Risk assessment for financial accounting: modeling probability of default

IF 5.7 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Tobias Filusch
{"title":"Risk assessment for financial accounting: modeling probability of default","authors":"Tobias Filusch","doi":"10.1108/JRF-02-2020-0033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper aims to introduce and tests models for point-in-time probability of default (PD) term structures as required by international accounting standards. Corresponding accounting standards prescribe that expected credit losses (ECLs) be recognized for the impairment of financial instruments, for which the probability of default strongly embodies the included default risk. This paper fills the research gap resulting from a lack of models that expand upon existing risk management techniques, link PD term structures of different risk classes and are compliant with accounting standards, e.g. offering the flexibility for business cycle-related variations.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe author modifies the non-homogeneous continuous-time Markov chain model (NHCTMCM) by Bluhm and Overbeck (2007a, 2007b) and introduces the generalized through-the-cycle model (GTTCM), which generalizes the homogeneous Markov chain approach to a point-in-time model. As part of the overall ECL estimation, an empirical study using Standard and Poor’s (S&P) transition data compares the performance of these models using the mean squared error.\n\n\nFindings\nThe models can reflect observed PD term structures associated with different time periods. The modified NHCTMCM performs best at the expense of higher complexity and only its cumulative PD term structures can be transferred to valid ECL-relevant unconditional PD term structures. For direct calibration to these unconditional PD term structures, the GTTCM is only slightly worse. Moreover, it requires only half of the number of parameters that its competitor does. Both models are useful additions to the implementation of accounting regulations.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe tests are only carried out for 15-year samples within a 35-year span of available S&P transition data. Furthermore, a point-in-time forecast of the PD term structure requires a link to the business cycle, which seems difficult to find, but is in principle necessary corresponding to the accounting requirements.\n\n\nPractical implications\nResearch findings are useful for practitioners, who apply and develop the ECL models of financial accounting.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe innovative models expand upon the existing methodologies for assessing financial risks, motivated by the practical requirements of new financial accounting standards.\n","PeriodicalId":46579,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Risk Finance","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Risk Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/JRF-02-2020-0033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to introduce and tests models for point-in-time probability of default (PD) term structures as required by international accounting standards. Corresponding accounting standards prescribe that expected credit losses (ECLs) be recognized for the impairment of financial instruments, for which the probability of default strongly embodies the included default risk. This paper fills the research gap resulting from a lack of models that expand upon existing risk management techniques, link PD term structures of different risk classes and are compliant with accounting standards, e.g. offering the flexibility for business cycle-related variations. Design/methodology/approach The author modifies the non-homogeneous continuous-time Markov chain model (NHCTMCM) by Bluhm and Overbeck (2007a, 2007b) and introduces the generalized through-the-cycle model (GTTCM), which generalizes the homogeneous Markov chain approach to a point-in-time model. As part of the overall ECL estimation, an empirical study using Standard and Poor’s (S&P) transition data compares the performance of these models using the mean squared error. Findings The models can reflect observed PD term structures associated with different time periods. The modified NHCTMCM performs best at the expense of higher complexity and only its cumulative PD term structures can be transferred to valid ECL-relevant unconditional PD term structures. For direct calibration to these unconditional PD term structures, the GTTCM is only slightly worse. Moreover, it requires only half of the number of parameters that its competitor does. Both models are useful additions to the implementation of accounting regulations. Research limitations/implications The tests are only carried out for 15-year samples within a 35-year span of available S&P transition data. Furthermore, a point-in-time forecast of the PD term structure requires a link to the business cycle, which seems difficult to find, but is in principle necessary corresponding to the accounting requirements. Practical implications Research findings are useful for practitioners, who apply and develop the ECL models of financial accounting. Originality/value The innovative models expand upon the existing methodologies for assessing financial risks, motivated by the practical requirements of new financial accounting standards.
财务会计风险评估:违约概率建模
目的介绍并检验国际会计准则要求的违约概率期限结构模型。相应的会计准则规定,金融工具的减值应确认预期信用损失,其中违约概率强烈体现了所包含的违约风险。本文填补了由于缺乏对现有风险管理技术进行扩展、将不同风险类别的PD期限结构联系起来并符合会计准则的模型而导致的研究空白,例如为与商业周期相关的变化提供灵活性。设计/方法论/方法作者修改了Bluhm和Overbeck(2007a,2007b)的非齐次连续时间马尔可夫链模型(NHCTMCM),并引入了广义贯穿循环模型(GTTCM),该模型将齐次马尔可夫链方法推广到时间点模型。作为总体ECL估计的一部分,一项使用标准普尔(s&P)转换数据的实证研究使用均方误差对这些模型的性能进行了比较。发现模型可以反映观察到的与不同时间段相关的PD项结构。改进的NHCTMCM以更高的复杂性为代价表现最好,并且只有其累积的PD项结构才能转移到有效的ECL相关的无条件PD项结构。对于这些无条件PD项结构的直接校准,GTTCM只是稍微差一点。此外,它只需要其竞争对手所需参数数量的一半。这两种模式都是执行会计条例的有益补充。研究局限性/含义该测试仅针对35年内可用标准普尔过渡数据的15年样本进行。此外,PD期限结构的时间点预测需要与商业周期建立联系,这似乎很难找到,但原则上是必要的,与会计要求相对应。实际含义研究结果对应用和发展财务会计ECL模型的从业者很有用。独创性/价值创新模型扩展了现有的金融风险评估方法,其动机是新的财务会计准则的实际要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Risk Finance
Journal of Risk Finance BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: The Journal of Risk Finance provides a rigorous forum for the publication of high quality peer-reviewed theoretical and empirical research articles, by both academic and industry experts, related to financial risks and risk management. Articles, including review articles, empirical and conceptual, which display thoughtful, accurate research and be rigorous in all regards, are most welcome on the following topics: -Securitization; derivatives and structured financial products -Financial risk management -Regulation of risk management -Risk and corporate governance -Liability management -Systemic risk -Cryptocurrency and risk management -Credit arbitrage methods -Corporate social responsibility and risk management -Enterprise risk management -FinTech and risk -Insurtech -Regtech -Blockchain and risk -Climate change and risk
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信