Increasing rates of clinic no-shows during and following the COVID-19 pandemic at an academic orthopaedic multispecialty group

IF 0.2 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
Aaron K. Hoyt, Ryan C. LeDuc, H. Castillo, John R. Miller
{"title":"Increasing rates of clinic no-shows during and following the COVID-19 pandemic at an academic orthopaedic multispecialty group","authors":"Aaron K. Hoyt, Ryan C. LeDuc, H. Castillo, John R. Miller","doi":"10.1097/bco.0000000000001234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Clinic no-shows are common throughout all medical specialties and can be used as a potential surrogate marker for access to care and have a significant impact on patients and providers. While anecdotally, orthopaedic surgeons have noticed unprecedented changes in the delivery of care as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, the effect on no-show rates has not been quantified.\n \n \n \n An analysis of the rates of outpatient clinic no-shows within a multispecialty, academic orthopaedic surgery practice was completed. Encounters were sub-classified into designated periods based on a “pre-COVID-19” period, a “COVID-19” period, and a “post-COVID-19” period. A univariate analysis was performed to comment on differences amongst insurance payer status. A multivariate regression was completed to assess which variables contributed to no-show rates among this orthopaedic practice.\n \n \n \n The overall no-show rate over the course of the study was 8.5%. These rates differed significantly between insurance groups, with the lowest no-show rate among Workers’ Compensation/Liability Insurance (WC/LI; 6.4%) and the highest among uninsured patients (21.4%). Additionally, no-show rates differed significantly by COVID period (pre-COVID=7.3%, COVID=8.6%, P<.0001). These rates further increased in the post-COVID period (9.6%, P<.0001) In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, medical practice habits have altered out of necessity.\n \n \n \n Despite a relaxation of social distancing guidelines, no-show rates have continued to increase at our institution. Our results suggest a disproportionate effect on those of lower socioeconomic status. The specific needs of the patient population should be considered when implementing strategies to improve clinic attendance.\n","PeriodicalId":10732,"journal":{"name":"Current Orthopaedic Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Orthopaedic Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/bco.0000000000001234","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Clinic no-shows are common throughout all medical specialties and can be used as a potential surrogate marker for access to care and have a significant impact on patients and providers. While anecdotally, orthopaedic surgeons have noticed unprecedented changes in the delivery of care as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, the effect on no-show rates has not been quantified. An analysis of the rates of outpatient clinic no-shows within a multispecialty, academic orthopaedic surgery practice was completed. Encounters were sub-classified into designated periods based on a “pre-COVID-19” period, a “COVID-19” period, and a “post-COVID-19” period. A univariate analysis was performed to comment on differences amongst insurance payer status. A multivariate regression was completed to assess which variables contributed to no-show rates among this orthopaedic practice. The overall no-show rate over the course of the study was 8.5%. These rates differed significantly between insurance groups, with the lowest no-show rate among Workers’ Compensation/Liability Insurance (WC/LI; 6.4%) and the highest among uninsured patients (21.4%). Additionally, no-show rates differed significantly by COVID period (pre-COVID=7.3%, COVID=8.6%, P<.0001). These rates further increased in the post-COVID period (9.6%, P<.0001) In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, medical practice habits have altered out of necessity. Despite a relaxation of social distancing guidelines, no-show rates have continued to increase at our institution. Our results suggest a disproportionate effect on those of lower socioeconomic status. The specific needs of the patient population should be considered when implementing strategies to improve clinic attendance.
在新冠肺炎大流行期间和之后,一个学术整形外科多专科小组的临床不合格率增加
诊所无症状在所有医疗专业中都很常见,可以作为获得护理的潜在替代标志,并对患者和提供者产生重大影响。尽管有传闻称,整形外科医生注意到,由于新冠肺炎大流行,在提供护理方面发生了前所未有的变化,但对无手术率的影响尚未量化。完成了对多专业、学术整形外科实践中门诊未就诊率的分析。根据“新冠肺炎前”时期、“新冠肺炎后”时期,将接触分为指定时期。进行了单变量分析,以评论保险支付人身份之间的差异。完成了一项多变量回归,以评估哪些变量导致了这种整形外科实践中的无显示率。在研究过程中,总体未参保率为8.5%。这些比率在保险组之间存在显著差异,其中工伤赔偿/责任保险(WC/LI)中的未参保率最低,为6.4%,未参保患者中的最高(21.4%)。此外,新冠肺炎期间的无症状发生率差异显著(新冠肺炎前=7.3%,新冠肺炎=8.6%,P<.0001)。这些发生率在新冠肺炎后进一步增加(9.6%,P<.0001)为了应对新冠肺炎大流行,医疗实践习惯已无需改变。尽管社交距离准则有所放宽,但我们机构的不露面率仍在继续上升。我们的研究结果表明,对那些社会经济地位较低的人产生了不成比例的影响。在实施提高就诊率的策略时,应考虑患者群体的具体需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins is a leading international publisher of professional health information for physicians, nurses, specialized clinicians and students. For a complete listing of titles currently published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and detailed information about print, online, and other offerings, please visit the LWW Online Store. Current Orthopaedic Practice is a peer-reviewed, general orthopaedic journal that translates clinical research into best practices for diagnosing, treating, and managing musculoskeletal disorders. The journal publishes original articles in the form of clinical research, invited special focus reviews and general reviews, as well as original articles on innovations in practice, case reports, point/counterpoint, and diagnostic imaging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信