Comparative analysis of regression algorithms for the prediction of NavIC differential corrections

IF 1.2 Q4 REMOTE SENSING
Madhu Krishna Karthan, Naveen Kumar Perumalla
{"title":"Comparative analysis of regression algorithms for the prediction of NavIC differential corrections","authors":"Madhu Krishna Karthan, Naveen Kumar Perumalla","doi":"10.1515/jag-2023-0025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Indian Regional Navigation Satellite System (IRNSS) or Navigation with Indian Constellation (NavIC) provides positioning, navigation and timing information services to various users in Indian region. Standalone NavIC may not meet the position accuracies for certain application such as civil aviation. Differential NavIC is used for improving the position accuracy of rover receiver, which make use of differential corrections (transmitted from reference station). However, if the satellite signals are temporarily lost due to abruptly changing atmosphere, satellite health issues or if the satellite signals are attenuated due to city infrastructures in urban areas, tree canopies, the accuracy of NavIC will be degraded. This article compares regression tree and bagging tree based differential corrections prediction algorithm with the actual differential corrections, by considering the NavIC satellite signal strength (C/No) and elevation angle (El), to improve the NavIC positioning accuracy. The improvement in the position accuracy is obtained by utilizing predicted differential corrections. The position accuracy of rover using actual differential corrections (2DRMS – 3.09 m), regression tree predicted differential corrections (2DRMS – 5.96 m) and bagged tree predicted differential corrections (2DRMS – 3.06 m) are compared. Here, the rover accuracy using actual differential corrections and bagged tree predicted differential corrections are approximately equal. So, the position accuracy using bagged tree predicted differential corrections are accurate when compared to regression tree predicted differential corrections.","PeriodicalId":45494,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Geodesy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Geodesy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jag-2023-0025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REMOTE SENSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Indian Regional Navigation Satellite System (IRNSS) or Navigation with Indian Constellation (NavIC) provides positioning, navigation and timing information services to various users in Indian region. Standalone NavIC may not meet the position accuracies for certain application such as civil aviation. Differential NavIC is used for improving the position accuracy of rover receiver, which make use of differential corrections (transmitted from reference station). However, if the satellite signals are temporarily lost due to abruptly changing atmosphere, satellite health issues or if the satellite signals are attenuated due to city infrastructures in urban areas, tree canopies, the accuracy of NavIC will be degraded. This article compares regression tree and bagging tree based differential corrections prediction algorithm with the actual differential corrections, by considering the NavIC satellite signal strength (C/No) and elevation angle (El), to improve the NavIC positioning accuracy. The improvement in the position accuracy is obtained by utilizing predicted differential corrections. The position accuracy of rover using actual differential corrections (2DRMS – 3.09 m), regression tree predicted differential corrections (2DRMS – 5.96 m) and bagged tree predicted differential corrections (2DRMS – 3.06 m) are compared. Here, the rover accuracy using actual differential corrections and bagged tree predicted differential corrections are approximately equal. So, the position accuracy using bagged tree predicted differential corrections are accurate when compared to regression tree predicted differential corrections.
NavIC微分校正预测回归算法的比较分析
摘要印度区域导航卫星系统(IRNSS)或印度星座导航系统(NavIC)为印度地区的各种用户提供定位、导航和定时信息服务。独立NavIC可能无法满足某些应用(如民航)的位置精度。差分导航IC用于提高漫游者接收器的位置精度,该接收器利用差分校正(从参考站发送)。然而,如果卫星信号由于大气突变、卫星健康问题而暂时丢失,或者如果卫星信号因城市地区的城市基础设施、树冠而衰减,则NavIC的准确性将降低。本文通过考虑NavIC卫星信号强度(C/No)和仰角(El),将基于回归树和套袋树的差分校正预测算法与实际差分校正进行比较,以提高NavIC的定位精度。位置精度的提高是通过利用预测的微分校正来获得的。使用实际差分校正的月球车位置精度(2DRMS–3.09 m) ,回归树预测的差分校正(2DRMS–5.96 m) 和袋装树预测差分校正(2DRMS–3.06 m) 进行了比较。这里,使用实际差分校正和袋装树预测差分校正的漫游车精度大致相等。因此,与回归树预测的差分校正相比,使用袋装树预测差分校正的位置精度是准确的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Geodesy
Journal of Applied Geodesy REMOTE SENSING-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
30
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信