The place where only gays go: constructions of queer space in the narratives of sexually diverse refugees

IF 1.8 Q3 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM
Alex Powell
{"title":"The place where only gays go: constructions of queer space in the narratives of sexually diverse refugees","authors":"Alex Powell","doi":"10.1108/jpmd-11-2022-0108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this paper is to develop an understanding of how gay and lesbian spaces are constructed and deployed within the context of asylum claims by sexually diverse people. Through doing this, the author details the ways in which the present deployment of place, as a form of evidence for a relatively fixed conception of sexual difference, does not correspond to the self-conceptions of sexually diverse asylum seekers.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis article draws on the experiences of eight sexually diverse refugees who agreed to participate in semi-structured interviews. Deploying a queer narrative analysis approach, these experiences are explored to develop a detailed understanding of how sexually diverse spaces are constructed within refugee status determinations. This interview-led approach is combined with a critical epistemology informed by the queer theory to understand the role of place in the construction of sexual identity.\n\n\nFindings\nThe central finding of this article is that engagement/attendance with/in particular places and spaces is overdetermined as a form of evidence of LGBTIQA+ identity within refugee status determination. Further findings relate to the relationship between places and sexual identities more generally. The paper helps to shed light on how sexually diverse identities are conceived in essentially ontological and fixed terms, with the result that places are often flattened, with the diversity and tensions within them being ignored and occluded.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe originality of this study emerges from the analysis of new qualitative data. This originality is strengthened by the successful combination of empirical research, queer theoretical insights and the application of this combination to policy. This remaining a relatively rare combination. In addition, in contrast to the existing literature, the paper looks specifically at how LGBTIQA+ or queer spaces are conceptualised within refugee status determination processes.\n","PeriodicalId":46966,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Place Management and Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Place Management and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jpmd-11-2022-0108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to develop an understanding of how gay and lesbian spaces are constructed and deployed within the context of asylum claims by sexually diverse people. Through doing this, the author details the ways in which the present deployment of place, as a form of evidence for a relatively fixed conception of sexual difference, does not correspond to the self-conceptions of sexually diverse asylum seekers. Design/methodology/approach This article draws on the experiences of eight sexually diverse refugees who agreed to participate in semi-structured interviews. Deploying a queer narrative analysis approach, these experiences are explored to develop a detailed understanding of how sexually diverse spaces are constructed within refugee status determinations. This interview-led approach is combined with a critical epistemology informed by the queer theory to understand the role of place in the construction of sexual identity. Findings The central finding of this article is that engagement/attendance with/in particular places and spaces is overdetermined as a form of evidence of LGBTIQA+ identity within refugee status determination. Further findings relate to the relationship between places and sexual identities more generally. The paper helps to shed light on how sexually diverse identities are conceived in essentially ontological and fixed terms, with the result that places are often flattened, with the diversity and tensions within them being ignored and occluded. Originality/value The originality of this study emerges from the analysis of new qualitative data. This originality is strengthened by the successful combination of empirical research, queer theoretical insights and the application of this combination to policy. This remaining a relatively rare combination. In addition, in contrast to the existing literature, the paper looks specifically at how LGBTIQA+ or queer spaces are conceptualised within refugee status determination processes.
只有同性恋者才去的地方:性取向不同的难民叙事中的酷儿空间建构
目的本文的目的是了解男女同性恋空间是如何在不同性别的人申请庇护的背景下构建和部署的。通过这样做,作者详细说明了目前作为相对固定的性别差异概念的证据形式的地点部署与性别多样化的寻求庇护者的自我概念不一致的方式。设计/方法/方法本文借鉴了八名性取向不同的难民的经历,他们同意参加半结构化访谈。运用酷儿叙事分析方法,探索这些经历,以详细了解在难民身份确定中如何构建性多样性空间。这种以访谈为主导的方法与酷儿理论为基础的批判性认识论相结合,以理解场所在性身份建构中的作用。发现这篇文章的核心发现是,在难民身份确定中,与特定地点和空间的接触/参与被过度确定为LGBTIQA+身份的一种证据。进一步的研究结果更普遍地涉及地点和性身份之间的关系。这篇论文有助于揭示性多样性身份是如何从本质上用本体论和固定的术语来构思的,结果是地方往往被扁平化,其中的多样性和紧张关系被忽视和封闭。独创性/价值这项研究的独创性来自于对新的定性数据的分析。实证研究、酷儿理论见解的成功结合以及这种结合在政策中的应用加强了这种独创性。这仍然是一个相对罕见的组合。此外,与现有文献相比,本文专门研究了LGBTIQA+或酷儿空间是如何在难民身份确定过程中被概念化的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Place Management and Development
Journal of Place Management and Development HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
16
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信