The two-dimensional orthography of phonology and morphology in differentiating Korean and Chinese

Q1 Arts and Humanities
J. Jeong, L. Katz, Yang Lee
{"title":"The two-dimensional orthography of phonology and morphology in differentiating Korean and Chinese","authors":"J. Jeong, L. Katz, Yang Lee","doi":"10.1080/17586801.2018.1519482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The differences of writing systems are reflected in the processing of the languages in question. Word recognition constrained by writing systems has been attended by various theories. By analysing the recognition processes of Korean and Chinese words in this study, two of theories, the orthographic depth hypothesis (ODH) and the two-dimensional orthography of phonology and morphology (OPM) were compared. The ODH predicted that word recognition in the case of transparent orthography between sound and spelling is processed by grapheme-phoneme decoding to show the phonological effect in a lexical task. Since the OPM posits two independent dimensions of phonology and morphology, it can explain the morphological effect which is independent of the phonological effect and which is disregarded by the ODH. Testing morphological intrusion in a pronunciation-matching task, this study confirmed that the larger effect on Chinese in Experiment 2 compared with Korean in Experiment 1 supported the OPM. However, further discussion suggests that the ODH is not rejected, but regarded to be subordinate to the OPM. The former was posited only on one dimension of phonological orthography, and the latter both on phonology and on morphology.","PeriodicalId":39225,"journal":{"name":"Writing Systems Research","volume":"10 1","pages":"73 - 81"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17586801.2018.1519482","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Writing Systems Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2018.1519482","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT The differences of writing systems are reflected in the processing of the languages in question. Word recognition constrained by writing systems has been attended by various theories. By analysing the recognition processes of Korean and Chinese words in this study, two of theories, the orthographic depth hypothesis (ODH) and the two-dimensional orthography of phonology and morphology (OPM) were compared. The ODH predicted that word recognition in the case of transparent orthography between sound and spelling is processed by grapheme-phoneme decoding to show the phonological effect in a lexical task. Since the OPM posits two independent dimensions of phonology and morphology, it can explain the morphological effect which is independent of the phonological effect and which is disregarded by the ODH. Testing morphological intrusion in a pronunciation-matching task, this study confirmed that the larger effect on Chinese in Experiment 2 compared with Korean in Experiment 1 supported the OPM. However, further discussion suggests that the ODH is not rejected, but regarded to be subordinate to the OPM. The former was posited only on one dimension of phonological orthography, and the latter both on phonology and on morphology.
朝鲜语与汉语语音形态的二维正写法
写作系统的差异反映在所讨论的语言的处理过程中。受书写系统约束的单词识别一直受到各种理论的关注。通过分析朝鲜语和汉语单词的识别过程,比较了两种理论,即正字法深度假设(ODH)和二维音韵学和形态学正字法(OPM)。ODH预测,在声音和拼写之间的透明正写法的情况下,单词识别是通过字形-音素解码来处理的,以显示词汇任务中的语音效果。由于OPM提出了音韵学和形态学两个独立的维度,它可以解释独立于音韵学效应而被ODH忽视的形态学效应。通过在发音匹配任务中测试形态入侵,本研究证实,与实验1中的韩语相比,实验2中对汉语的影响更大,这支持了OPM。然而,进一步的讨论表明,ODH并没有被拒绝,而是被视为隶属于OPM。前者仅在语音正写法的一个维度上提出,而后者在音韵学和形态学上都提出。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Writing Systems Research
Writing Systems Research Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信