Strategic Realism, not Optimism: Bayesian and Indigenous Perspectives on the Democratizing Petition

IF 0.5 3区历史学 Q1 HISTORY

Social Science History Pub Date : 2022-11-10 DOI:10.1017/ssh.2022.37

D. Carpenter

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Let us face it. Some folks out there are always going to think of us as damaged, and not because they are so convinced of the devastating aftereffects of colonization. But it is crucial to recognize that our communities hold the power to begin shifting the discourse away from damage and toward desire and complexity. We can insist that research in our communities, whether participatory or not, does not fetishize damage but, rather, celebrates our survivance.

查看原文本刊更多论文

战略现实主义，而非乐观主义：民主化请愿的贝叶斯和本土视角

让我们面对现实吧。有些人总是认为我们受到了伤害，而不是因为他们太相信殖民的毁灭性后果。但至关重要的是要认识到，我们的社区掌握着开始将话语从损害转向欲望和复杂性的权力。我们可以坚持认为，在我们的社区中进行的研究，无论是否参与，都不会恋物癖地破坏，而是庆祝我们的生存。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Social Science History Multiple-

CiteScore

1.50

自引率

12.50%

发文量

期刊介绍： Social Science History seeks to advance the study of the past by publishing research that appeals to the journal"s interdisciplinary readership of historians, sociologists, economists, political scientists, anthropologists, and geographers. The journal invites articles that blend empirical research with theoretical work, undertake comparisons across time and space, or contribute to the development of quantitative and qualitative methods of analysis. Online access to the current issue and all back issues of Social Science History is available to print subscribers through a combination of HighWire Press, Project Muse, and JSTOR via a single user name or password that can be accessed from any location (regardless of institutional affiliation).