Cohesive devices in argumentative essays by Indonesian EFL learners

Meyga Agustia Nindya, Utami Widiati
{"title":"Cohesive devices in argumentative essays by Indonesian EFL learners","authors":"Meyga Agustia Nindya, Utami Widiati","doi":"10.23971/JEFL.V10I2.1949","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cohesive devices are essential elements that have long been recognized as important features of good writing. However, making use of them appropriately is viewed as problematic for learners. This descriptive qualitative study aimed to investigate Indonesian EFL learners' ability to use cohesive devices in their writings. Twenty EFL learners of a state university in Malang, East Java, Indonesia were required to write and send one piece of argumentative essay consisting of five paragraphs to be analyzed. Twenty essays were analyzed by identifying the number of correct and errors of grammatical cohesion. The errors were then evaluated to know the possible causes that contributed to the learners' errors. The results showed that the total number of grammatical cohesion used by the learners was 2386, while 175 of them performed errors. It was also found that there was a heavy reliance on the use of particular cohesive items. The intralingual transfer mostly caused the errors made by learners. This implied a need for writing teachers to apply strategies for the development of EFL learners' writing ability, such as exposing students to exercises, using collaborative learning, giving feedback, and using the learning management system.","PeriodicalId":31243,"journal":{"name":"Journal on English as a Foreign Language","volume":"10 1","pages":"337-358"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal on English as a Foreign Language","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23971/JEFL.V10I2.1949","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Cohesive devices are essential elements that have long been recognized as important features of good writing. However, making use of them appropriately is viewed as problematic for learners. This descriptive qualitative study aimed to investigate Indonesian EFL learners' ability to use cohesive devices in their writings. Twenty EFL learners of a state university in Malang, East Java, Indonesia were required to write and send one piece of argumentative essay consisting of five paragraphs to be analyzed. Twenty essays were analyzed by identifying the number of correct and errors of grammatical cohesion. The errors were then evaluated to know the possible causes that contributed to the learners' errors. The results showed that the total number of grammatical cohesion used by the learners was 2386, while 175 of them performed errors. It was also found that there was a heavy reliance on the use of particular cohesive items. The intralingual transfer mostly caused the errors made by learners. This implied a need for writing teachers to apply strategies for the development of EFL learners' writing ability, such as exposing students to exercises, using collaborative learning, giving feedback, and using the learning management system.
印尼外语学习者议论文中的衔接手段
衔接手段是长期以来被公认为优秀写作的重要特征的基本要素。然而,对学习者来说,恰当地使用它们是有问题的。这项描述性定性研究旨在调查印尼英语学习者在写作中使用衔接手段的能力。印尼东爪哇马朗一所州立大学的20名英语学习者被要求写一篇由五段组成的议论文并发送给学生进行分析。通过识别语法衔接的正确和错误数量,对20篇论文进行了分析。然后对这些错误进行评估,以了解导致学习者错误的可能原因。结果表明,学习者使用的语法衔接总数为2386个,其中175个出现了错误。研究还发现,人们严重依赖于使用特定的衔接项目。语内迁移是造成学习者错误的主要原因。这意味着写作教师需要应用策略来发展英语学习者的写作能力,例如让学生接触练习、使用合作学习、提供反馈和使用学习管理系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信