Some Observations concerning the Communication Competence in Romanian

Pub Date : 2021-07-01 DOI:10.2478/saec-2021-0006
I. Cretu
{"title":"Some Observations concerning the Communication Competence in Romanian","authors":"I. Cretu","doi":"10.2478/saec-2021-0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In the Romanian language, there are differences in the assessment of prepositions based on the linguistic knowledge. For the analyzed structures of the Romanian language, the article uses the competence theory of Coseriu (1980, 1988). In his theory there are three forms of judgment used as criteria to distinguish between the different types of knowledge: the first type refers to the general language competence, the ability of the speaker to speak congruently, the second type refers to the ability to use a single language correctly and the third rated the ability to speak appropriately corresponding to the matter, to the listeners and to the situation. The structures like: pahar de apă / pahar cu apă (water glass/ glass (with) water) are for many linguists - including Coseriu – a very confusing example of language use. Since the reasons for that (and the solutions) have not been so clearly presented in the research as in the case of the regional varieties, the aim of the article is to present more precisely - based on Coseriu’s competence theory - the nature of the deviations in the use of language and the circumstances under which mistakes are accepted.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/saec-2021-0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract In the Romanian language, there are differences in the assessment of prepositions based on the linguistic knowledge. For the analyzed structures of the Romanian language, the article uses the competence theory of Coseriu (1980, 1988). In his theory there are three forms of judgment used as criteria to distinguish between the different types of knowledge: the first type refers to the general language competence, the ability of the speaker to speak congruently, the second type refers to the ability to use a single language correctly and the third rated the ability to speak appropriately corresponding to the matter, to the listeners and to the situation. The structures like: pahar de apă / pahar cu apă (water glass/ glass (with) water) are for many linguists - including Coseriu – a very confusing example of language use. Since the reasons for that (and the solutions) have not been so clearly presented in the research as in the case of the regional varieties, the aim of the article is to present more precisely - based on Coseriu’s competence theory - the nature of the deviations in the use of language and the circumstances under which mistakes are accepted.
分享
查看原文
关于罗马尼亚语交际能力的几点看法
摘要在罗马尼亚语中,根据语言学知识对介词的评价存在差异。对于罗马尼亚语的结构分析,本文采用了Coseriu(19801988)的能力理论。在他的理论中,有三种形式的判断被用作区分不同类型知识的标准:第一类是指一般语言能力,即说话者说话连贯的能力,第二类是指正确使用单一语言的能力,听众和情况。像pahar de apă/pahar cu apă(水玻璃/水玻璃)这样的结构对许多语言学家来说都是一个非常令人困惑的语言使用例子,包括Coseriu。由于研究中没有像区域变体那样清楚地说明原因(以及解决方案),因此本文的目的是基于Coseriu的能力理论,更准确地说明语言使用偏差的性质以及接受错误的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信