T. J. Pempel and Keiichi Tsunekawa, eds. Two Crises, Different Outcomes: East Asia and Global Finance

IF 0.4 Q3 AREA STUDIES
W. Bello
{"title":"T. J. Pempel and Keiichi Tsunekawa, eds. Two Crises, Different Outcomes: East Asia and Global Finance","authors":"W. Bello","doi":"10.20495/SEAS.6.1_178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Two Crises, Different Outcomes: East Asia and Global Finance T. J. Pempel and Keiichi Tsunekawa, eds. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2015, viii+267pp.More Financial Crises Ahead?Two Crises, Different Outcomes: East Asia and Global Finance makes three key assertions: first, contrary to the school attributing the Asian financial crisis to \"crony capitalism,\" the debacle of 1997-98 was due largely to unregulated capital flows that flooded the region then quickly fled at the onset of the macroeconomic distortions they had brought about.Second, the United States and Europe could have avoided the financial collapse of 2008-09 had they learned the right lessons from the Asian financial crisis and strengthened instead of dismantling or weakening their systems of financial regulation.Third, learning from the Asian financial crisis, the East Asian economies took steps to prevent a rerun of that crisis, including making currency swap arrangements, limiting their exposure to new financial products like credit default swaps, and, above all, building up massive financial reserves derived from intensified export-intensive trade strategies. These measures insulated them from the 2008-09 global financial crisis.To be sure, these three arguments have been made by others in the academic and political debates that followed both crises. But it is worth restating them cogently and with strong empirical backing, as the book does. Moreover, the essays on the region's different economies provide important nuances to the book's central arguments. For instance, Yasunobu Okabe's paper on Korea and Thailand claims that in contrast to Thailand, Korea's post-Asian financial crisis regulation of capital flows to foreign bank branches was quite lenient, and this nearly brought Korea to its knees again in 2008; the country was saved from \"a second financial crisis through a $30 billion currency swap approved by the US Federal Reserve Board in October 2008\" (p. 105). Had Korea had a second financial collapse, who knows what the knock-on effects on the region might have been? We might now be writing on how the East Asian region was drawn into the maelstrom of the global financial crisis.Some of the essays provide us with interesting insights into the institutional contexts of the different countries' responses to the two crises. Barry Naughton, in his essay on China, says that while the response of the Chinese government-the rolling out of a stimulus program-was superficially similar in both the Asian financial crisis and the global financial crisis-the institutional contexts were different. During the Asian financial crisis, the stimulus was intended by reformoriented Prime Minister Zhu Ronji to be an emergency measure within a liberalizing trend, while during the global financial crisis it was part of a return to greater state intervention under the Hu Jintao-Wen Jiabao leadership.In varying degrees the different authors make the point that while East Asia may have dodged the bullet during the global financial crisis, it is not out of the woods. In fact, not only is the era of high growth over, but structural crises are catching up with the different economies of the region. Building up financial reserves via vigorous export drives and largely staying away from Wall Street's dangerous financial innovations like securitized mortgages and \"credit default swaps\" may have saved the Asian economies from the worst effects of the global financial crisis, but their deeper problems remain unresolved-problems stemming largely from the region's integration into the global economy.What are these problems? As the essays make clear, though the Asian economies have structural similarities, each of them has its unique configuration of challenges. Japan, Tsunekawa points out, cannot seem to shake off its quarter of a century of stagnation owing to pendulum swings between neoliberal reform advocated by reform technocrats and increased public spending in response to electoral pressures. …","PeriodicalId":42525,"journal":{"name":"Southeast Asian Studies","volume":"6 1","pages":"178-183"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southeast Asian Studies","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20495/SEAS.6.1_178","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Two Crises, Different Outcomes: East Asia and Global Finance T. J. Pempel and Keiichi Tsunekawa, eds. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2015, viii+267pp.More Financial Crises Ahead?Two Crises, Different Outcomes: East Asia and Global Finance makes three key assertions: first, contrary to the school attributing the Asian financial crisis to "crony capitalism," the debacle of 1997-98 was due largely to unregulated capital flows that flooded the region then quickly fled at the onset of the macroeconomic distortions they had brought about.Second, the United States and Europe could have avoided the financial collapse of 2008-09 had they learned the right lessons from the Asian financial crisis and strengthened instead of dismantling or weakening their systems of financial regulation.Third, learning from the Asian financial crisis, the East Asian economies took steps to prevent a rerun of that crisis, including making currency swap arrangements, limiting their exposure to new financial products like credit default swaps, and, above all, building up massive financial reserves derived from intensified export-intensive trade strategies. These measures insulated them from the 2008-09 global financial crisis.To be sure, these three arguments have been made by others in the academic and political debates that followed both crises. But it is worth restating them cogently and with strong empirical backing, as the book does. Moreover, the essays on the region's different economies provide important nuances to the book's central arguments. For instance, Yasunobu Okabe's paper on Korea and Thailand claims that in contrast to Thailand, Korea's post-Asian financial crisis regulation of capital flows to foreign bank branches was quite lenient, and this nearly brought Korea to its knees again in 2008; the country was saved from "a second financial crisis through a $30 billion currency swap approved by the US Federal Reserve Board in October 2008" (p. 105). Had Korea had a second financial collapse, who knows what the knock-on effects on the region might have been? We might now be writing on how the East Asian region was drawn into the maelstrom of the global financial crisis.Some of the essays provide us with interesting insights into the institutional contexts of the different countries' responses to the two crises. Barry Naughton, in his essay on China, says that while the response of the Chinese government-the rolling out of a stimulus program-was superficially similar in both the Asian financial crisis and the global financial crisis-the institutional contexts were different. During the Asian financial crisis, the stimulus was intended by reformoriented Prime Minister Zhu Ronji to be an emergency measure within a liberalizing trend, while during the global financial crisis it was part of a return to greater state intervention under the Hu Jintao-Wen Jiabao leadership.In varying degrees the different authors make the point that while East Asia may have dodged the bullet during the global financial crisis, it is not out of the woods. In fact, not only is the era of high growth over, but structural crises are catching up with the different economies of the region. Building up financial reserves via vigorous export drives and largely staying away from Wall Street's dangerous financial innovations like securitized mortgages and "credit default swaps" may have saved the Asian economies from the worst effects of the global financial crisis, but their deeper problems remain unresolved-problems stemming largely from the region's integration into the global economy.What are these problems? As the essays make clear, though the Asian economies have structural similarities, each of them has its unique configuration of challenges. Japan, Tsunekawa points out, cannot seem to shake off its quarter of a century of stagnation owing to pendulum swings between neoliberal reform advocated by reform technocrats and increased public spending in response to electoral pressures. …
彭培尔、津川敬一主编:《两次危机,不同的结果:东亚与全球金融》
两次危机,不同的结果:东亚和全球金融T.J.Pempel和Keiichi Tsunekawa编辑。伊萨卡:康奈尔大学出版社,2015,viii+267pp.未来还会有更多的金融危机?两次危机,不同的结果:东亚和全球金融提出了三个关键的断言:首先,与将亚洲金融危机归因于“裙带资本主义”的学派相反,1997-98年的崩溃主要是由于不受监管的资本流动涌入该地区,然后在它们带来的宏观经济扭曲开始时迅速逃离。其次,如果美国和欧洲从亚洲金融危机中吸取正确的教训,加强而不是废除或削弱其金融监管体系,它们本可以避免2008-09年的金融崩溃。第三,东亚经济体从亚洲金融危机中吸取教训,采取措施防止危机再次爆发,包括制定货币互换安排,限制其对信用违约互换等新金融产品的敞口,最重要的是,通过强化出口密集型贸易战略建立巨额金融储备。这些措施使他们免受2008-09年全球金融危机的影响。可以肯定的是,在这两次危机之后的学术和政治辩论中,其他人也提出了这三个论点。但值得像这本书一样,在强有力的经验支持下,有说服力地重述它们。此外,关于该地区不同经济体的文章为本书的核心论点提供了重要的细微差别。例如,冈部康信关于韩国和泰国的论文声称,与泰国相比,韩国在亚洲金融危机后对外国银行分行资本流动的监管相当宽松,这几乎使韩国在2008年再次屈服;2008年10月,美国联邦储备委员会批准了300亿美元的货币互换,使该国免于“第二次金融危机”(第105页)。如果韩国发生了第二次金融崩溃,谁知道会对该地区产生什么样的连锁反应?我们现在可能正在写东亚地区是如何被卷入全球金融危机的漩涡的。其中一些文章为我们提供了对不同国家应对这两次危机的制度背景的有趣见解。Barry Naughton在其关于中国的文章中表示,尽管中国政府对推出刺激计划的反应在亚洲金融危机和全球金融危机中表面上相似,但制度背景不同。在亚洲金融危机期间,以改革为导向的总理朱镕基打算将刺激措施作为自由化趋势中的一项紧急措施,而在全球金融危机期间这是在胡锦涛和温家宝领导下恢复更大的国家干预的一部分。不同的作者在不同程度上指出,尽管东亚可能在全球金融危机中躲过了一劫,但它并没有走出困境。事实上,不仅高增长时代已经结束,而且该地区不同经济体也面临着结构性危机。通过大力出口建立金融储备,并在很大程度上远离华尔街危险的金融创新,如证券化抵押贷款和“信用违约掉期”,可能使亚洲经济体免受全球金融危机的最严重影响,但它们更深层次的问题仍未解决,这些问题主要源于该地区融入全球经济。这些问题是什么?正如这些文章所表明的那样,尽管亚洲经济体在结构上有相似之处,但每一个经济体都有其独特的挑战。Tsunekawa指出,由于改革技术官僚倡导的新自由主义改革和为应对选举压力而增加的公共支出之间的摇摆,日本似乎无法摆脱25年来的停滞…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Southeast Asian Studies
Southeast Asian Studies AREA STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
25.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The new journal aims to promote excellent, agenda-setting scholarship and provide a forum for dialogue and collaboration both within and beyond the region. Southeast Asian Studies engages in wide-ranging and in-depth discussions that are attuned to the issues, debates, and imperatives within the region, while affirming the importance of learning and sharing ideas on a cross-country, global, and historical scale. An integral part of the journal’s mandate is to foster scholarship that is capable of bridging the continuing divide in area studies between the social sciences and humanities, on the one hand, and the natural sciences, on the other hand. To this end, the journal welcomes accessibly written articles that build on insights and cutting-edge research from the natural sciences. The journal also publishes research reports, which are shorter but fully peer-reviewed articles that present original findings or new concepts that result from specific research projects or outcomes of research collaboration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信