The Effectiveness of a Non-Invasive Shot Blocking Device for Reducing Pain of In-office Injections in Hand Surgery.

The Hand Pub Date : 2021-11-01 Epub Date: 2019-11-05 DOI:10.1177/1558944719884655
Brian D Rinker, David A Atashroo, Megan A Stout, F Ryan Wermeling
{"title":"The Effectiveness of a Non-Invasive Shot Blocking Device for Reducing Pain of In-office Injections in Hand Surgery.","authors":"Brian D Rinker, David A Atashroo, Megan A Stout, F Ryan Wermeling","doi":"10.1177/1558944719884655","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The gate control theory asserts that non-painful stimuli can block pain perception. The ShotBlocker™ device is a plastic disk with blunt projections that rests on the skin, and we hypothesize that it will reduce pain during hand injections. <b>Methods:</b> This is a prospective randomized trial of 117 patients undergoing injections for common hand conditions. Patients were randomized into 3 groups: device, placebo (device with projections removed), and control. Patients recorded on an analog pain scale the pain severity of the injection, as well as their most recent tetanus shot. A normalized pain score was obtained from the difference between the injection and tetanus shot pain scores. The mean non-normalized and normalized scores for each treatment group were compared to the control group using the Wilcoxon signed rank test. <b>Results:</b> There were 91 women and 26 men. Common diagnoses included trigger finger (n = 53), DeQuervain's tendonitis (n = 33), and basal joint arthritis (n = 22). The groups did not differ significantly in age, gender, or diagnosis. Mean pain score in the device group was 5.2 out of 10, and it was 5.7 for the control group. The normalized pain score in the device group was significantly lower than the control group. Normalized and non-normalized pain scores for the placebo group were not significantly lower than the control group. <b>Conclusions:</b> The shot blocking device effectively reduced pain of injection versus controls when pain scores were normalized for pain tolerance. The modified device did not reduce the pain of injection, suggesting that gate control is the mechanism of action.</p>","PeriodicalId":76630,"journal":{"name":"The Hand","volume":"16 1","pages":"770-775"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8647313/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Hand","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1558944719884655","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/11/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The gate control theory asserts that non-painful stimuli can block pain perception. The ShotBlocker™ device is a plastic disk with blunt projections that rests on the skin, and we hypothesize that it will reduce pain during hand injections. Methods: This is a prospective randomized trial of 117 patients undergoing injections for common hand conditions. Patients were randomized into 3 groups: device, placebo (device with projections removed), and control. Patients recorded on an analog pain scale the pain severity of the injection, as well as their most recent tetanus shot. A normalized pain score was obtained from the difference between the injection and tetanus shot pain scores. The mean non-normalized and normalized scores for each treatment group were compared to the control group using the Wilcoxon signed rank test. Results: There were 91 women and 26 men. Common diagnoses included trigger finger (n = 53), DeQuervain's tendonitis (n = 33), and basal joint arthritis (n = 22). The groups did not differ significantly in age, gender, or diagnosis. Mean pain score in the device group was 5.2 out of 10, and it was 5.7 for the control group. The normalized pain score in the device group was significantly lower than the control group. Normalized and non-normalized pain scores for the placebo group were not significantly lower than the control group. Conclusions: The shot blocking device effectively reduced pain of injection versus controls when pain scores were normalized for pain tolerance. The modified device did not reduce the pain of injection, suggesting that gate control is the mechanism of action.

无创注射封堵器减轻手外科办公室注射疼痛的效果
背景:门控理论认为非疼痛刺激可以阻断疼痛感知。ShotBlocker™ 这个装置是一个塑料圆盘,上面有钝的突起,放在皮肤上,我们假设它可以减轻手部注射时的疼痛。方法:这是一项前瞻性随机试验,共有117名因常见手部疾病接受注射的患者。患者被随机分为3组:装置、安慰剂(去除投影的装置)和对照组。患者在模拟疼痛量表上记录注射的疼痛严重程度,以及他们最近的破伤风疫苗。根据注射和破伤风注射疼痛评分之间的差异获得标准化疼痛评分。使用Wilcoxon符号秩检验将每个治疗组的平均非标准化和标准化得分与对照组进行比较。结果:女性91例,男性26例。常见的诊断包括扳机指(n=53)、DeQuervain肌腱炎(n=33)和基底关节炎(n=22)。两组在年龄、性别或诊断上没有显著差异。器械组的平均疼痛评分为5.2分(满分10分),对照组为5.7分。器械组的标准化疼痛评分显著低于对照组。安慰剂组的标准化和非标准化疼痛评分并不显著低于对照组。结论:与对照组相比,当疼痛评分达到疼痛耐受性标准时,注射阻断装置有效地减轻了注射疼痛。改进后的装置并没有减轻注射的疼痛,这表明门控是作用机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信