Legal Atlantic Forest (Mata Atlântica Legal): integrating biogeography to public policies towards the conservation of the biodiversity hotspot

Q4 Social Sciences
A. Cunha, C. B. M. Cruz, G. Fonseca
{"title":"Legal Atlantic Forest (Mata Atlântica Legal): integrating biogeography to public policies towards the conservation of the biodiversity hotspot","authors":"A. Cunha, C. B. M. Cruz, G. Fonseca","doi":"10.18472/sustdeb.v10n3.2019.27112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Atlantic Forest (AF) is one of the most biodiverse and threatened biomes on the planet, but the existence of two official boundaries (AF Biome and Domain – AF Law) causes uncertainties, with consequences for public policies and the conservation of remnants. In order to understand the biogeography and its influence for protection of the AF, the areas of the two boundaries and the overlap with states and ecoregions they occupy were compared. Our results, supported by the literature, indicate that the Legal boundary is broader and more representative of AF’s current and evolutionary heterogeneity and diversity, and provides a more adequate legal basis for its conservation and sustainable use, especially in the northeast region, where the biggest difference between both limits were encountered.  Thus, the term Legal Atlantic Forest should be increasingly used, in order to reinforce the full application of laws governing the protection and sustainable use of the biome.","PeriodicalId":37646,"journal":{"name":"Sustentabilidade em Debate","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustentabilidade em Debate","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18472/sustdeb.v10n3.2019.27112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Atlantic Forest (AF) is one of the most biodiverse and threatened biomes on the planet, but the existence of two official boundaries (AF Biome and Domain – AF Law) causes uncertainties, with consequences for public policies and the conservation of remnants. In order to understand the biogeography and its influence for protection of the AF, the areas of the two boundaries and the overlap with states and ecoregions they occupy were compared. Our results, supported by the literature, indicate that the Legal boundary is broader and more representative of AF’s current and evolutionary heterogeneity and diversity, and provides a more adequate legal basis for its conservation and sustainable use, especially in the northeast region, where the biggest difference between both limits were encountered.  Thus, the term Legal Atlantic Forest should be increasingly used, in order to reinforce the full application of laws governing the protection and sustainable use of the biome.
合法大西洋森林(Mata atlntica Legal):将生物地理学与保护生物多样性热点的公共政策相结合
大西洋森林(AF)是地球上生物多样性和受威胁程度最高的生物群落之一,但两个官方边界(AF生物群落和领域——AF法)的存在造成了不确定性,并对公共政策和残余物的保护产生了影响。为了了解生物地理学及其对AF保护的影响,对两个边界的面积及其与它们所占据的州和生态区的重叠进行了比较。我们的研究结果得到了文献的支持,表明法律边界更宽,更能代表AF当前和进化的异质性和多样性,并为其保护和可持续利用提供了更充分的法律基础,尤其是在东北地区,这两个边界之间的差异最大。因此,应越来越多地使用“合法大西洋森林”一词,以加强有关生物群落保护和可持续利用的法律的充分适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sustentabilidade em Debate
Sustentabilidade em Debate Social Sciences-Development
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Publish original texts, based on interdisciplinary research, with the potential for achieving strong impact on research agendas in the fields of sustainable development and environmental policies, as well as on the promotion of sustainability, in different scales.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信