Evaluación de la percepción de los participantes de un programa de entrenamiento con simulación in situ en un centro de paciente crítico adulto

IF 0.2 Q4 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Andrés Ferre , Martin Benites , Nicolette Van Sint Jan , Natalia Hernandez , Andrea Peña , M. Idalia Sepulveda , Andrés Reccius , Pablo Hasbún , Jorge Dreyse , Tomás Regueira
{"title":"Evaluación de la percepción de los participantes de un programa de entrenamiento con simulación in situ en un centro de paciente crítico adulto","authors":"Andrés Ferre ,&nbsp;Martin Benites ,&nbsp;Nicolette Van Sint Jan ,&nbsp;Natalia Hernandez ,&nbsp;Andrea Peña ,&nbsp;M. Idalia Sepulveda ,&nbsp;Andrés Reccius ,&nbsp;Pablo Hasbún ,&nbsp;Jorge Dreyse ,&nbsp;Tomás Regueira","doi":"10.1016/j.rmclc.2023.03.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Clinical simulation is an effective strategy to improve patient safety. In Situ simulation may accrue benefits by utilizing the intensive care facility, routine clinical supplies and equipment, as well as being performed during the workday.</p><p>The objective of this study was to evaluate participants’ perception of a high-fidelity in situ simulation program in an adult critical patient center.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A semi-structured anonymous survey was applied after the debriefing of the in situ simulation that evaluated the reaction of the health personnel of the adult critical patient unit of Clinica Las Condes.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 144 surveys were obtained during 25 simulation sessions. Most of the variables evaluated had a score above 9, interpreted as excellent or very relevant, except for the question “After this activity, do you feel more confident of your skills in a similar real case scenario?”, which presented a score of 8.65<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->1.5. When analyzing the variables according to the role of the professional, there were only differences between nurses and nursing technicians. There were no differences between intensive care and intermediate care teams in any of the variables.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The participants’ perceptions with regards to in situ simulation as a training process were interpreted as effective, generating a high degree of satisfaction.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":31544,"journal":{"name":"Revista Medica Clinica Las Condes","volume":"34 3","pages":"Pages 204-209"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Medica Clinica Las Condes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0716864023000391","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Clinical simulation is an effective strategy to improve patient safety. In Situ simulation may accrue benefits by utilizing the intensive care facility, routine clinical supplies and equipment, as well as being performed during the workday.

The objective of this study was to evaluate participants’ perception of a high-fidelity in situ simulation program in an adult critical patient center.

Methods

A semi-structured anonymous survey was applied after the debriefing of the in situ simulation that evaluated the reaction of the health personnel of the adult critical patient unit of Clinica Las Condes.

Results

A total of 144 surveys were obtained during 25 simulation sessions. Most of the variables evaluated had a score above 9, interpreted as excellent or very relevant, except for the question “After this activity, do you feel more confident of your skills in a similar real case scenario?”, which presented a score of 8.65 ± 1.5. When analyzing the variables according to the role of the professional, there were only differences between nurses and nursing technicians. There were no differences between intensive care and intermediate care teams in any of the variables.

Conclusions

The participants’ perceptions with regards to in situ simulation as a training process were interpreted as effective, generating a high degree of satisfaction.

在成人危重病人中心进行现场模拟训练计划的参与者的感知评估
临床模拟是提高患者安全的有效策略。现场模拟可以通过利用重症监护设施、常规临床用品和设备以及在工作日进行而获得益处。本研究的目的是评估参与者对成人危重病人中心的高保真原位模拟程序的感知。方法采用半结构化匿名调查法,在现场模拟情况汇报后,对康德斯医院成人重症病房医护人员的反应进行评价。结果在25次模拟会议中,共获得144份调查。大多数被评估的变量得分都在9分以上,被认为是优秀或非常相关,除了“在这个活动之后,在类似的真实场景中,你对自己的技能更有信心吗?”,得分为8.65±1.5。按专业人员角色进行变量分析时,只有护士和护理技术人员之间存在差异。重症监护和中级护理团队在任何变量上都没有差异。结论:参与者对现场模拟作为培训过程的感知被解释为有效的,产生了高度的满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revista Medica Clinica Las Condes
Revista Medica Clinica Las Condes MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
65
审稿时长
81 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信