Evaluation of Adverse Effects due to Inactive COVID-19 Vaccination in Healthcare Workers with or without a History of COVID-19

IF 0.3 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Gamze Kalin-Unuvar, Zeynep Ture-Yuce, Nadir Kahveci, Orhan Yıldız, B. Aygen
{"title":"Evaluation of Adverse Effects due to Inactive COVID-19 Vaccination in Healthcare Workers with or without a History of COVID-19","authors":"Gamze Kalin-Unuvar, Zeynep Ture-Yuce, Nadir Kahveci, Orhan Yıldız, B. Aygen","doi":"10.36519/kd.2023.3829","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Vaccines are one of the promising approaches to control the pandemic. The aim of this study, which was conducted on healthcare workers who previously were or were not infected with COVID-19, was to evaluate the undesirable effects that developed after the CoronaVac (Sinovac Life Sciences, Beijing, China).\n\nMethods: Volunteers who were administered the first dose of inactivated CoronaVac vaccine between January 14-24, 2021, were included in this retrospective study. Demographic information was obtained from the questionnaire results and from the data of the applications made due to side effects.\n\nResults: 911 healthcare workers, 232 of whom had a history of COVID-19 were included in the study. The mean age of those with a history of COVID-19, was 36 (20-66), and 33.6% were men. 26.7% were doctors, 34.9% were nurses, 155 (66.8%) worked in internal and 62 (26.7%) in surgical units. There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding age, gender, task, and the departments they worked in. Comorbidities were present in 25.9% of the group with a history of COVID-19; the most common disease was asthma (5.6%). Allergy history was 4.3% in the group with COVID-19 and 7.8% in the other group (p=0.070). The incidence of post-vaccine adverse events (62.9%) was higher in those with a history of COVID-19 than in those without (57.1%). The most common adverse event was a headache, and it was significantly higher in the group who had COVID-19 compared to those who had not (36.6% vs. 27.7%; p=0.01).\n\nConclusion: In our study, we observed that the rates of undesirable effects after vaccination were high in individuals with a history of COVID-19. Although it is thought that this situation may be related to the developing antibody response rates, the insufficient number of cases and the lack of determination of the antibody response after infection and vaccination are a disadvantage of the study.","PeriodicalId":44309,"journal":{"name":"Klimik Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Klimik Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36519/kd.2023.3829","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Vaccines are one of the promising approaches to control the pandemic. The aim of this study, which was conducted on healthcare workers who previously were or were not infected with COVID-19, was to evaluate the undesirable effects that developed after the CoronaVac (Sinovac Life Sciences, Beijing, China). Methods: Volunteers who were administered the first dose of inactivated CoronaVac vaccine between January 14-24, 2021, were included in this retrospective study. Demographic information was obtained from the questionnaire results and from the data of the applications made due to side effects. Results: 911 healthcare workers, 232 of whom had a history of COVID-19 were included in the study. The mean age of those with a history of COVID-19, was 36 (20-66), and 33.6% were men. 26.7% were doctors, 34.9% were nurses, 155 (66.8%) worked in internal and 62 (26.7%) in surgical units. There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding age, gender, task, and the departments they worked in. Comorbidities were present in 25.9% of the group with a history of COVID-19; the most common disease was asthma (5.6%). Allergy history was 4.3% in the group with COVID-19 and 7.8% in the other group (p=0.070). The incidence of post-vaccine adverse events (62.9%) was higher in those with a history of COVID-19 than in those without (57.1%). The most common adverse event was a headache, and it was significantly higher in the group who had COVID-19 compared to those who had not (36.6% vs. 27.7%; p=0.01). Conclusion: In our study, we observed that the rates of undesirable effects after vaccination were high in individuals with a history of COVID-19. Although it is thought that this situation may be related to the developing antibody response rates, the insufficient number of cases and the lack of determination of the antibody response after infection and vaccination are a disadvantage of the study.
有或无COVID-19病史的医护人员非活性COVID-19疫苗接种的不良反应评估
目的:疫苗是控制疫情的一种有前景的方法。这项研究针对之前感染或未感染新冠肺炎的医护人员进行,目的是评估CoronaVac(科兴生命科学,中国北京)后产生的不良影响。方法:在2021年1月14日至24日期间接种第一剂灭活CoronaVac疫苗的志愿者被纳入这项回顾性研究。人口统计信息是从问卷调查结果和因副作用而提出的申请的数据中获得的。结果:911名医护人员被纳入研究,其中232人有新冠肺炎病史。有新冠肺炎病史的人的平均年龄为36岁(20-66岁),33.6%为男性。26.7%是医生,34.9%是护士,155人(66.8%)在内科工作,62人(26.7%)在外科工作。在年龄、性别、任务和工作部门方面,两组之间没有显著差异。有新冠肺炎病史的组中有25.9%患有合并症;最常见的疾病是哮喘(5.6%)。新冠肺炎组的过敏史为4.3%,另一组为7.8%(p=0.070)。有新冠肺炎史者的疫苗接种后不良事件发生率(62.9%)高于无新冠肺炎史者(57.1%)。最常见的不良事件是头痛,新冠肺炎患者的不良反应发生率显著高于未感染者(36.6%对27.7%;p=0.01)。结论:在我们的研究中,我们观察到有新冠肺炎病史的患者接种疫苗后不良反应的发生率很高。尽管人们认为这种情况可能与抗体反应率的发展有关,但病例数量不足以及缺乏对感染和接种疫苗后抗体反应的确定是该研究的一个缺点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Klimik Journal
Klimik Journal MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
33.30%
发文量
39
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信