EZRA POUND AND A. H. TANPINAR: TWO MODES OF AUTHENTICITY IN MODERNIST WORLD LITERATURE

Serhat Uyurkulak
{"title":"EZRA POUND AND A. H. TANPINAR: TWO MODES OF AUTHENTICITY IN MODERNIST WORLD LITERATURE","authors":"Serhat Uyurkulak","doi":"10.16953/deusosbil.1178011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study is based on the premise that modernist literature, presented as an essentially Western current in the established narratives of literary history, is global in nature, and that there are works all around the world that fall within its scope. This premise rests on the fact that the condition called modernity itself is a global phenomenon. Not only colonialism and imperialism, but also the projects of modernization and Westernization witnessed in different geographies made modernity extend over the entire globe. This article argues that the formal and technical novelties distinguishing modernist literature from what preceded it intend to represent and respond to new subjective and social experiences caused by modernity. In this context, Ezra Pound’s poem “In a Station of the Metro” and Ahmet Hamdi Tanpınar’s novel A Mind at Peace (Huzur) are examined, and their formal and technical aspects are discussed with regard to a common experience of modernity. This experience bearing different forms and contents in different places is identified as fragmentation, loss of the sense of totality, alienation, and the ensuing desire for authenticity. It is demonstrated that the notion of the image in Pound’s poem and the method of dream aesthetics in Tanpınar’s novel are two literary inventions addressing that common experience of fragmentation and the quest for authenticity. This study also identifies the distinct traits of the two modes of authenticity imagined by Pound and Tanpınar.","PeriodicalId":30201,"journal":{"name":"Dokuz Eylul Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitusu Dergisi","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dokuz Eylul Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitusu Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16953/deusosbil.1178011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study is based on the premise that modernist literature, presented as an essentially Western current in the established narratives of literary history, is global in nature, and that there are works all around the world that fall within its scope. This premise rests on the fact that the condition called modernity itself is a global phenomenon. Not only colonialism and imperialism, but also the projects of modernization and Westernization witnessed in different geographies made modernity extend over the entire globe. This article argues that the formal and technical novelties distinguishing modernist literature from what preceded it intend to represent and respond to new subjective and social experiences caused by modernity. In this context, Ezra Pound’s poem “In a Station of the Metro” and Ahmet Hamdi Tanpınar’s novel A Mind at Peace (Huzur) are examined, and their formal and technical aspects are discussed with regard to a common experience of modernity. This experience bearing different forms and contents in different places is identified as fragmentation, loss of the sense of totality, alienation, and the ensuing desire for authenticity. It is demonstrated that the notion of the image in Pound’s poem and the method of dream aesthetics in Tanpınar’s novel are two literary inventions addressing that common experience of fragmentation and the quest for authenticity. This study also identifies the distinct traits of the two modes of authenticity imagined by Pound and Tanpınar.
庞德与坦皮纳:现代主义世界文学的两种真实性模式
本研究的前提是,现代主义文学在文学史的既定叙事中本质上是一股西方潮流,具有全球性,世界各地都有属于其范围的作品。这一前提建立在这样一个事实上,即被称为现代性的条件本身就是一种全球现象。不仅是殖民主义和帝国主义,而且在不同地区所见证的现代化和洋务工程使现代性遍及全球。本文认为,现代主义文学区别于其之前的文学的形式和技术上的新颖性,意在代表和回应现代性带来的新的主观和社会体验。在这种背景下,埃兹拉·庞德的诗歌《在地铁的一个车站里》和艾哈迈德·哈姆迪·坦普纳尔的小说《心灵的和平》(Huzur)被考察,并就现代性的共同体验讨论了它们的形式和技术方面。这种在不同地方具有不同形式和内容的体验被认定为碎片化、整体感的丧失、异化以及随之而来的对真实性的渴望。研究表明,庞德诗歌中的意象概念和坦普纳尔小说中的梦美学方法是两项文学发明,它们解决了碎片化的共同体验和对真实性的追求。本研究还确定了Pound和Tanpınar想象的两种真实性模式的不同特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
61
审稿时长
26 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信