The Things We Already Know and the Things We're Set Up Not to See: Folkloristics, COVID-19, and the Traps of Amplification

IF 0.4 3区 社会学 0 FOLKLORE
Whitney Phillips, Jeffrey A. Tolbert
{"title":"The Things We Already Know and the Things We're Set Up Not to See: Folkloristics, COVID-19, and the Traps of Amplification","authors":"Whitney Phillips, Jeffrey A. Tolbert","doi":"10.2979/jfolkrese.60.1.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:COVID-19 folklore can be deadly. It also poses a particular set of challenges to researchers endeavoring to study it, and indeed, to researchers who are not actively studying it yet still find themselves confronted by it on their social media feeds. These challenges emerge from digital constraints and affordances that obscure—and are designed to obscure—digital folklore's full context, resulting in vexing problems of amplification, rampant artifactualization, and potential weaponization by bad actors. Folklorists can minimize these outcomes by drawing from methodological insights of the past, while at the same time zeroing in on the unique contours of the present. Erving Goffman's analysis of everyday performance, for instance, provides a critical methodological entry point to digital ethnographies, with one internet-era update. Online, seemingly backstage elements—from digital tools to platform affordances to algorithms—are a critical part of the frontstage. The ethnographic vistas that open up when the online backstage is reframed as the online frontstage help foster stronger, more nuanced digital folkloristics. This also encourages researchers to reflect on the reciprocal influences of technologies, and how we all impact our networks through everyday actions like sharing, commenting, and liking.","PeriodicalId":44620,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF FOLKLORE RESEARCH","volume":"60 1","pages":"77 - 98"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF FOLKLORE RESEARCH","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2979/jfolkrese.60.1.06","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"FOLKLORE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:COVID-19 folklore can be deadly. It also poses a particular set of challenges to researchers endeavoring to study it, and indeed, to researchers who are not actively studying it yet still find themselves confronted by it on their social media feeds. These challenges emerge from digital constraints and affordances that obscure—and are designed to obscure—digital folklore's full context, resulting in vexing problems of amplification, rampant artifactualization, and potential weaponization by bad actors. Folklorists can minimize these outcomes by drawing from methodological insights of the past, while at the same time zeroing in on the unique contours of the present. Erving Goffman's analysis of everyday performance, for instance, provides a critical methodological entry point to digital ethnographies, with one internet-era update. Online, seemingly backstage elements—from digital tools to platform affordances to algorithms—are a critical part of the frontstage. The ethnographic vistas that open up when the online backstage is reframed as the online frontstage help foster stronger, more nuanced digital folkloristics. This also encourages researchers to reflect on the reciprocal influences of technologies, and how we all impact our networks through everyday actions like sharing, commenting, and liking.
我们已经知道的事情和我们不想看到的事情:民俗、新冠肺炎和放大陷阱
摘要:新冠肺炎民间传说可能致命。它也给努力研究它的研究人员带来了一系列特殊的挑战,事实上,也给那些没有积极研究它但仍然在社交媒体上发现自己面临它的研究者带来了挑战。这些挑战源于数字约束和可供性,它们模糊了——而且是为了模糊——数字民间传说的全部背景,导致了放大、猖獗的人工制造和不良行为者潜在的武器化等令人烦恼的问题。民俗学家可以通过借鉴过去的方法论见解来最大限度地减少这些结果,同时关注现在的独特轮廓。例如,Erving Goffman对日常表现的分析为数字民族志提供了一个关键的方法论切入点,并对互联网时代进行了更新。从数字工具到平台可供性再到算法,看似后台的在线元素是前台的关键部分。当在线后台被重新定义为在线前台时,民族志视野就打开了,这有助于培养更强大、更细致的数字民俗学。这也鼓励研究人员反思技术的相互影响,以及我们如何通过分享、评论和点赞等日常行为影响我们的网络。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊介绍: The Journal of Folklore Research has provided an international forum for current theory and research among scholars of traditional culture since 1964. Each issue includes topical, incisive articles of current theoretical interest to folklore and ethnomusicology as international disciplines, as well as essays that address the fieldwork experience and the intellectual history of folklore and ethnomusicology studies. Contributors include scholars and professionals in additional fields, including anthropology, area studies, communication, cultural studies, history, linguistics, literature, performance studies, religion, and semiotics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信