Evaluating Patient Profile, Follow-Up Rates and Barriers to Follow-Up at a Student-Run, Community-Based Tuberculosis Testing Program

Sophia M. Foroushani, Andrew Crawford, Alexandra Woodbridge, Dan Frechtling, J. Ali
{"title":"Evaluating Patient Profile, Follow-Up Rates and Barriers to Follow-Up at a Student-Run, Community-Based Tuberculosis Testing Program","authors":"Sophia M. Foroushani, Andrew Crawford, Alexandra Woodbridge, Dan Frechtling, J. Ali","doi":"10.59586/jsrc.v8i1.263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The Tulane Student-Run Tuberculosis (TB) Program provides TB risk evaluation, skin testing (TST), and referrals at six homeless shelters and rehabilitation facilities. To date, there has been no evaluation of the program’s patient profile. The objective of this study was to determine the symp-toms and risk factors for TB present in the program's clients, calculate follow-up rates for TST reading, and determine factors associated with an increased rate of missing reading appointments.  \nMethods: This retrospective chart review examines the prevalence of risk factors and TB symptoms, evaluates risk stratification, and determines barriers to follow-up for TST over a 33-month period. Rel-ative risks (RR) were calculated to determine the association between risk stratification, positive TST, and loss to follow-up. Z-values were calculated, and p-values were determined as the area of the dis-tribution outside of +/- z. P-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.  \nResults: Of 6,198 individuals seen, 479 were referred to higher care, 238 received 30-day clearances, 34 deferred testing, and four were sent to the hospital. Of 5,443 TSTs placed, 4,155 were read and 214 were positive. Individuals who had any risk factors were at significantly increased risk of not attending TST reading (RR 2.14, 95% Confidence interval [CI] 1.96-2.34, p<0.01) and, for those who did attend, of having a positive TST (RR 1.52, 95% CI 1.17-1.98, p<0.01). Higher risk of no-show and positive TST was also seen in homeless individuals (RR 3.44, 95% CI 2.92-4.07, p<0.01 and RR 2.10, 95% CI 1.52-2.90, p<0.01, re-spectively) and those with intermediate-risk stratification (RR 1.25, 95% CI 1.11-1.41, p<0.01 and RR 1.32, 95% CI 1.01-1.72, p=0.04, respectively).  \nConclusions: Individuals experiencing homelessness and those with intermittent TB risk stratification are at increased risk for positive TST. Both homelessness and the presence of any TB risk factors in-crease the risk of loss to follow-up. ","PeriodicalId":73958,"journal":{"name":"Journal of student-run clinics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of student-run clinics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59586/jsrc.v8i1.263","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Tulane Student-Run Tuberculosis (TB) Program provides TB risk evaluation, skin testing (TST), and referrals at six homeless shelters and rehabilitation facilities. To date, there has been no evaluation of the program’s patient profile. The objective of this study was to determine the symp-toms and risk factors for TB present in the program's clients, calculate follow-up rates for TST reading, and determine factors associated with an increased rate of missing reading appointments.  Methods: This retrospective chart review examines the prevalence of risk factors and TB symptoms, evaluates risk stratification, and determines barriers to follow-up for TST over a 33-month period. Rel-ative risks (RR) were calculated to determine the association between risk stratification, positive TST, and loss to follow-up. Z-values were calculated, and p-values were determined as the area of the dis-tribution outside of +/- z. P-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.  Results: Of 6,198 individuals seen, 479 were referred to higher care, 238 received 30-day clearances, 34 deferred testing, and four were sent to the hospital. Of 5,443 TSTs placed, 4,155 were read and 214 were positive. Individuals who had any risk factors were at significantly increased risk of not attending TST reading (RR 2.14, 95% Confidence interval [CI] 1.96-2.34, p<0.01) and, for those who did attend, of having a positive TST (RR 1.52, 95% CI 1.17-1.98, p<0.01). Higher risk of no-show and positive TST was also seen in homeless individuals (RR 3.44, 95% CI 2.92-4.07, p<0.01 and RR 2.10, 95% CI 1.52-2.90, p<0.01, re-spectively) and those with intermediate-risk stratification (RR 1.25, 95% CI 1.11-1.41, p<0.01 and RR 1.32, 95% CI 1.01-1.72, p=0.04, respectively).  Conclusions: Individuals experiencing homelessness and those with intermittent TB risk stratification are at increased risk for positive TST. Both homelessness and the presence of any TB risk factors in-crease the risk of loss to follow-up. 
评估患者概况,随访率和随访障碍在学生运行,以社区为基础的结核病检测项目
背景:杜兰学生经营的结核病项目在六个无家可归者收容所和康复机构提供结核病风险评估、皮肤检测和转诊服务。到目前为止,还没有对该计划进行评估™的患者档案。本研究的目的是确定该项目客户中存在的结核病症状和风险因素,计算TST阅读的随访率,并确定与错过阅读预约率增加相关的因素。方法:这项回顾性图表综述检查了危险因素和结核病症状的患病率,评估了风险分层,并确定了33个月内TST随访的障碍。计算相关风险(RR),以确定风险分层、阳性TST和随访损失之间的相关性。计算Z值,并将p值确定为+/-Z之外的分布面积。p值<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。结果:在6198名患者中,479人接受了更高级别的护理,238人接受了30天的检查,34人推迟了检测,4人被送往医院。在放置的5443个TST中,4155个被读取,214个呈阳性。有任何风险因素的个体不参加TST阅读的风险显著增加(RR 2.14,95%置信区间[CI]1.96-2.34,p<0.01),对于那些参加的个体,TST阳性的风险(RR 1.52,95%CI 1.17-1.98,p<0.01)。无家可归者(分别为RR 3.44,95%CI 2.92-4.07,p<0.01和RR 2.10,95%CI 1.52-2.90,p<0.01)和具有中等风险分层的人(分别为RR1.25,95%CI 1.11-1.41,p<0.01和RR1.32,95%CI 1.01-1.72,p=0.04)也有较高的TST未出现和阳性风险。结论:无家可归者和间歇性结核病风险分层者TST阳性的风险增加。无家可归和任何结核病风险因素的存在都会增加失去随访的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信