Sympathy for the Devil? Exploring Flexicurity Win–Win Promises

IF 0.9 Q3 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR
P. Pedraza, M. Álvarez‐Díaz, M. Domínguez-Torreiro
{"title":"Sympathy for the Devil? Exploring Flexicurity Win–Win Promises","authors":"P. Pedraza, M. Álvarez‐Díaz, M. Domínguez-Torreiro","doi":"10.2478/izajolp-2019-0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Flexicurity is the combination of more flexibility for employers and more security for workers. It is a complex and multifaceted phenomenon that lacks a well-developed monitoring framework or a statistically consistent grouping of the indicators. First, this paper proposes a conceptual framework by building upon the Wilthagen and Tros (2004) flexicurity matrix and the Danish Golden Triangle. It constructs flexicurity “drivers” by pooling together variables that are conceptually related to each other and a specific type of flexibility or security. Then, it obtains statistically consistent aggregate measures for each driver and selects three drivers that represent the three corners of the Danish “golden triangle”: external numerical flexibility, employment security, and income security. It conducts an empirical analysis on the evolution of the selected flexicurity drivers over time and across European Union (EU) countries and on the relationship between selected flexicurity drivers and social outcomes from the Social Scoreboard of the European Pillar of Social Rights. It finds evidence of convergence on external numerical flexibility and polarization on employment and income security across the EU. It finds that higher flexibility at the onset of the crisis contributed to a reduction in the unemployment rates after the crisis, while a more generous welfare system contributed to reducing poverty. Employment security, however, appears to be linked to the presence of higher levels of income inequality after the crisis.","PeriodicalId":45367,"journal":{"name":"IZA Journal of Labor Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IZA Journal of Labor Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/izajolp-2019-0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Abstract Flexicurity is the combination of more flexibility for employers and more security for workers. It is a complex and multifaceted phenomenon that lacks a well-developed monitoring framework or a statistically consistent grouping of the indicators. First, this paper proposes a conceptual framework by building upon the Wilthagen and Tros (2004) flexicurity matrix and the Danish Golden Triangle. It constructs flexicurity “drivers” by pooling together variables that are conceptually related to each other and a specific type of flexibility or security. Then, it obtains statistically consistent aggregate measures for each driver and selects three drivers that represent the three corners of the Danish “golden triangle”: external numerical flexibility, employment security, and income security. It conducts an empirical analysis on the evolution of the selected flexicurity drivers over time and across European Union (EU) countries and on the relationship between selected flexicurity drivers and social outcomes from the Social Scoreboard of the European Pillar of Social Rights. It finds evidence of convergence on external numerical flexibility and polarization on employment and income security across the EU. It finds that higher flexibility at the onset of the crisis contributed to a reduction in the unemployment rates after the crisis, while a more generous welfare system contributed to reducing poverty. Employment security, however, appears to be linked to the presence of higher levels of income inequality after the crisis.
同情魔鬼?探索灵活双赢承诺
摘要灵活性是雇主更大的灵活性和工人更安全的结合。这是一个复杂和多方面的现象,缺乏完善的监测框架或统计上一致的指标分组。首先,本文在Wilthagen和Tros(2004)的弹性安全矩阵和丹麦金三角的基础上提出了一个概念框架。它通过将概念上相互关联的变量和特定类型的灵活性或安全性汇集在一起,构建了灵活性安全性“驱动因素”。然后,它为每个驱动因素获得了统计上一致的总指标,并选择了代表丹麦“金三角”三个角的三个驱动因素:外部数字灵活性、就业保障和收入保障。它对选定的灵活保障驱动因素随着时间的推移和欧洲联盟(欧盟)各国的演变进行了实证分析,并对选定的灵活性保障驱动因素与欧洲社会权利支柱社会记分牌中的社会成果之间的关系进行了实证分析。它发现了外部数字灵活性趋同以及整个欧盟就业和收入保障两极分化的证据。研究发现,危机开始时更高的灵活性有助于降低危机后的失业率,而更慷慨的福利制度有助于减少贫困。然而,就业保障似乎与危机后收入不平等程度加剧有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IZA Journal of Labor Policy
IZA Journal of Labor Policy INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: The IZA Journal of Labor Policy publishes scientific articles that are relevant for policy-making. This refers to papers addressing the impact of institutional settings and policy interventions on labor market outcomes, both from a theoretical as well as from an empirical point of view. In addition, the IZA Journal of Labor Policy publishes literature reviews and meta-analyses that synthesize existing research on policy relevant issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信