Postpartum Anxiety and Intrapsychic Vulnerability Reflected by Early Maladaptive Schemas

IF 0.6 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
J. Molnár, K. Kósa, Z. Fekete, Å. Münnich
{"title":"Postpartum Anxiety and Intrapsychic Vulnerability Reflected by Early Maladaptive Schemas","authors":"J. Molnár, K. Kósa, Z. Fekete, Å. Münnich","doi":"10.5708/EJMH.13.2018.1.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The prevalence of postpartum anxiety is high and its negative consequences are significant. \nMost research studies have aimed at exploring the demographic and psychosocial risk factors \nwhile neglecting factors of intrapsychic vulnerability. The aim of our study is to examine postpartum \nanxiety from this aspect, that is, uncovering the early relational experiences of mothers, \nspecifically regarding their early maladaptive schemas. \nMethods: 125 women participated in online data collection in the first year after giving birth. \nMaternal anxiety was measured with the postpartum version of STAI-S, while early maladaptive \nschemas were assessed with the Schema Questionnaire. \nResults: In terms of demographics, most of the mothers in our sample had middle-class characteristics, \nbut 21.6% had clinical, and 34.4% had subclinical levels of anxiety. Our results confirmed \na significant, direct effect of maladaptive schemas on postpartum anxiety in case of 13 of the 15 \nmeasured schemas. \nDiscussion: This study draws attention to the intrapsychic vulnerability of mothers as a highly neglected \netiological aspect of postpartum anxiety. Further research of intrapsychic and, especially, \nattachment-related vulnerability should be carried out to identify at-risk women and treat postpartum \nanxiety more adequately. \nLimitations: The sample consisted of highly educated, married women with planned children, so \nthe results are not representative for mothers in general.","PeriodicalId":42949,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Mental Health","volume":"13 1","pages":"70-81"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5708/EJMH.13.2018.1.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: The prevalence of postpartum anxiety is high and its negative consequences are significant. Most research studies have aimed at exploring the demographic and psychosocial risk factors while neglecting factors of intrapsychic vulnerability. The aim of our study is to examine postpartum anxiety from this aspect, that is, uncovering the early relational experiences of mothers, specifically regarding their early maladaptive schemas. Methods: 125 women participated in online data collection in the first year after giving birth. Maternal anxiety was measured with the postpartum version of STAI-S, while early maladaptive schemas were assessed with the Schema Questionnaire. Results: In terms of demographics, most of the mothers in our sample had middle-class characteristics, but 21.6% had clinical, and 34.4% had subclinical levels of anxiety. Our results confirmed a significant, direct effect of maladaptive schemas on postpartum anxiety in case of 13 of the 15 measured schemas. Discussion: This study draws attention to the intrapsychic vulnerability of mothers as a highly neglected etiological aspect of postpartum anxiety. Further research of intrapsychic and, especially, attachment-related vulnerability should be carried out to identify at-risk women and treat postpartum anxiety more adequately. Limitations: The sample consisted of highly educated, married women with planned children, so the results are not representative for mothers in general.
早期适应不良图式反映的产后焦虑和心理脆弱性
背景:产后焦虑的患病率很高,其负面后果也很严重。大多数研究旨在探索人口统计学和心理社会风险因素,而忽略了心理脆弱性因素。我们研究的目的是从这一方面考察产后焦虑,即揭示母亲早期的关系经历,特别是关于她们早期适应不良的模式。方法:125名女性在产后第一年参与了在线数据收集。产妇焦虑采用产后版STAI-S进行测量,而早期适应不良图式采用图式问卷进行评估。结果:在人口统计学方面,我们样本中的大多数母亲都有中产阶级特征,但21.6%的母亲有临床焦虑,34.4%的母亲有亚临床焦虑。我们的研究结果证实,在15个测量图式中的13个图式中,适应不良图式对产后焦虑有显著的直接影响。讨论:这项研究引起了人们对母亲心理脆弱性的关注,这是产后焦虑的一个被高度忽视的病因方面。应进一步研究心理内部,尤其是依恋相关的脆弱性,以确定有风险的女性,并更充分地治疗产后焦虑。局限性:样本由受过高等教育、有计划生育子女的已婚妇女组成,因此结果对一般母亲来说并不具有代表性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Mental Health
European Journal of Mental Health PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
14.30%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Mental Health, an open-access, peer reviewed, interdisciplinary, professional journal concerned with mental health, personal well-being and its supporting ecosystems that acknowledge the importance of people’s interactions with their environments, established in 2006, is published on 280 pages per volume in English and German by the Semmelweis University Institute of Mental Health. The journal’s professional oversight is provided by the Editor-in-Chief and an international Editorial Board, assisted by an Advisory Board. The semiannual journal, with issues appearing in June and December, is published in Budapest. The journal aims at the dissemination of the latest scientific research on mental health and well-being in Europe. It seeks novel, integrative and comprehensive, applied as well as theoretical articles that are inspiring for professionals and practitioners with different fields of interest: social and natural sciences, humanities and different segments of mental health research and practice. The primary thematic focus of EJMH is the social-ecological antecedents of mental health and foundations of human well-being. Most specifically, the journal welcomes contributions that present high-quality, original research findings on well-being and mental health across the lifespan and in historical perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信