State Leadership vs. Lawyers’ Entrepreneurship: The Globalization Trajectories of Chinese Legal Professionals Under the Belt & Road Initiative

Q3 Social Sciences
Jing Li
{"title":"State Leadership vs. Lawyers’ Entrepreneurship: The Globalization Trajectories of Chinese Legal Professionals Under the Belt & Road Initiative","authors":"Jing Li","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3753501","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Based on the analysis of the online profiles of 205 BRI Talent Bank lawyers as accredited by China’s national bar association, this article generates important empirical knowledge about the approaches and processes that a nation-state may use in directing the internationalization of legal professionals. In addition to designing the general roadmap and offering broad incentives, the state has demonstrated a much more hands-on approach. By collecting the so-called “state-adjacent” lawyers and commissioning them to take some concrete first steps stipulated in the roadmap, the Chinese state effectively envisions them as role models for other lawyers to follow to ensure that its policy goals regarding the BRI are achieved in the Chinese legal profession. Such vision, however, is not very well-realized which is particularly evidenced by the zero-accession rate of Talent Bank law firms into the state-led BRI Lawyers Association initiative. These findings reaffirm that Chinese lawyers are calculative and pragmatic entrepreneurs who know how to strike the balance between winning legitimacy from the state and pursuing their own internationalization trajectories based on their own needs and competence. Perhaps contrary to the expectations of the state, such an image does not seem to change much even regarding a group of lawyers that have close ties with and/or hold official approvals from the state.","PeriodicalId":39188,"journal":{"name":"Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies","volume":"29 1","pages":"130 - 85"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3753501","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:Based on the analysis of the online profiles of 205 BRI Talent Bank lawyers as accredited by China’s national bar association, this article generates important empirical knowledge about the approaches and processes that a nation-state may use in directing the internationalization of legal professionals. In addition to designing the general roadmap and offering broad incentives, the state has demonstrated a much more hands-on approach. By collecting the so-called “state-adjacent” lawyers and commissioning them to take some concrete first steps stipulated in the roadmap, the Chinese state effectively envisions them as role models for other lawyers to follow to ensure that its policy goals regarding the BRI are achieved in the Chinese legal profession. Such vision, however, is not very well-realized which is particularly evidenced by the zero-accession rate of Talent Bank law firms into the state-led BRI Lawyers Association initiative. These findings reaffirm that Chinese lawyers are calculative and pragmatic entrepreneurs who know how to strike the balance between winning legitimacy from the state and pursuing their own internationalization trajectories based on their own needs and competence. Perhaps contrary to the expectations of the state, such an image does not seem to change much even regarding a group of lawyers that have close ties with and/or hold official approvals from the state.
国家领导与律师创业:“一带一路”背景下中国法律人才的全球化轨迹
摘要:基于对205名经中国律师协会认可的“一带一路”人才库律师的在线简介的分析,本文得出了关于民族国家在指导法律专业人员国际化方面可以使用的方法和过程的重要经验知识。除了设计总体路线图和提供广泛的激励措施外,该州还展示了一种更加实际的方法。通过收集所谓的“与国家相邻”的律师,并委托他们采取路线图中规定的一些具体的第一步,中国政府有效地将他们视为其他律师效仿的榜样,以确保中国法律界实现其关于“一带一路”的政策目标。然而,这一愿景并没有很好地实现,人才银行律师事务所加入国家领导的“一带一路”倡议的比率为零尤其证明了这一点。这些发现重申,中国律师是精打细算、务实的企业家,他们知道如何在从国家赢得合法性和基于自己的需求和能力追求自己的国际化轨道之间取得平衡。也许与国家的期望相反,即使是对于一群与国家关系密切和/或获得国家官方批准的律师来说,这种形象似乎也没有太大变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信