Degrowth, anti-capitalism or post-archaeology? A response to Nicolas Zorzin

IF 1.4 1区历史学 0 ARCHAEOLOGY

Archaeological Dialogues Pub Date : 2021-06-01 DOI:10.1017/S1380203821000052

LouAnn Wurst

引用次数: 0

Abstract

1 When employed by Oxford Archaeological Unit (now Oxford Archaeology) on the Swindon–Gloucester road scheme (1996) we were required to sign a disclaimer against road protests. This was after the Newbury bypass and M3 Winchester protests where archaeologists had been active dissenting voices. Now we found ourselves working for the road builders, who did not consider this dichotomy to be appropriate. 2 See https://blacktrowelcollective.wordpress.com. 3 See www.mola.org.uk/archaeology-and-public-benefit-ukri-future-leaders-fellowship.

查看原文本刊更多论文

堕落、反资本主义还是后考古学？对Nicolas Zorzin的回应

1当我们受雇于牛津考古单位（现为牛津考古）执行斯文顿-格洛斯特道路计划（1996年）时，我们被要求签署一份反对道路抗议的免责声明。这是在纽伯里绕道和M3温彻斯特抗议活动之后，考古学家一直在积极反对。现在我们发现自己在为道路建设者工作，他们认为这种二分法不合适。2参见https://blacktrowelcollective.wordpress.com.3参见www.mola.org.uk/archaeology-and-public-benefit-ukri-future-leaders-formulty。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Archaeological Dialogues ARCHAEOLOGY-

CiteScore

3.70

自引率

5.60%

发文量

期刊介绍： Archaeology is undergoing rapid changes in terms of its conceptual framework and its place in contemporary society. In this challenging intellectual climate, Archaeological Dialogues has become one of the leading journals for debating innovative issues in archaeology. Firmly rooted in European archaeology, it now serves the international academic community for discussing the theories and practices of archaeology today. True to its name, debate takes a central place in Archaeological Dialogues.