Not Out of the Woods Yet: On the Trail of the Commodity Frontier in Fuelwood for Iron

Q1 Social Sciences
J. Watson
{"title":"Not Out of the Woods Yet: On the Trail of the Commodity Frontier in Fuelwood for Iron","authors":"J. Watson","doi":"10.1080/10455752.2021.1917638","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Since the 1930s some economic historians have supposed that there was “timber famine” in early modern England, due to over-use of wood fuel for industry, especially making iron with charcoal, and the narrative is still current, often combined with a claim that England was deforested in that way. For the environmental historian Jason W. Moore in particular, the idea of a commodity frontier in “forest products” is central to an account of the spread of capitalism. After a brief summary of woodland management in Britain, I discuss how calculations have been made, with many estimates and approximations, in relation to deforestation in the Weald, where the manufacture of iron in blast furnaces first came to Britain. Although the case for timber famine and deforestation due to charcoal iron cannot be demonstrated through the calculation approach, the industry certainly had socioeconomic and environmental impacts, and I suggest ways forward researching these within a unified approach to economic and environmental history. The idea of a single commodity frontier in “forest products” cannot be sustained but the commodity frontier concept remains useful in investigating the commodification process.","PeriodicalId":39549,"journal":{"name":"Capitalism, Nature, Socialism","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10455752.2021.1917638","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Capitalism, Nature, Socialism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10455752.2021.1917638","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Since the 1930s some economic historians have supposed that there was “timber famine” in early modern England, due to over-use of wood fuel for industry, especially making iron with charcoal, and the narrative is still current, often combined with a claim that England was deforested in that way. For the environmental historian Jason W. Moore in particular, the idea of a commodity frontier in “forest products” is central to an account of the spread of capitalism. After a brief summary of woodland management in Britain, I discuss how calculations have been made, with many estimates and approximations, in relation to deforestation in the Weald, where the manufacture of iron in blast furnaces first came to Britain. Although the case for timber famine and deforestation due to charcoal iron cannot be demonstrated through the calculation approach, the industry certainly had socioeconomic and environmental impacts, and I suggest ways forward researching these within a unified approach to economic and environmental history. The idea of a single commodity frontier in “forest products” cannot be sustained but the commodity frontier concept remains useful in investigating the commodification process.
《尚未走出困境:在炼铁的柴火中探索商品边疆》
摘要自20世纪30年代以来,一些经济历史学家一直认为,由于工业过度使用木材燃料,尤其是木炭炼铁,现代早期的英格兰出现了“木材饥荒”,这种说法至今仍在流传,经常与英格兰被砍伐的说法相结合。特别是对环境历史学家杰森·W·摩尔来说,“森林产品”中的商品前沿概念是资本主义传播的核心。在简要总结了英国的林地管理后,我讨论了如何对威尔德的森林砍伐进行计算,以及许多估计和近似值,威尔德是英国最早在高炉中生产铁的地方。尽管无法通过计算方法证明木炭铁导致的木材饥荒和森林砍伐的情况,但该行业肯定会产生社会经济和环境影响,我建议在经济和环境史的统一方法中研究这些问题。“森林产品”中单一商品边界的概念是不可持续的,但商品边界概念在研究商品化过程中仍然有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Capitalism, Nature, Socialism
Capitalism, Nature, Socialism Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: CNS is a journal of ecosocialism. We welcome submissions on red-green politics and the anti-globalization movement; environmental history; workplace labor struggles; land/community struggles; political economy of ecology; and other themes in political ecology. CNS especially wants to join (relate) discourses on labor, feminist, and environmental movements, and theories of political ecology and radical democracy. Works on ecology and socialism are particularly welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信