Automated segmentation of cardiac adipose tissue in Dixon magnetic resonance images

J. Klingensmith, Addison L. Elliott, María Fernandez-Del-Valle, S. Mitra
{"title":"Automated segmentation of cardiac adipose tissue in Dixon magnetic resonance images","authors":"J. Klingensmith, Addison L. Elliott, María Fernandez-Del-Valle, S. Mitra","doi":"10.5430/JBGC.V8N1P1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Increasing evidence suggests a strong link between excess cardiac adipose tissue (CAT) and the risk of a cardiovascular event. Multi-echo Dixon magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), providing fat-only and water-only images, is a useful tool for quantification but requires the segmentation of CAT from a large number of images. The intent of this study was to evaluate an automated technique for CAT segmentation from Dixon MRI by comparing the contours identified by the automated algorithm to those manually traced by an observer.  Methods: An automated segmentation algorithm, based on optimal thresholds and custom morphological processing, was applied to the registered fat-only and water-only images to identify CAT in the volume scans. CAT contours in 446 images, from 10 MRI scans, were selected for validation analysis. Cross-sectional area (CSA) and volume were computed and compared using Bland-Altman analysis. In addition, Hausdorff distance and Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) were used for assessment. Results: Linear regression analysis yielded correlation of R 2 = 0.381 for CSA and R 2 = 0.879 for volume. When compared to the observer, the computer algorithm under-estimated CSA by 27.5 ± 40.0% and volume by 26.4 ± 10.4%. The average bidirectional Hausdorff distance was 26.2 ± 16.0 mm while the average unidirectional Hausdorff distances were 24.5 ± 15.7 mm and 12.4 ± 11.7 mm. The average DSC was 0.561 ± 0.100. The time required for manual tracing was 15.84 ± 3.73 min and the time required for the computer algorithm was 2.81 ± 0.12 min. Conclusions: This study provided a technique, faster and less tedious than manual tracing ( p < 0.00001), for quantification of CAT in Dixon MRI data, demonstrating feasibility of this approach for cardiac risk stratification.","PeriodicalId":89580,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomedical graphics and computing","volume":"8 1","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5430/JBGC.V8N1P1","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomedical graphics and computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5430/JBGC.V8N1P1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Objective: Increasing evidence suggests a strong link between excess cardiac adipose tissue (CAT) and the risk of a cardiovascular event. Multi-echo Dixon magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), providing fat-only and water-only images, is a useful tool for quantification but requires the segmentation of CAT from a large number of images. The intent of this study was to evaluate an automated technique for CAT segmentation from Dixon MRI by comparing the contours identified by the automated algorithm to those manually traced by an observer.  Methods: An automated segmentation algorithm, based on optimal thresholds and custom morphological processing, was applied to the registered fat-only and water-only images to identify CAT in the volume scans. CAT contours in 446 images, from 10 MRI scans, were selected for validation analysis. Cross-sectional area (CSA) and volume were computed and compared using Bland-Altman analysis. In addition, Hausdorff distance and Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) were used for assessment. Results: Linear regression analysis yielded correlation of R 2 = 0.381 for CSA and R 2 = 0.879 for volume. When compared to the observer, the computer algorithm under-estimated CSA by 27.5 ± 40.0% and volume by 26.4 ± 10.4%. The average bidirectional Hausdorff distance was 26.2 ± 16.0 mm while the average unidirectional Hausdorff distances were 24.5 ± 15.7 mm and 12.4 ± 11.7 mm. The average DSC was 0.561 ± 0.100. The time required for manual tracing was 15.84 ± 3.73 min and the time required for the computer algorithm was 2.81 ± 0.12 min. Conclusions: This study provided a technique, faster and less tedious than manual tracing ( p < 0.00001), for quantification of CAT in Dixon MRI data, demonstrating feasibility of this approach for cardiac risk stratification.
Dixon磁共振图像中心脏脂肪组织的自动分割
目的:越来越多的证据表明,过量的心脏脂肪组织(CAT)与心血管事件的风险之间有着密切的联系。多回波Dixon磁共振成像(MRI)提供仅脂肪和仅水的图像,是一种有用的量化工具,但需要从大量图像中分割CAT。本研究的目的是通过将自动算法识别的轮廓与观察者手动追踪的轮廓进行比较,评估Dixon MRI CAT分割的自动技术。方法:将基于最优阈值和自定义形态学处理的自动分割算法应用于配准的纯脂肪和纯水图像,以识别体积扫描中的CAT。从10次MRI扫描中选择446张图像中的CAT轮廓进行验证分析。使用Bland-Altman分析计算并比较横截面积(CSA)和体积。此外,还使用Hausdorff距离和Dice相似系数(DSC)进行了评估。结果:线性回归分析得出CSA的R2=0.381,体积的R2=0.879。与观察者相比,计算机算法低估了27.5±40.0%的CSA和26.4±10.4%的体积。平均双向豪斯多夫距离为26.2±16.0mm,平均单向豪斯多夫距离分别为24.5±15.7mm和12.4±11.7mm。平均DSC为0.561±0.100。手动追踪所需的时间为15.84±3.73分钟,计算机算法所需时间为2.81±0.12分钟。结论:本研究为Dixon MRI数据中CAT的量化提供了一种比手动追踪更快、不那么繁琐的技术(p<0.00001),证明了该方法用于心脏风险分层的可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信