Komparasi Model Pembelajaran Sejarah di Kelas IPA dan IPS SMA Angkasa Adisutjipto

Ebma Yudhasatria, A. Sudrajat
{"title":"Komparasi Model Pembelajaran Sejarah di Kelas IPA dan IPS SMA Angkasa Adisutjipto","authors":"Ebma Yudhasatria, A. Sudrajat","doi":"10.52431/murobbi.v2i2.141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Revitalization of history learning for senior high schools in the 2013 Curriculum implemented in science and social classes could affect the use of learning models. Learning models had elements as learning approaches, strategies, methods, and media that had to be correctly customized and implemented. It encouraged the researcher to conduct research on comparison of history learning models in science and social classes in SMA Angkasa Indonesia. This research aimed to analyze similarities and differences between learning models used in science classes and that used in social classes under the “Indonesian History” subject study implemented in SMA Angkasa Adisutjipto Indonesia. This research was descriptive-qualitative research done by comparing history learning models and performed through interviews and observations in science and social classes. Research subjects consisted of the head of curriculum division, history teachers, and students from both science and social classes. Data were collected in forms of information from informants, field observations, and facts on documents gathered. Research findings indicated that history learning in science classes of SMA Angkasa was dominated by the use of linguistic (writing), logical-mathematical, and interpersonal (independent) intelligences. Suitable learning models for science students were problem-based learning, independent learning, exercises, tasking, causal-relationship reasoning regarding history materials, and contextual learning in history. Meanwhile, intelligence found in social classes of SMA Angkasa was dominated by linguistic, interpersonal, spatial (visual, imagination), and kinetic intelligences. Hence, suitable learning models for social students should have been in forms of cooperative learning (discussions, questions-answers); active, creative, effective, and fun learning; role-playing; and contextual and thematic learning","PeriodicalId":32643,"journal":{"name":"Murobbi Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Murobbi Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52431/murobbi.v2i2.141","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Revitalization of history learning for senior high schools in the 2013 Curriculum implemented in science and social classes could affect the use of learning models. Learning models had elements as learning approaches, strategies, methods, and media that had to be correctly customized and implemented. It encouraged the researcher to conduct research on comparison of history learning models in science and social classes in SMA Angkasa Indonesia. This research aimed to analyze similarities and differences between learning models used in science classes and that used in social classes under the “Indonesian History” subject study implemented in SMA Angkasa Adisutjipto Indonesia. This research was descriptive-qualitative research done by comparing history learning models and performed through interviews and observations in science and social classes. Research subjects consisted of the head of curriculum division, history teachers, and students from both science and social classes. Data were collected in forms of information from informants, field observations, and facts on documents gathered. Research findings indicated that history learning in science classes of SMA Angkasa was dominated by the use of linguistic (writing), logical-mathematical, and interpersonal (independent) intelligences. Suitable learning models for science students were problem-based learning, independent learning, exercises, tasking, causal-relationship reasoning regarding history materials, and contextual learning in history. Meanwhile, intelligence found in social classes of SMA Angkasa was dominated by linguistic, interpersonal, spatial (visual, imagination), and kinetic intelligences. Hence, suitable learning models for social students should have been in forms of cooperative learning (discussions, questions-answers); active, creative, effective, and fun learning; role-playing; and contextual and thematic learning
IPA班和IPS高中调整空间的历史学习模式比较
在科学和社会课程中实施的2013年课程中振兴高中历史学习可能会影响学习模式的使用。学习模式包含学习方法、策略、方法和媒体等要素,必须正确定制和实施。它鼓励研究人员对SMA Angkasa Indonesia的科学和社会课程中的历史学习模式进行比较研究。本研究旨在分析在SMA Angkasa Adisutjipto Indonesia实施的“印尼历史”主题研究中,科学课和社会课使用的学习模式之间的异同。这项研究是通过比较历史学习模型进行的描述性定性研究,并通过在科学和社会课堂上的访谈和观察进行。研究对象包括课程部负责人、历史教师以及科学和社会课程的学生。数据是以线人提供的信息、实地观察和收集的文件事实的形式收集的。研究结果表明,SMA Angkasa科学课的历史学习主要由语言(写作)、逻辑数学和人际(独立)智能的使用主导。适合理科学生的学习模式是基于问题的学习、独立学习、练习、任务、关于历史材料的因果关系推理和历史中的情境学习。同时,在SMA Angkasa的社会阶层中发现的智力以语言、人际、空间(视觉、想象)和运动智力为主。因此,适合社会学生的学习模式应该是合作学习(讨论、问答);积极、创造性、有效和有趣的学习;角色扮演;以及上下文和主题学习
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信