The effectiveness and compliance of surgical face mask wearing in the operating suite environment: An integrated review

Q3 Nursing
N. Ogo, P. Foran
{"title":"The effectiveness and compliance of surgical face mask wearing in the operating suite environment: An integrated review","authors":"N. Ogo, P. Foran","doi":"10.26550/2209-1092.1105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Problem identification: Surgical face masks have been used for over a century in the operating room (OR); firstly, as it has been believed that they may reduce surgical site infections (SSIs) in patients and, secondly, as personal protective equipment (PPE) for staff. However, recent studies have reported disparities in the efficacy of wearing surgical face masks including inconsistency in their use. This integrative review aims to investigate the effects of surgical masks in the OR, in regard to maintaining both patient and staff safety, and will discuss compliance or lack thereof in face mask usage for the entire multidisciplinary team. Literature search: Four electronic health databases were used to identify the relevant research: CINAHL, Medline, EMCare and Cochrane Library. The reference lists of retrieved articles were also manually searched and appropriate literature retrieved. Data evaluation synthesis: Inclusion and exclusion criteria were used revealing that 15 articles fully met the criteria which were critiqued (see Table 2 in Supplemental material for the literature matrix). Implications for practice: SSIs are multifactorial and no reviewed studies looked at causative considerations such as comorbidities and other variables (such as hypothermia) which could all contribute to this post-operative complication. However, there is evidence to suggest that surgical face masks are useful in decreasing the biological load in the theatre environment. They are also a vital piece of PPE that should be worn to protect the perioperative team from blood and bodily fluid splatter that commonly occur.","PeriodicalId":37332,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perioperative Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Perioperative Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26550/2209-1092.1105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Problem identification: Surgical face masks have been used for over a century in the operating room (OR); firstly, as it has been believed that they may reduce surgical site infections (SSIs) in patients and, secondly, as personal protective equipment (PPE) for staff. However, recent studies have reported disparities in the efficacy of wearing surgical face masks including inconsistency in their use. This integrative review aims to investigate the effects of surgical masks in the OR, in regard to maintaining both patient and staff safety, and will discuss compliance or lack thereof in face mask usage for the entire multidisciplinary team. Literature search: Four electronic health databases were used to identify the relevant research: CINAHL, Medline, EMCare and Cochrane Library. The reference lists of retrieved articles were also manually searched and appropriate literature retrieved. Data evaluation synthesis: Inclusion and exclusion criteria were used revealing that 15 articles fully met the criteria which were critiqued (see Table 2 in Supplemental material for the literature matrix). Implications for practice: SSIs are multifactorial and no reviewed studies looked at causative considerations such as comorbidities and other variables (such as hypothermia) which could all contribute to this post-operative complication. However, there is evidence to suggest that surgical face masks are useful in decreasing the biological load in the theatre environment. They are also a vital piece of PPE that should be worn to protect the perioperative team from blood and bodily fluid splatter that commonly occur.
手术室环境中佩戴外科口罩的有效性和依从性:一项综合综述
问题识别:外科口罩在手术室已经使用了一个多世纪;首先,人们认为它们可以减少患者的手术部位感染,其次,作为工作人员的个人防护装备。然而,最近的研究报告称,佩戴外科口罩的效果存在差异,包括使用不一致。这项综合审查旨在调查外科口罩在手术室中对维护患者和工作人员安全的影响,并将讨论整个多学科团队在口罩使用方面的合规性或缺乏合规性。文献检索:使用四个电子健康数据库来确定相关研究:CINAHL、Medline、EMCare和Cochrane Library。检索到的文章的参考文献列表也被手动搜索,并检索到适当的文献。数据评估综合:使用了纳入和排除标准,表明15篇文章完全符合被批评的标准(见文献矩阵补充材料中的表2)。对实践的影响:SSI是多因素的,没有审查过可能导致这种术后并发症的病因因素,如合并症和其他变量(如体温过低)。然而,有证据表明,外科口罩有助于减少手术室环境中的生物负荷。它们也是一件重要的个人防护装备,应该穿戴,以保护围手术期团队免受常见的血液和体液飞溅的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Perioperative Nursing
Journal of Perioperative Nursing Nursing-Medical and Surgical Nursing
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信