{"title":"Mobile work, mobility, and mobile devices: Responding to a societal shift","authors":"K. Stephens","doi":"10.1177/20501579221126956","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The global community of mobile communication scholars has accomplished much in the past 10 years. We have more precisely defined mobile communication scholarship and began to focus on spatial, temporal, and power dynamics surrounding mobility and mobile devices (e.g., Campbell, 2013; Frith & Özkul, 2019; Stephens, 2018). Our scholarship has led the way by publishing research on diverse types of work and workers around the globe (e.g., construction workers: Pink et al., 2014; janitorial staff: Stephens & Ford, 2016; livestock farmers: Vidal-González & Fernández-Piqueras, 2021). Now, in a world that has recently experienced multiple cascading disasters, including a global pandemic, mobile communication has become even more important, and in the next five years we have new occasions to contribute our theoretical and empirical research. Before the COVID-19 pandemic broke out in the US, 7% of the population were considered full-time mobile workers—worked outside a designated work location—so mobile work is not a new practice (Parker et al., 2020). Scholars in a host of fields have studied telework, virtual work, and the use of mobile technologies in organizations (e.g., Watson-Manheim et al., 2002). What is different is that during 2020, we experienced extreme growth as the percentage of people working outside a formal workplace full time jumped from 7% to 50% (Parker et al., 2020). With that shift came a host of new challenges: parents could not find childcare outside the home, care responsibilities more often fell on women, people were less mobile as travel came to a halt, and many people having to work from home did not have a dedicated place to do their job","PeriodicalId":46650,"journal":{"name":"Mobile Media & Communication","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mobile Media & Communication","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20501579221126956","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
The global community of mobile communication scholars has accomplished much in the past 10 years. We have more precisely defined mobile communication scholarship and began to focus on spatial, temporal, and power dynamics surrounding mobility and mobile devices (e.g., Campbell, 2013; Frith & Özkul, 2019; Stephens, 2018). Our scholarship has led the way by publishing research on diverse types of work and workers around the globe (e.g., construction workers: Pink et al., 2014; janitorial staff: Stephens & Ford, 2016; livestock farmers: Vidal-González & Fernández-Piqueras, 2021). Now, in a world that has recently experienced multiple cascading disasters, including a global pandemic, mobile communication has become even more important, and in the next five years we have new occasions to contribute our theoretical and empirical research. Before the COVID-19 pandemic broke out in the US, 7% of the population were considered full-time mobile workers—worked outside a designated work location—so mobile work is not a new practice (Parker et al., 2020). Scholars in a host of fields have studied telework, virtual work, and the use of mobile technologies in organizations (e.g., Watson-Manheim et al., 2002). What is different is that during 2020, we experienced extreme growth as the percentage of people working outside a formal workplace full time jumped from 7% to 50% (Parker et al., 2020). With that shift came a host of new challenges: parents could not find childcare outside the home, care responsibilities more often fell on women, people were less mobile as travel came to a halt, and many people having to work from home did not have a dedicated place to do their job
在过去的10年里,全球移动通信学者群体取得了很大成就。我们已经更精确地定义了移动通信学术,并开始关注围绕移动和移动设备的空间、时间和功率动态(例如,Campbell,2013;Frith&Özkul,2019;斯蒂芬斯,2018)。我们的奖学金率先发表了关于全球不同类型工作和工人的研究(例如,建筑工人:Pink等人,2014;清洁工:Stephens和Ford,2016;畜牧业农民:Vidal González和Fernández-Piqueras,2021)。现在,在一个最近经历了包括全球疫情在内的多重级联灾难的世界里,移动通信变得更加重要,在未来五年里,我们有新的机会来贡献我们的理论和实证研究。在新冠肺炎疫情在美国爆发之前,7%的人口被认为是全职流动工人——在指定的工作地点以外工作——因此流动工作并不是一种新的做法(Parker et al.,2020)。许多领域的学者研究了远程工作、虚拟工作和移动技术在组织中的使用(例如,Watson-Manheim等人,2002年)。不同的是,在2020年,我们经历了极端的增长,在正式工作场所以外全职工作的人的比例从7%跃升至50%(Parker等人,2020)。随着这种转变,出现了一系列新的挑战:父母无法在家外找到托儿服务,照顾责任更多地落在女性身上,随着旅行的停止,人们的流动性降低,许多不得不在家工作的人没有专门的地方工作
期刊介绍:
Mobile Media & Communication is a peer-reviewed forum for international, interdisciplinary academic research on the dynamic field of mobile media and communication. Mobile Media & Communication draws on a wide and continually renewed range of disciplines, engaging broadly in the concept of mobility itself.