Less Invasive Surfactant Administration (LISA) in Premature Neonates, using 5F feeding tube versus 2 mm Endotracheal tube – An Innovative, Pilot study

Q4 Medicine
K. Konda, Swapna Lingaldinna, Sadiqua Anjum, M. Alimelu, Himabindu Singh, Apoorva Tadury
{"title":"Less Invasive Surfactant Administration (LISA) in Premature Neonates, using 5F feeding tube versus 2 mm Endotracheal tube – An Innovative, Pilot study","authors":"K. Konda, Swapna Lingaldinna, Sadiqua Anjum, M. Alimelu, Himabindu Singh, Apoorva Tadury","doi":"10.3126/jnps.v42i2.40619","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Administration of LISA using thin and soft catheters like 5 F orogastric tube, though less invasive, is technically challenging and needs expertise. We hypothesized, use of a 2 mm Endotracheal (ET) tube for administration of LISA could be an easy and convenient alternative.\n Methods: This is a prospective, single-centric, quasi-random, pilot trial conducted in the inborn unit of a tertiary care hospital from May 2020 - December 2020. All the inborn preterm (28 - 34 weeks) neonates with respiratory distress requiring surfactant were alternately allocated to receive LISA using a 5 F infant feeding tube or an uncuffed 2.0 size ET tube. The primary outcome was successful administration of surfactant defined as a procedure without any need for positive pressure ventilation.\nResults: In our study, 25 neonates were enrolled in each arm. Administration of LISA using 2 mm ET tube was associated with better success of surfactant administration with lesser incidence of PPV (20 vs 11, p < 0.05), desaturation (5 vs 12, p < 0.05), and bradycardia (3 vs 10, p < 0.05) compared to LISAOG.\nConclusions: Administration of LISA using a 2 mm ET is an easily adaptable and convenient alternative that is well tolerated by the neonates without any adverse effects.","PeriodicalId":39140,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nepal Paediatric Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nepal Paediatric Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/jnps.v42i2.40619","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Administration of LISA using thin and soft catheters like 5 F orogastric tube, though less invasive, is technically challenging and needs expertise. We hypothesized, use of a 2 mm Endotracheal (ET) tube for administration of LISA could be an easy and convenient alternative. Methods: This is a prospective, single-centric, quasi-random, pilot trial conducted in the inborn unit of a tertiary care hospital from May 2020 - December 2020. All the inborn preterm (28 - 34 weeks) neonates with respiratory distress requiring surfactant were alternately allocated to receive LISA using a 5 F infant feeding tube or an uncuffed 2.0 size ET tube. The primary outcome was successful administration of surfactant defined as a procedure without any need for positive pressure ventilation. Results: In our study, 25 neonates were enrolled in each arm. Administration of LISA using 2 mm ET tube was associated with better success of surfactant administration with lesser incidence of PPV (20 vs 11, p < 0.05), desaturation (5 vs 12, p < 0.05), and bradycardia (3 vs 10, p < 0.05) compared to LISAOG. Conclusions: Administration of LISA using a 2 mm ET is an easily adaptable and convenient alternative that is well tolerated by the neonates without any adverse effects.
早产新生儿使用5F饲管与2mm气管插管的微创表面活性剂给药(LISA)——一项创新的试点研究
简介:使用薄而软的导管(如5 F胃导管)进行LISA给药,虽然侵入性较小,但在技术上具有挑战性,需要专业知识。我们假设,使用2毫米的气管插管(ET)给药LISA可能是一种简单方便的替代方法。方法:这是一项前瞻性、单中心、准随机的试点试验,于2020年5月至2020年12月在一家三级护理医院的先天性病房进行。所有患有呼吸窘迫需要表面活性物质的先天性早产(28-34周)新生儿被交替分配使用5F婴儿喂养管或2.0尺寸的未切割ET管接受LISA。主要结果是成功地给予表面活性剂,这是一种不需要任何正压通气的程序。结果:在我们的研究中,每只手臂有25名新生儿入选。使用2mm ET管施用LISA与表面活性剂施用的更好成功相关,PPV(20 vs 11,p<0.05)、去饱和(5 vs 12,p<0.01)、,和心动过缓(3比10,p<0.05)。结论:使用2mm ET给药LISA是一种易于适应和方便的替代方案,新生儿耐受性良好,没有任何不良反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Nepal Paediatric Society
Journal of Nepal Paediatric Society Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信