The Use of Q Methodology as a Participatory Tool in Natural Resources Management

IF 2.2 3区 社会学 Q2 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
E. Usher, Sarah P. Church, J. Getson, L. Prokopy
{"title":"The Use of Q Methodology as a Participatory Tool in Natural Resources Management","authors":"E. Usher, Sarah P. Church, J. Getson, L. Prokopy","doi":"10.1080/08941920.2023.2191229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Policymakers, practitioners, and governing bodies increasingly recognize the critical role stakeholder engagement plays in successful environmental planning and decision-making. Although stakeholder engagement can improve project outcomes, identifying best practices for stakeholder engagement that apply to diverse topics and settings can be a challenge. Informed by our experience using Q methodology (QM) in five stakeholder meetings in agricultural watershed across the United States, this paper highlights our use of QM as an engagement tool and provides insights for future use. It demonstrates how QM addresses fundamental stakeholder engagement principles and provides guidance on using QM in stakeholder meetings. While we acknowledge inherent QM limitations regarding stakeholder participation and competent facilitators, we used QM to provide a flexible meeting structure that allowed participants to develop opinions and safely engage with peers and decision makers on complex and, at times, controversial topics. HIGHLIGHTS Insights on the use of Q methodology as a meeting facilitation tool Overview of how to use Q methodology for in stakeholder meetings Details how Q methodology can fulfill stakeholder engagement best practices","PeriodicalId":48223,"journal":{"name":"Society & Natural Resources","volume":"36 1","pages":"879 - 890"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Society & Natural Resources","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2023.2191229","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Policymakers, practitioners, and governing bodies increasingly recognize the critical role stakeholder engagement plays in successful environmental planning and decision-making. Although stakeholder engagement can improve project outcomes, identifying best practices for stakeholder engagement that apply to diverse topics and settings can be a challenge. Informed by our experience using Q methodology (QM) in five stakeholder meetings in agricultural watershed across the United States, this paper highlights our use of QM as an engagement tool and provides insights for future use. It demonstrates how QM addresses fundamental stakeholder engagement principles and provides guidance on using QM in stakeholder meetings. While we acknowledge inherent QM limitations regarding stakeholder participation and competent facilitators, we used QM to provide a flexible meeting structure that allowed participants to develop opinions and safely engage with peers and decision makers on complex and, at times, controversial topics. HIGHLIGHTS Insights on the use of Q methodology as a meeting facilitation tool Overview of how to use Q methodology for in stakeholder meetings Details how Q methodology can fulfill stakeholder engagement best practices
Q方法在自然资源管理中作为参与性工具的使用
摘要政策制定者、从业者和管理机构越来越认识到利益相关者参与在成功的环境规划和决策中发挥的关键作用。尽管利益相关者的参与可以改善项目成果,但确定适用于不同主题和环境的利益相关者参与的最佳实践可能是一项挑战。根据我们在美国农业流域的五次利益相关者会议上使用Q方法(QM)的经验,本文强调了我们将QM作为一种参与工具的使用,并为未来的使用提供了见解。它展示了QM如何处理基本的利益相关者参与原则,并提供了在利益相关者会议中使用QM的指导。虽然我们承认质量管理在利益相关者参与和称职的促进者方面存在固有的局限性,但我们使用质量管理提供了一个灵活的会议结构,使参与者能够就复杂且有时有争议的主题发表意见,并安全地与同行和决策者接触。亮点Q方法论作为会议促进工具的使用见解如何在利益相关者会议中使用Q方法论概述详细说明Q方法论如何实现利益相关者参与的最佳实践
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
8.00%
发文量
83
期刊介绍: Society and Natural Resources publishes cutting edge social science research that advances understanding of the interaction between society and natural resources.Social science research is extensive and comes from a number of disciplines, including sociology, psychology, political science, communications, planning, education, and anthropology. We welcome research from all of these disciplines and interdisciplinary social science research that transcends the boundaries of any single social science discipline. We define natural resources broadly to include water, air, wildlife, fisheries, forests, natural lands, urban ecosystems, and intensively managed lands. While we welcome all papers that fit within this broad scope, we especially welcome papers in the following four important and broad areas in the field: 1. Protected area management and governance 2. Stakeholder analysis, consultation and engagement; deliberation processes; governance; conflict resolution; social learning; social impact assessment 3. Theoretical frameworks, epistemological issues, and methodological perspectives 4. Multiscalar character of social implications of natural resource management
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信