Determining the requirements of a medical records electronic deficiency management system: a mixed-method study

IF 0.8 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Farzad Salmanizadeh, A. Ameri, L. Ahmadian, Mahboubeh Mirmohammadi, Reza Khajouei
{"title":"Determining the requirements of a medical records electronic deficiency management system: a mixed-method study","authors":"Farzad Salmanizadeh, A. Ameri, L. Ahmadian, Mahboubeh Mirmohammadi, Reza Khajouei","doi":"10.1108/rmj-02-2022-0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nDespite the presence of electronic medical records systems, traditional paper-based methods are often used in many countries to document data and eliminate medical record deficiencies. These methods waste patient and hospital resources. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the traditional deficiency management system and determine the requirements of an electronic deficiency management system in settings that currently use paper records alongside electronic hospital information systems.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis mixed-method study was performed in three phases. First, the traditional process of medical records deficiency management was qualitatively evaluated. Second, the accuracy of identifying deficiencies by the traditional and redesigned checklists was compared. Third, the requirements for an electronic deficiency management system were discussed in focus group sessions.\n\n\nFindings\nProblems in the traditional system include inadequate guidelines, incomplete procedures for evaluating sheets and subsequent delays in activities. Problems also included the omission of some vital data elements and a lack of feedback about the documentation deficiencies of each documenter. There was a significant difference between the mean number of deficiencies identified by traditional and redesigned checklists (p < 0.0001). The authors proposed an electronic deficiency management system based on redesigned checklists with improved functionalities such as discriminating deficiencies based on the documenter’s role, providing systematic feedback and generating automatic reports.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nPrevious studies only examined the positive effect of audit and feedback methods to enhance the documentation of data elements in electronic and paper medical records. The authors propose an electronic deficiency management system for medical records to solve those problems. Health-care policymakers, hospital managers and health information systems developers can use the proposed system to manage deficiencies and improve medical records documentation.\n","PeriodicalId":20923,"journal":{"name":"Records Management Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Records Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/rmj-02-2022-0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose Despite the presence of electronic medical records systems, traditional paper-based methods are often used in many countries to document data and eliminate medical record deficiencies. These methods waste patient and hospital resources. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the traditional deficiency management system and determine the requirements of an electronic deficiency management system in settings that currently use paper records alongside electronic hospital information systems. Design/methodology/approach This mixed-method study was performed in three phases. First, the traditional process of medical records deficiency management was qualitatively evaluated. Second, the accuracy of identifying deficiencies by the traditional and redesigned checklists was compared. Third, the requirements for an electronic deficiency management system were discussed in focus group sessions. Findings Problems in the traditional system include inadequate guidelines, incomplete procedures for evaluating sheets and subsequent delays in activities. Problems also included the omission of some vital data elements and a lack of feedback about the documentation deficiencies of each documenter. There was a significant difference between the mean number of deficiencies identified by traditional and redesigned checklists (p < 0.0001). The authors proposed an electronic deficiency management system based on redesigned checklists with improved functionalities such as discriminating deficiencies based on the documenter’s role, providing systematic feedback and generating automatic reports. Originality/value Previous studies only examined the positive effect of audit and feedback methods to enhance the documentation of data elements in electronic and paper medical records. The authors propose an electronic deficiency management system for medical records to solve those problems. Health-care policymakers, hospital managers and health information systems developers can use the proposed system to manage deficiencies and improve medical records documentation.
确定医疗记录电子缺陷管理系统的要求:一项混合方法研究
目的尽管存在电子医疗记录系统,但许多国家经常使用传统的纸质方法来记录数据并消除医疗记录的不足。这些方法浪费了病人和医院的资源。本研究的目的是评估传统的缺陷管理系统,并确定在目前使用纸质记录和电子医院信息系统的环境中对电子缺陷管理系统的要求。设计/方法论/方法这项混合方法研究分三个阶段进行。首先,对传统的病历缺陷管理流程进行了定性评价。其次,比较了传统检查表和重新设计的检查表识别缺陷的准确性。第三,在重点小组会议上讨论了电子缺陷管理系统的要求。发现传统系统中的问题包括指导方针不充分、评估表格的程序不完整以及随后的活动延迟。问题还包括遗漏了一些重要的数据元素,以及缺乏对每个文件编制者的文件缺陷的反馈。传统检查表和重新设计的检查表发现的缺陷平均数量之间存在显著差异(p<0.0001)。作者提出了一个基于重新设计的清单的电子缺陷管理系统,该系统具有改进的功能,如根据文件员的角色识别缺陷、提供系统反馈和生成自动报告。原创性/价值以前的研究只考察了审计和反馈方法对增强电子和纸质医疗记录中数据元素文档的积极影响。为了解决这些问题,作者提出了一个电子病历缺陷管理系统。卫生保健政策制定者、医院管理人员和卫生信息系统开发人员可以使用拟议的系统来管理缺陷并改进医疗记录文档。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Records Management Journal
Records Management Journal INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: ■Electronic records management ■Effect of government policies on record management ■Strategic developments in both the public and private sectors ■Systems design and implementation ■Models for records management ■Best practice, standards and guidelines ■Risk management and business continuity ■Performance measurement ■Continuing professional development ■Consortia and co-operation ■Marketing ■Preservation ■Legal and ethical issues
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信