MATERNITY LEAVE AND DISCRIMINATION AGAINST FATHERS: CURRENT CASE LAW OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION AND THE WAY FORWARD

Q4 Social Sciences
M. Rodríguez
{"title":"MATERNITY LEAVE AND DISCRIMINATION AGAINST FATHERS: CURRENT CASE LAW OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION AND THE WAY FORWARD","authors":"M. Rodríguez","doi":"10.13165/J.ICJ.2018.06.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) questions whether traditional women’s rights, such as breastfeeding leave and maternity leave, are in line with the principle of non-discrimination between parents (the Roca Alvarez and Betriu Montull cases). This case law triggers a fundamental question: Is maternity leave going beyond biological differences between the sexes and therefore perpetuating the traditional role of women as child carers? The aim of this article is to gain insight into the compatibility of maternity leave with the principle of equal treatment between the delivering mother and the father. On the one hand, it reviews and analyses in depth the case law of the CJEU, which has consistently held since 1984 that maternity leave is a legitimate exception to the principle of equal treatment between men and women and that Member States are not obliged to confer on fathers a similar period of leave. On the other hand, it reflects on a way forward to find a better balance between the recognition of women’s biological specificities and the rights of all parents to spend time with their children.","PeriodicalId":32140,"journal":{"name":"International Comparative Jurisprudence","volume":"4 1","pages":"27-41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Comparative Jurisprudence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13165/J.ICJ.2018.06.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Recent case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) questions whether traditional women’s rights, such as breastfeeding leave and maternity leave, are in line with the principle of non-discrimination between parents (the Roca Alvarez and Betriu Montull cases). This case law triggers a fundamental question: Is maternity leave going beyond biological differences between the sexes and therefore perpetuating the traditional role of women as child carers? The aim of this article is to gain insight into the compatibility of maternity leave with the principle of equal treatment between the delivering mother and the father. On the one hand, it reviews and analyses in depth the case law of the CJEU, which has consistently held since 1984 that maternity leave is a legitimate exception to the principle of equal treatment between men and women and that Member States are not obliged to confer on fathers a similar period of leave. On the other hand, it reflects on a way forward to find a better balance between the recognition of women’s biological specificities and the rights of all parents to spend time with their children.
产假与对父亲的歧视:欧盟法院的现行判例法及其发展方向
欧洲联盟法院最近的判例法质疑传统妇女的权利,如哺乳假和产假,是否符合父母之间不歧视的原则(Roca Alvarez和Betriu Montull案)。这一判例法引发了一个根本问题:产假是否超越了性别之间的生理差异,从而延续了妇女作为儿童保育员的传统角色?本文的目的是深入了解产假与分娩母亲和父亲平等待遇原则的兼容性。一方面,它深入审查和分析了欧盟法院的判例法,该判例法自1984年以来一直认为产假是男女平等待遇原则的合法例外,成员国没有义务给予父亲类似的假期。另一方面,它反映了在承认妇女的生理特性和所有父母花时间陪伴子女的权利之间找到更好平衡的前进道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信