Bank risk exposures and bank stability in Africa: the role of regulations in a non-linear model

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Daniel Ofori‐Sasu, B. Mekpor, Eunice Adu-Darko, E. Sarpong-Kumankoma
{"title":"Bank risk exposures and bank stability in Africa: the role of regulations in a non-linear model","authors":"Daniel Ofori‐Sasu, B. Mekpor, Eunice Adu-Darko, E. Sarpong-Kumankoma","doi":"10.1108/jfrc-08-2022-0099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper aims to examine the interaction effect of regulations (monetary and macro-prudential) in explaining the possible non-linear effect of bank risk exposures (credit risk and insolvency risk) on banking stability in Africa.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe study uses a two-step system generalized method of moments (GMM) estimator for a data set of banks across 54 African countries over the period 2006–2020.\n\n\nFindings\nThe authors find that the relationships between bank credit risk–bank stability and bank insolvency risk–bank stability are non-linear and characterized by the presence of optimal thresholds, which are 5.3456 for credit risk and 2.3643 for insolvency. Contrary to their positive effects below these optimal thresholds, credit risk and insolvency risk become negatively linked to bank stability in Africa. The authors find that macro-prudential action and monetary policy both have a positive and significant relationship with bank stability. The authors provide evidence to support that the marginal effect of excessive credit risk and insolvency risk on bank stability is reduced when interacted with monetary and macro-prudential regulations, and the impact is significant in strong institutional environment.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nFuture research should extend data to include developing and emerging economies in the world. Also, policymakers, researchers and practitioners should consider different regulatory and institutional frameworks in explaining the relationship between the thresholds of bank risk exposures and bank stability in the world.\n\n\nPractical implications\nRegulatory authorities should have to deeply reform their financial systems, develop risk-based regulatory framework and effective supervision mechanism relating to appropriate techniques that maintain an optimal and desired level of bank risks and risk-taking behaviours required to ensure a stable banking system.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nTo the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study to examine how different regulatory frameworks shape the non-linear impact of bank risk exposures on bank stability in Africa.\n","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jfrc-08-2022-0099","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to examine the interaction effect of regulations (monetary and macro-prudential) in explaining the possible non-linear effect of bank risk exposures (credit risk and insolvency risk) on banking stability in Africa. Design/methodology/approach The study uses a two-step system generalized method of moments (GMM) estimator for a data set of banks across 54 African countries over the period 2006–2020. Findings The authors find that the relationships between bank credit risk–bank stability and bank insolvency risk–bank stability are non-linear and characterized by the presence of optimal thresholds, which are 5.3456 for credit risk and 2.3643 for insolvency. Contrary to their positive effects below these optimal thresholds, credit risk and insolvency risk become negatively linked to bank stability in Africa. The authors find that macro-prudential action and monetary policy both have a positive and significant relationship with bank stability. The authors provide evidence to support that the marginal effect of excessive credit risk and insolvency risk on bank stability is reduced when interacted with monetary and macro-prudential regulations, and the impact is significant in strong institutional environment. Research limitations/implications Future research should extend data to include developing and emerging economies in the world. Also, policymakers, researchers and practitioners should consider different regulatory and institutional frameworks in explaining the relationship between the thresholds of bank risk exposures and bank stability in the world. Practical implications Regulatory authorities should have to deeply reform their financial systems, develop risk-based regulatory framework and effective supervision mechanism relating to appropriate techniques that maintain an optimal and desired level of bank risks and risk-taking behaviours required to ensure a stable banking system. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study to examine how different regulatory frameworks shape the non-linear impact of bank risk exposures on bank stability in Africa.
非洲银行风险敞口与银行稳定性:监管在非线性模型中的作用
目的本文旨在检验监管(货币和宏观审慎)在解释银行风险敞口(信贷风险和破产风险)对非洲银行稳定性可能产生的非线性影响方面的相互作用。设计/方法/方法该研究对2006-2020年期间54个非洲国家的银行数据集使用了两步系统广义矩量法(GMM)估计量,信贷风险为5.3456,破产风险为2.3643。与低于这些最佳阈值的积极影响相反,信贷风险和破产风险与非洲的银行稳定成了负相关。作者发现,宏观审慎行动和货币政策都与银行稳定性有着积极而显著的关系。作者提供的证据支持,当与货币和宏观审慎监管相互作用时,过度信贷风险和破产风险对银行稳定性的边际影响降低,并且在强大的制度环境中影响显著。研究局限性/含义未来的研究应将数据扩展到世界上的发展中经济体和新兴经济体。此外,政策制定者、研究人员和从业者在解释世界银行风险敞口阈值与银行稳定性之间的关系时,应考虑不同的监管和制度框架。实际含义监管机构应深入改革其金融体系,制定基于风险的监管框架和有效的监管机制,涉及适当的技术,以保持最佳和期望的银行风险水平和风险承担行为,确保银行体系稳定。原创性/价值据作者所知,这是第一项研究不同的监管框架如何影响银行风险敞口对非洲银行稳定性的非线性影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信