Rushing to the end: Participants’ perceptions of demotivating aspects of online surveys

Q3 Social Sciences
João Martins, Leonor Lavradio
{"title":"Rushing to the end: Participants’ perceptions of demotivating aspects of online surveys","authors":"João Martins, Leonor Lavradio","doi":"10.14417/ap.1674","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"More and more social science studies are now acquiring data through the internet, reaching participantsonline. Some participants start out engaged and motivated to participate, but progressively slide into“rushing behaviors”. We inquired experts in survey responding about when, in online studies, theywould feel a desire for rushing (defined as speeding with no concerns about the quality of responses).This qualitative approach uncovered Repetition, Survey length and No interest in topic as the threemain features that would motivate these participants to rush in surveys. Subsequent inquiry of thesame participants indicated that repetition concerns the type of questions made (more than stimuli ortask), the execution of the same task more than 5-6 times, or for more than 6 minutes. Survey lengthconcerns a preference for shorter surveys, as well as the subjective experience in which length exceedspreviously set expectations (i.e., longer than announced), contributing to rushing by effectivelylowering the hourly pay rate as the survey increases in length. Interest in topic was reported to beconsistently low, despite not being the main reason to quit the survey. However, a change in expectedlevel of interest in the middle of the survey is reported as a factor that will promote rushing behaviors.We discuss these data as informative regarding how pre-tests of surveys can benefit from theseparticipants’ expertise.","PeriodicalId":38440,"journal":{"name":"Analise Psicologica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analise Psicologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14417/ap.1674","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

More and more social science studies are now acquiring data through the internet, reaching participantsonline. Some participants start out engaged and motivated to participate, but progressively slide into“rushing behaviors”. We inquired experts in survey responding about when, in online studies, theywould feel a desire for rushing (defined as speeding with no concerns about the quality of responses).This qualitative approach uncovered Repetition, Survey length and No interest in topic as the threemain features that would motivate these participants to rush in surveys. Subsequent inquiry of thesame participants indicated that repetition concerns the type of questions made (more than stimuli ortask), the execution of the same task more than 5-6 times, or for more than 6 minutes. Survey lengthconcerns a preference for shorter surveys, as well as the subjective experience in which length exceedspreviously set expectations (i.e., longer than announced), contributing to rushing by effectivelylowering the hourly pay rate as the survey increases in length. Interest in topic was reported to beconsistently low, despite not being the main reason to quit the survey. However, a change in expectedlevel of interest in the middle of the survey is reported as a factor that will promote rushing behaviors.We discuss these data as informative regarding how pre-tests of surveys can benefit from theseparticipants’ expertise.
冲向终点:参与者对在线调查中令人沮丧的方面的看法
越来越多的社会科学研究正在通过互联网获取数据,并在网上接触参与者。一些参与者一开始很投入,有动力参与,但逐渐陷入“匆忙行为”。我们询问了调查中的专家,在在线研究中,他们什么时候会有冲刺的欲望(定义为在不考虑回复质量的情况下超速行驶)。这种定性方法揭示了重复、调查长度和对主题不感兴趣是促使这些参与者匆忙进行调查的三个主要特征。随后对同一参与者的调查表明,重复涉及问题的类型(而不是刺激或任务),执行同一任务超过5-6次,或超过6分钟。调查长度涉及对较短调查的偏好,以及长度超过先前设定的预期(即,比宣布的更长)的主观体验,随着调查长度的增加,有效降低时薪率,从而导致匆忙。据报道,尽管这并不是退出调查的主要原因,但人们对这个话题的兴趣却一直很低。然而,据报道,在调查中期,预期兴趣水平的变化是促进冲动行为的一个因素。我们讨论这些数据,以了解调查的预测试如何从参与者的专业知识中受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Analise Psicologica
Analise Psicologica Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信