德国(N=1672)标准化样本检验了智力与发展量表-2(IDS-2)智力和基本技能领域的因子结构和测量不变性。首先,我们在荷兰数据上使用验证性因素分析(CFA)测试了五个竞争模型:两个基于经验,早期从德国数据得出,三个基于理论(IDS-2和两个基于Cattell–Horn–Carroll)。随后,我们使用多组CFA和使用局部结构方程建模评估了最终模型在荷兰和德国版本和性别之间的测量不变性。具有六个一阶因子的二阶模型最能代表荷兰IDS-2结构。五个IDS-2因素得到了证实,但视觉处理和抽象推理以及智力和基本技能领域是不可分离的。该模型在语言版本中表现出完全的不变性,并且在性别和年龄(7-20岁)之间基本不变。因此,根据该模型得出的分数在这些语言版本、性别和年龄之间具有可比性。一般智力因素强,广义能力因素弱,在以广义能力因素为基础进行临床解释时需要注意。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
71
期刊介绍: The main purpose of the EJPA is to present important articles which provide seminal information on both theoretical and applied developments in this field. Articles reporting the construction of new measures or an advancement of an existing measure are given priority. The journal is directed to practitioners as well as to academicians: The conviction of its editors is that the discipline of psychological assessment should, necessarily and firmly, be attached to the roots of psychological science, while going deeply into all the consequences of its applied, practice-oriented development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信