Hemostatic Agents in Orthodontics: a review

Majid Samaei Rahni, Arian Hesam Arefi
{"title":"Hemostatic Agents in Orthodontics: a review","authors":"Majid Samaei Rahni, Arian Hesam Arefi","doi":"10.18502/jcr.v8i3.8835","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction and aims: Loss of the bracket‒tooth bond is one of the most common complaints of patients during orthodontic treatment. Various factors play a role in preventing the loss of such a strong bond between the bracket and tooth, one of which is the maintenance of proper isolation and prevention of contamination of tooth surface with blood during the surgical exposure of the impacted tooth. In case of bleeding during disimpaction treatment, the use of hemostatic agents might decrease the odds of tooth surface contamination with blood, resulting in a strong bond. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of different hemostatic agents on the bond between the bracket and tooth. \nMaterials and methods: Science Direct, PubMed, and Google Scholar databases were searched for relevant previous studies published from 2010 to 2020. These studies’ titles and abstracts were evaluated for inclusion criteria. In vivo and in vitro studies evaluating the effect of hemostatic agents on the bracket‒tooth bond were included. \nResults: Eight studies were included in the study based on inclusion criteria; five studies were in vitro, and two were in vivo; one study had both designs. Of in vitro studies evaluating the bond strength, five studies reported a higher bond strength in the control group than the group in which the tooth surfaces were contaminated with a hemostatic agent; besides, the bond strength in the hemostatic agent group was higher than that in the group in which the tooth surfaces were contaminated with blood. Of in vivo studies, two studies evaluated bracket failure as a criterion to evaluate bonding quality. In one of these studies, bracket failure in the control groups was more than the hemostatic agent group, and in the other study, it was more prevalent in the hemostatic agent group than the control groups. Studies comparing different hemostatic agents did not report any significant differences in bonding quality. \nConclusion: It appears that the use of hemostatic agents in disimpaction treatments can prevent contamination of tooth surface with blood, increasing the bond strength between the bracket and tooth; however, care should be exercised to prevent tooth surface contamination with hemostatic agents.","PeriodicalId":52622,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Craniomaxillofacial Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Craniomaxillofacial Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/jcr.v8i3.8835","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and aims: Loss of the bracket‒tooth bond is one of the most common complaints of patients during orthodontic treatment. Various factors play a role in preventing the loss of such a strong bond between the bracket and tooth, one of which is the maintenance of proper isolation and prevention of contamination of tooth surface with blood during the surgical exposure of the impacted tooth. In case of bleeding during disimpaction treatment, the use of hemostatic agents might decrease the odds of tooth surface contamination with blood, resulting in a strong bond. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of different hemostatic agents on the bond between the bracket and tooth. Materials and methods: Science Direct, PubMed, and Google Scholar databases were searched for relevant previous studies published from 2010 to 2020. These studies’ titles and abstracts were evaluated for inclusion criteria. In vivo and in vitro studies evaluating the effect of hemostatic agents on the bracket‒tooth bond were included. Results: Eight studies were included in the study based on inclusion criteria; five studies were in vitro, and two were in vivo; one study had both designs. Of in vitro studies evaluating the bond strength, five studies reported a higher bond strength in the control group than the group in which the tooth surfaces were contaminated with a hemostatic agent; besides, the bond strength in the hemostatic agent group was higher than that in the group in which the tooth surfaces were contaminated with blood. Of in vivo studies, two studies evaluated bracket failure as a criterion to evaluate bonding quality. In one of these studies, bracket failure in the control groups was more than the hemostatic agent group, and in the other study, it was more prevalent in the hemostatic agent group than the control groups. Studies comparing different hemostatic agents did not report any significant differences in bonding quality. Conclusion: It appears that the use of hemostatic agents in disimpaction treatments can prevent contamination of tooth surface with blood, increasing the bond strength between the bracket and tooth; however, care should be exercised to prevent tooth surface contamination with hemostatic agents.
口腔正畸止血剂研究进展
引言和目的:托槽-牙齿结合缺失是患者在正畸治疗过程中最常见的抱怨之一。各种因素在防止托槽和牙齿之间失去如此牢固的结合方面发挥着作用,其中之一是在阻生牙的手术暴露过程中保持适当的隔离和防止血液污染牙齿表面。如果在嵌塞治疗过程中出血,使用止血剂可能会降低牙齿表面被血液污染的几率,从而形成牢固的结合。本研究旨在评估不同止血剂对托槽与牙齿结合的影响。材料和方法:检索Science Direct、PubMed和Google Scholar数据库中2010年至2020年发表的相关先前研究。对这些研究的标题和摘要进行了纳入标准评估。包括评估止血剂对托槽-牙齿结合效果的体内和体外研究。结果:根据纳入标准,本研究共纳入8项研究;五项研究是在体外进行的,两项是在体内进行的;一项研究有两种设计。在评估结合强度的体外研究中,有五项研究报告称,对照组的结合强度高于牙齿表面被止血剂污染的组;此外,止血剂组的结合强度高于牙齿表面被血液污染的组。在体内研究中,有两项研究将支架失效作为评估粘接质量的标准。在其中一项研究中,对照组的支架失效比止血剂组多,在另一项研究,止血剂组的支架衰竭比对照组更普遍。比较不同止血剂的研究没有报告粘合质量的任何显著差异。结论:应用止血剂进行牙嵌顿治疗,可防止血液污染牙齿表面,提高托槽与牙齿的结合强度;然而,应注意防止止血剂污染牙齿表面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信