{"title":"When corporate culture matters: The case of stakeholder violations","authors":"Rashid Zaman","doi":"10.1016/j.bar.2023.101188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study examines whether and how a strong corporate culture influences stakeholder violations. Using a longitudinal sample of monetary penalties imposed on US-listed firms for stakeholder violations, I find evidence that a strong corporate culture is significantly and negatively associated with such violations. This outcome remains robust to a series of robustness and endogeneity tests, including the application of the generalized method of moments (GMM), entropy balancing, and propensity score matching (PSM) estimation. The channel analysis evidence implies that information asymmetry is a possible mechanism through which a strong corporate culture is associated with stakeholder violations. A cross-sectional analysis demonstrates that the documented association between strong corporate culture and stakeholder violations is stronger for companies with weak external monitoring. Additionally, the negative association between strong corporate culture and stakeholder violations varies across violation types and cultural dimensions. This study contributes to the ongoing discourse on the role of informal corporate governance mechanisms (corporate culture) in mitigating corporate stakeholder violations. Finally, it has important implications for stakeholders, including policymakers, regulators, and practitioners, intending to promote responsible business practices.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47996,"journal":{"name":"British Accounting Review","volume":"56 1","pages":"Article 101188"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890838923000185/pdfft?md5=003c4c2936a55ccbf5fd57984df338ad&pid=1-s2.0-S0890838923000185-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Accounting Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890838923000185","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study examines whether and how a strong corporate culture influences stakeholder violations. Using a longitudinal sample of monetary penalties imposed on US-listed firms for stakeholder violations, I find evidence that a strong corporate culture is significantly and negatively associated with such violations. This outcome remains robust to a series of robustness and endogeneity tests, including the application of the generalized method of moments (GMM), entropy balancing, and propensity score matching (PSM) estimation. The channel analysis evidence implies that information asymmetry is a possible mechanism through which a strong corporate culture is associated with stakeholder violations. A cross-sectional analysis demonstrates that the documented association between strong corporate culture and stakeholder violations is stronger for companies with weak external monitoring. Additionally, the negative association between strong corporate culture and stakeholder violations varies across violation types and cultural dimensions. This study contributes to the ongoing discourse on the role of informal corporate governance mechanisms (corporate culture) in mitigating corporate stakeholder violations. Finally, it has important implications for stakeholders, including policymakers, regulators, and practitioners, intending to promote responsible business practices.
期刊介绍:
The British Accounting Review*is pleased to publish original scholarly papers across the whole spectrum of accounting and finance. The journal is eclectic and pluralistic and contributions are welcomed across a wide range of research methodologies (e.g. analytical, archival, experimental, survey and qualitative case methods) and topics (e.g. financial accounting, management accounting, finance and financial management, auditing, public sector accounting, social and environmental accounting; accounting education and accounting history), evidence from UK and non-UK sources are equally acceptable.