Feminizam i psihoterapija: radikalnost ideja naspram ograničenja metode

Q4 Social Sciences
P. Dražić
{"title":"Feminizam i psihoterapija: radikalnost ideja naspram ograničenja metode","authors":"P. Dražić","doi":"10.17234/SOCEKOL.28.1.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper looks at the institution of family from the perspective of dominant theories within the field of psychotherapy: psychoanalysis, existential humanism and cognitive behaviourism. Many psychotherapy schools of thought find the way a nuclear family functions an important and even crucial source of various psychological issues. However, psychotherapy looks for sources of these issues in various dysfunctions without questioning the very institution of family. Psychotherapy therefore implicitly accepts a functionalist position. This approach is opposed by radical and marxist feminism as conflict feminist theories. Radical and marxist feminism are heterogonous approaches but they share a view that one of the key areas of patriarchal oppression and exploitation resides within the institution of family. Therefore, a new perspective developed on the point of convergence between psychotherapy and feminism – feminist psychotherapy – as an approach which applies feminist principles in therapy. In our analysis of this perspective, we conclude that psychotherapy must widen its horizons and analyse social inequalities, which have so far been neglected, while feminism provides important insight into the political perspective of the intimate. However, individualism inherent in psychotherapy, unequal distribution of power within the therapeutic relationship and dominant tendencies in science significantly limit the emancipation power of feminist psychotherapy. Therefore, it seems that psychotherapy, with its goals, methods and immersion in the patriarchal system, pacifies feminist ideas even radical ones.","PeriodicalId":35175,"journal":{"name":"Socijalna Ekologija","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.17234/SOCEKOL.28.1.3","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Socijalna Ekologija","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17234/SOCEKOL.28.1.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper looks at the institution of family from the perspective of dominant theories within the field of psychotherapy: psychoanalysis, existential humanism and cognitive behaviourism. Many psychotherapy schools of thought find the way a nuclear family functions an important and even crucial source of various psychological issues. However, psychotherapy looks for sources of these issues in various dysfunctions without questioning the very institution of family. Psychotherapy therefore implicitly accepts a functionalist position. This approach is opposed by radical and marxist feminism as conflict feminist theories. Radical and marxist feminism are heterogonous approaches but they share a view that one of the key areas of patriarchal oppression and exploitation resides within the institution of family. Therefore, a new perspective developed on the point of convergence between psychotherapy and feminism – feminist psychotherapy – as an approach which applies feminist principles in therapy. In our analysis of this perspective, we conclude that psychotherapy must widen its horizons and analyse social inequalities, which have so far been neglected, while feminism provides important insight into the political perspective of the intimate. However, individualism inherent in psychotherapy, unequal distribution of power within the therapeutic relationship and dominant tendencies in science significantly limit the emancipation power of feminist psychotherapy. Therefore, it seems that psychotherapy, with its goals, methods and immersion in the patriarchal system, pacifies feminist ideas even radical ones.
女权主义与心理治疗:观念的激进与方法的局限
本文从心理治疗领域的主流理论——精神分析、存在主义人本主义和认知行为主义——的角度来看待家庭制度。许多心理治疗学派认为核心家庭的运作方式是各种心理问题的重要甚至关键来源。然而,心理治疗在不质疑家庭制度的情况下,在各种功能障碍中寻找这些问题的根源。因此,心理治疗隐含地接受了功能主义的立场。这种方法遭到激进女权主义和马克思主义女权主义作为冲突女权主义理论的反对。激进女权主义和马克思主义女权主义是两种不同的方法,但他们都认为父权制压迫和剥削的关键领域之一在于家庭制度。因此,在心理治疗和女权主义的交汇点上发展了一种新的视角——女权主义心理治疗——作为一种将女权主义原则应用于治疗的方法。在我们对这一视角的分析中,我们得出结论,心理治疗必须拓宽视野,分析迄今为止被忽视的社会不平等,而女权主义则为亲密者的政治视角提供了重要的见解。然而,心理治疗中固有的个人主义、治疗关系中权力的不平等分配以及科学上的主导倾向,极大地限制了女性主义心理治疗的解放力量。因此,心理治疗似乎以其目标、方法和对父权制的沉浸,安抚了女权主义思想,甚至是激进的女权主义思想。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Socijalna Ekologija
Socijalna Ekologija Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信