Living Well with Dementia - Practitioner Approaches

IF 0.7 Q4 SOCIAL WORK
Annick Richterich
{"title":"Living Well with Dementia - Practitioner Approaches","authors":"Annick Richterich","doi":"10.1080/17496535.2022.2042711","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Recent developments in care for people with mental health conditions of working age have been underpinned by the recovery approach. This paper critically reviews the idea of recovery concerning people with dementia and examines its applicability to living well with dementia. The paper critically reviews the literature relating to the use of the recovery approach for people with dementia, particularly in nursing care. A search was conducted of CINAHL, Cochrane, Science Direct, OVID and Wiley Online databases through the Auckland University of Technology library. The search was confined to the last 10 years of research. Using keywords ‘recovery’, ‘nursing’, ‘dementia’, ‘older adult’, ‘hope’, ‘identity’, ‘connectedness’, ‘empowerment’, ‘CHIME’ and ‘mental health’. The recovery approach shares many ideas with person-centred approaches to dementia care and themes were evaluated using key themes from CHIME, connectedness, hope, identity, meaning and empowerment. The paper concludes by suggesting that care for people with dementia that draws on ideas taken from the recovery approach would improve well-being for people with dementia and the people who care for them and that the CHIME themes are useful for considering care for people with dementia.","PeriodicalId":46151,"journal":{"name":"Ethics and Social Welfare","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethics and Social Welfare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17496535.2022.2042711","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Recent developments in care for people with mental health conditions of working age have been underpinned by the recovery approach. This paper critically reviews the idea of recovery concerning people with dementia and examines its applicability to living well with dementia. The paper critically reviews the literature relating to the use of the recovery approach for people with dementia, particularly in nursing care. A search was conducted of CINAHL, Cochrane, Science Direct, OVID and Wiley Online databases through the Auckland University of Technology library. The search was confined to the last 10 years of research. Using keywords ‘recovery’, ‘nursing’, ‘dementia’, ‘older adult’, ‘hope’, ‘identity’, ‘connectedness’, ‘empowerment’, ‘CHIME’ and ‘mental health’. The recovery approach shares many ideas with person-centred approaches to dementia care and themes were evaluated using key themes from CHIME, connectedness, hope, identity, meaning and empowerment. The paper concludes by suggesting that care for people with dementia that draws on ideas taken from the recovery approach would improve well-being for people with dementia and the people who care for them and that the CHIME themes are useful for considering care for people with dementia.
痴呆症患者的生活方式
摘要康复方法是护理处于工作年龄的精神健康状况患者的最新进展。本文批判性地回顾了痴呆症患者的康复理念,并考察了其在痴呆症患者良好生活中的适用性。本文批判性地回顾了与痴呆症患者康复方法的使用有关的文献,特别是在护理中。通过奥克兰理工大学图书馆对CINAHL、Cochrane、Science Direct、OVID和Wiley Online数据库进行了搜索。搜索仅限于过去10年的研究。使用关键词“康复”、“护理”、“痴呆症”、“老年人”、“希望”、“身份”、“联系”、“赋权”、“CHIME”和“心理健康”。康复方法与以人为中心的痴呆症护理方法有许多相同的想法,并使用CHIME、连通性、希望、身份、意义和赋权等关键主题对主题进行了评估。论文最后指出,借鉴康复方法中的理念对痴呆症患者进行护理将改善痴呆症患者和护理人员的福祉,CHIME主题对考虑痴呆症患者的护理很有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
20.00%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: Ethics and Social Welfare publishes articles of a critical and reflective nature concerned with the ethical issues surrounding social welfare practice and policy. It has a particular focus on social work (including practice with individuals, families and small groups), social care, youth and community work and related professions. The aim of the journal is to encourage dialogue and debate across social, intercultural and international boundaries on the serious ethical issues relating to professional interventions into social life. Through this we hope to contribute towards deepening understandings and further ethical practice in the field of social welfare. The journal welcomes material in a variety of formats, including high quality peer-reviewed academic papers, reflections, debates and commentaries on policy and practice, book reviews and review articles. We actively encourage a diverse range of contributions from academic and field practitioners, voluntary workers, service users, carers and people bringing the perspectives of oppressed groups. Contributions might include reports on research studies on the influence of values and ethics in social welfare practice, education and organisational structures, theoretical papers discussing the evolution of social welfare values and ethics, linked to contemporary philosophical, social and ethical thought, accounts of ethical issues, problems and dilemmas in practice, and reflections on the ethics and values of policy and organisational development. The journal aims for the highest standards in its published material. All material submitted to the journal is subject to a process of assessment and evaluation through the Editors and through peer review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信